Photography Thread
Comments
-
Top tip right there. Central verticals are alway vertical.briantrumpet said:
Otherwise, if there are verticals, then I try to get a vertical somewhere in the middle of the photo as vertical as I can, and then shrug my shoulders at the other verticals/horizontals that haven't played ball.
Horizontals can be off due to leading away/towards.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
briantrumpet said:
It's always annoying when the lines that you think should be parallel horizontals don't quite line up. You can jiggle with perspective plug-ins if it's close enough to be doable without it being ridiculous.Pross said:Yeah top was definitely the better light. Not sure why they're sloping, I used the feature on my phone that suggests the focal point and displays a line that stretches across the screen when you get the 'right' angle. I think the top one is horizontal but the ground is sloping in front of the church, the lower one has the ground level but not the edge of the watercourse.
Otherwise, if there are verticals, then I try to get a vertical somewhere in the middle of the photo as vertical as I can, and then shrug my shoulders at the other verticals/horizontals that haven't played ball.
Yes, I just concentrate on the verticals, getting one (centre) of them plumb with a level camera/phone. That’s about the best you can do without a tripod and spirit level. I also try not to tilt the camera upwards especially when shooting buildings, though it’s not always possible.
Just keep ‘em coming, there great to see
0 -
Couple of old ones I came across in my album from a walk around London on a summer's evening a couple of years ago.
2 -
-
Yeah, takes some beating for road cycling round there so long as the wind isn't blowing too hard across those moors.pinno said:0 -
This thread has got me thinking a bit more about photography and reading up on it so hoping to start trying to take proper photos soon and consider things such as exposure length rather than just pointing and pressing at things I see of interest to me. I've never really understood any of the phrases before - sometimes I get quite lucky and produce a fairly decent, sharp image but usually it doesn't come out as the image I'm seeing.0
-
-
I've just been trying to get some frost photos in the garden but it wasn't thick enough on any of the plants. Took some of the ice on the birdbath but it isn't as nice as I'd hoped. With a bit of luch tomorrow will be a crisp one as I'm going to be out and about around sunrise.
0 -
You will probably learn more from failures than successes. Post up for critique (if you can take it). Most flaws are easily fixed with a bit of knowledge of how and when to go off auto.Pross said:...Took some of the ice on the birdbath but it isn't as nice as I'd hoped..
Quite probably under exposed for what you want in this example.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
It's hard to tell the ice is ice, it looks like leaves under the waterpblakeney said:
You will probably learn more from failures than successes. Post up for critique (if you can take it). Most flaws are easily fixed with a bit of knowledge of how and when to go off auto.Pross said:...Took some of the ice on the birdbath but it isn't as nice as I'd hoped..
Quite probably under exposed for what you want in this example.
0 -
Awkward shot.
1. The ice will be reflecting colours from around it.
2. The ice is underexposed, and even more so again due to the sunlit edge.
Reposition next time so that the ice is the brightