Poo tin... Put@in...
Comments
-
MattFalle said:
this, totally. utterly surreal and utterly, utterly brilliant.pinno said:^ cross fingers.
There are signs that Ukraine is resisting way beyond what was initially imagined.
There's some spirit there...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHpX6_B8ArE 1 -
There you go again. I bet fraudsters would love to have your contact details.rjsterry said:
Err, no. Just not taking the word of the Kremlin seriously.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
Try not to project so much."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
agree completely, but sometimes subjects are so emotive when you are directly involved in them you can't help but kick back.rjsterry said:FWIW, it's genuinely interesting to hear 'expert' views on all subjects but if we never commented outside our field this place would be very quiet. Other 'general public' opinions are interesting as well even when not fully informed on every detail.
Please excuse me if I choose the wrong words here or come across wrong.
The back story behind Marine A is long and extremely, extremely sad - really graphic: far too much for here. War at its worst. Fuckinghorrible. What he and his multiple went through was awful by any standards.
Even us still serving do not, in any shape, form, reasoning condone what Blackman did, but we understand it. He did it, he was rightly and justly convicted. He should never have done it. But we know why he did.
We don't need random people judging us. We don't need the suburban trendies wringing their hands. The courts and our peers judge us pretty hard. We're also pretty hard on ourselves. Its why we stick together..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
1 -
Not sure if you meant to post that Shirley. Another one falls into the patronising centreftiebollox habit. Hey hoshirley_basso said:I can't tell if Stevo is being thick, trolling or hideously in denial and just loves to deflect.
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Interesting piece from the UF front lines. They’re well trained, organised, they have support and most of all they have high moral.
I wasn’t aware that the Russians with the white arm bands are army irregulars e.g from ethnic minorities. The red arm band Russians are the regular troops.
Defiant Ukrainian troops tell Russians: 'Go home while you're still alive' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-608605480 -
that makes me smile.briantrumpet said:MattFalle said:
this, totally. utterly surreal and utterly, utterly brilliant.pinno said:^ cross fingers.
There are signs that Ukraine is resisting way beyond what was initially imagined.
There's some spirit there...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHpX6_B8ArE
shopkeeper dude is mega..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
.
The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Fair enough. I don't know enough about the case to comment much except to say that I don't think you need to have served to have some empathy with the situation even if that's not a full appreciation.MattFalle said:
agree completely, but sometimes subjects are so emotive when you are directly involved in them you can't help but kick back.rjsterry said:FWIW, it's genuinely interesting to hear 'expert' views on all subjects but if we never commented outside our field this place would be very quiet. Other 'general public' opinions are interesting as well even when not fully informed on every detail.
Please excuse me if I choose the wrong words here or come across wrong.
The back story behind Marine A is long and extremely, extremely sad - really graphic: far too much for here. War at its worst. Fuckinghorrible. What he and his multiple went through was awful by any standards.
Even us still serving do not, in any shape, form, reasoning condone what Blackman did, but we understand it. He did it, he was rightly and justly convicted. He should never have done it. But we know why he did.
We don't need random people judging us. We don't need the suburban trendies wringing their hands. The courts and our peers judge us pretty hard. We're also pretty hard on ourselves. Its why we stick together.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition1 -
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.0 -
grazie - appreciated.rjsterry said:
Fair enough. I don't know enough about the case to comment much except to say that I don't think you need to have served to have some empathy with the situation even if that's not a full appreciation.MattFalle said:
agree completely, but sometimes subjects are so emotive when you are directly involved in them you can't help but kick back.rjsterry said:FWIW, it's genuinely interesting to hear 'expert' views on all subjects but if we never commented outside our field this place would be very quiet. Other 'general public' opinions are interesting as well even when not fully informed on every detail.
Please excuse me if I choose the wrong words here or come across wrong.
The back story behind Marine A is long and extremely, extremely sad - really graphic: far too much for here. War at its worst. Fuckinghorrible. What he and his multiple went through was awful by any standards.
Even us still serving do not, in any shape, form, reasoning condone what Blackman did, but we understand it. He did it, he was rightly and justly convicted. He should never have done it. But we know why he did.
We don't need random people judging us. We don't need the suburban trendies wringing their hands. The courts and our peers judge us pretty hard. We're also pretty hard on ourselves. Its why we stick together.
45 were getting smashed at the time. frickin' awful. when the story of it all came out everyone was kinda taken aback..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Just a quick Google brings up quite a few - https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-invited-lebedevs-villa-girls-26485306john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.
I really don’t understand the unequivocal support of Johnson when he is obviously utterly woeful.
Now Rory Stewart I could vote for.0 -
because he is a rich lying adulterous cheating racist who, for some reason, working class racists look up to and aspire to be.skyblueamateur said:
Just a quick Google brings up quite a few - https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-invited-lebedevs-villa-girls-26485306john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.
I really don’t understand the unequivocal support of Johnson when he is obviously utterly woeful.
Now Rory Stewart I could vote for.
he's taken the pissout of a whole tranche of English society who have deep throated him and Rees Mogg and, for some reason, still believe he's working for them whilst every day messing up their lives and laughing, openly, in their faces.
you honestly couldn't make thisshit up..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
3 -
Almost every mainstream national paper covered it.john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Fake news I’m sure. Laughable.rjsterry said:
Almost every mainstream national paper covered it.john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.0 -
Sources? As others have said - it is public domain knowledge, covered extensively in the media at the time.john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.0 -
Honestly are you not embarrassed by playground arguements like "prove it with hard evidence?"Stevo_666 said:
As far as I can see you believe what you want to believe and interpret the facts to suit your views. Then claim that people who take a different view based on the facts are not exercising critical thinking. That's a lack of critical thinking in itself, but you appear to be unable to spot that.shirley_basso said:I can't tell if Stevo is being thick, trolling or hideously in denial and just loves to deflect.
There is lots of evidence to support it all of the above - russian donors, russians paying to spend time with tory politicians, boris going to an oligarcs party without his secturiy detail and sleeping in his clothes, tories not applying immediate sanctions to oligarchs. The right wing media are quick to publish kremlin news and the left to ignore it. Given most of russia is educated by russian controlled media, the russian news channel has had its ofcom licence revoked for being branded as propoganda.Stevo_666 said:
Nice one. Got any real evidence for this? Pretty sure oligarchs who are smart an ruthless enough to amass fortunes in the way they did coukd see which way the wind was blowing and take evasive action. Although seems quite a few didn't, just doing by the value of frozen assets recently reported.shirley_basso said:Reference my point above.
It plays well into their hands that they can get the UK press to say how awful the UK's sanctions are, when it turns out all the oligarchs put their assets into blind trusts / sold them / moved them prior to the sanctions being enforced.
Nice smoke and mirrors to defend the Tories (who are financed to the tune of c.£2m by russian oligarchs and have Lord in the HoL)
More leftiebollox tin foil hat stuff IMO.
Frankly i'm embarassed for you for exercising so little critical thinking (seems a recurring theme) and at myself for wasting my time typing the above.
What say above is at best circumstantial, especially in the light if current sanctions and aid to Ukraine.
So show me some hard evidence to back up your claims.
Who are you trying to defend and why?
I'm not an investigative journalist or a PI and no I won't get you hard evidence. Stop being so pathetic.
What I have said in my earlier posts, to most people, is not really circumstantial but a record of fact (all the above has happened, the reasons of which may be open to interpretation depending on your political allegiance).
Forgot to mention the relative of an oligarch appointed a lord against MI6 wishes.
I'm not a leftie, either. But nice try to pigeonhole me to back up your non existent arguements.
Try again with an actual discussion point other than 'prove it with hard evidence Mr leftiebollox' because your arguement is descending into blinkered flagshagging.0 -
"Prove it with hard evidence"MattFalle said:
because he is a rich lying adulterous cheating racist who, for some reason, working class racists look up to and aspire to be.skyblueamateur said:
Just a quick Google brings up quite a few - https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-invited-lebedevs-villa-girls-26485306john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.
I really don’t understand the unequivocal support of Johnson when he is obviously utterly woeful.
Now Rory Stewart I could vote for.
he's taken the pissout of a whole tranche of English society who have deep throated him and Rees Mogg and, for some reason, still believe he's working for them whilst every day messing up their lives and laughing, openly, in their faces.
you honestly couldn't make thisshit up.
🤮0 -
-
Why else would you be replying?briantrumpet said:"Touched a nerve."
0 -
#postcount?shirley_basso said:
Why else would you be replying?briantrumpet said:"Touched a nerve."
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
To be fair when people are risking their lives it's understandable that they are sensitive to criticism from those who aren't. At the same timeMattFalle said:
agree completely, but sometimes subjects are so emotive when you are directly involved in them you can't help but kick back.rjsterry said:FWIW, it's genuinely interesting to hear 'expert' views on all subjects but if we never commented outside our field this place would be very quiet. Other 'general public' opinions are interesting as well even when not fully informed on every detail.
Please excuse me if I choose the wrong words here or come across wrong.
The back story behind Marine A is long and extremely, extremely sad - really graphic: far too much for here. War at its worst. Fuckinghorrible. What he and his multiple went through was awful by any standards.
Even us still serving do not, in any shape, form, reasoning condone what Blackman did, but we understand it. He did it, he was rightly and justly convicted. He should never have done it. But we know why he did.
We don't need random people judging us. We don't need the suburban trendies wringing their hands. The courts and our peers judge us pretty hard. We're also pretty hard on ourselves. Its why we stick together.
To be fair I think the majority of the civilian population wouldn't disagree with any of that MF - certainly my feelings were that the guy is another victim of war.
As you say you can understand - even without really knowing how that feels to be in a war situation - and knowing he's there at "our" bidding you can't help but feel uneasy.
What I can't understand are the likes of Putin. You've got money, power, a much younger ex Olympian girlfriend - yet that's not enough for him he wants Ukraine and is willing to pay in tens of thousands of lives.[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0 -
He's no RC. Thats taking things too far.MattFalle said:
#postcount?shirley_basso said:
Why else would you be replying?briantrumpet said:"Touched a nerve."
1 -
-
that's because Putin's a belter. pure and simple. utter moujie of the first order.DeVlaeminck said:To be fair when people are risking their lives it's understandable that they are sensitive to criticism from those who aren't. At the same time
MattFalle said:
agree completely, but sometimes subjects are so emotive when you are directly involved in them you can't help but kick back.rjsterry said:FWIW, it's genuinely interesting to hear 'expert' views on all subjects but if we never commented outside our field this place would be very quiet. Other 'general public' opinions are interesting as well even when not fully informed on every detail.
Please excuse me if I choose the wrong words here or come across wrong.
The back story behind Marine A is long and extremely, extremely sad - really graphic: far too much for here. War at its worst. Fuckinghorrible. What he and his multiple went through was awful by any standards.
Even us still serving do not, in any shape, form, reasoning condone what Blackman did, but we understand it. He did it, he was rightly and justly convicted. He should never have done it. But we know why he did.
We don't need random people judging us. We don't need the suburban trendies wringing their hands. The courts and our peers judge us pretty hard. We're also pretty hard on ourselves. Its why we stick together.
To be fair I think the majority of the civilian population wouldn't disagree with any of that MF - certainly my feelings were that the guy is another victim of war.
As you say you can understand - even without really knowing how that feels to be in a war situation - and knowing he's there at "our" bidding you can't help but feel uneasy.
What I can't understand are the likes of Putin. You've got money, power, a much younger ex Olympian girlfriend - yet that's not enough for him he wants Ukraine and is willing to pay in tens of thousands of lives..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Not enough put@in?0
-
Asking someone for proof of a claim is not support. It's why we have libel and defamation laws.skyblueamateur said:
Just a quick Google brings up quite a few - https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-invited-lebedevs-villa-girls-26485306john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.
I really don’t understand the unequivocal support of Johnson when he is obviously utterly woeful.
Now Rory Stewart I could vote for.0 -
It was good of Rory Stewart to protect the person that invited him to a obligarchs party by not naming him/her. What an utterly poor article. Look I am not saying that Boris is not a douch bag but this really does not prove anything. The OP claim was indicating he went to a party and was sleeping with prostitute's. If this is true given that Boris has been doing some real harm to Russian interests over the last month we would not have the honey trap video on the internet.skyblueamateur said:
Just a quick Google brings up quite a few - https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-invited-lebedevs-villa-girls-26485306john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.
I really don’t understand the unequivocal support of Johnson when he is obviously utterly woeful.
Now Rory Stewart I could vote for.0 -
Why do you think Johnson has a relationship with Lebedev, and why did he personally intervene to ensure he became a Lord despite protestations from people responsible UK security?0
-
douche. with an "e". as in "de pffeffel is a racist, lying, adultering, cheating douche bag", not de pffeffel is a racist, lying cheating, adulterous douch bag."john80 said:
It was good of Rory Stewart to protect the person that invited him to a obligarchs party by not naming him/her. What an utterly poor article. Look I am not saying that Boris is not a douch bag but this really does not prove anything. The OP claim was indicating he went to a party and was sleeping with prostitute's. If this is true given that Boris has been doing some real harm to Russian interests over the last month we would not have the honey trap video on the internet.skyblueamateur said:
Just a quick Google brings up quite a few - https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-invited-lebedevs-villa-girls-26485306john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.
I really don’t understand the unequivocal support of Johnson when he is obviously utterly woeful.
Now Rory Stewart I could vote for.
the "e" on "de pffeffel is a lying, racist, cheating, adulterous douche bag" makes all the difference..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
and there no apostrophe in "prostitutes" it's a plural, not a possessive.john80 said:
It was good of Rory Stewart to protect the person that invited him to a obligarchs party by not naming him/her. What an utterly poor article. Look I am not saying that Boris is not a douch bag but this really does not prove anything. The OP claim was indicating he went to a party and was sleeping with prostitute's. If this is true given that Boris has been doing some real harm to Russian interests over the last month we would not have the honey trap video on the internet.skyblueamateur said:
Just a quick Google brings up quite a few - https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-invited-lebedevs-villa-girls-26485306john80 said:
You got any sources for you lebedev claims above. Particularly the claims that he was at a party with what you are presumably calling prostitute's.imposter2.0 said:
No, not really. The guy is shameless, we already know that. If he cared about stuff like that, he might try a bit harder to look less like a sack of sh11t all the time. While he might not care about his own behaviour, I'm sure the Tory 'moral majority' would have something to say.john80 said:
To be compromised would he not need to be embarrassed by his behaviour. Cue the honey trap operation that failed when the guy asked for copies of the photos so he could brag about the standard of female he had bedded.imposter2.0 said:
There's more evidence to suggest that he is - and not so much evidence to suggest he isn't. Personally, I think it highly likely that the Russians have kompromat on him.Stevo_666 said:
Another one who swallows the theories about about Boris being a Kremlin undercover agent. Bit gullible?rjsterry said:
Oh, well if that's what the Kremlin says...Stevo_666 said:
The one named by the Kremlin as the most active anti-Russian leader?mrb123 said:
Spot the odd one out...
https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/24/ukraine-war-latest-russia-news-putin-peace-nato-zelensky/
I'm sure the Lebedev family didn't invite spaffer to their Italian mansion for the weekend "with girls" because they liked his company.
I really don’t understand the unequivocal support of Johnson when he is obviously utterly woeful.
Now Rory Stewart I could vote for.
as in "the racist, lying, cheating adulterous douche bag de pffeffel slept with prostitutes"
otherwise it would be "the racist, lying, cheating adulterous douche bag de pffeffel slept with prostitute's work colleagues".The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
1
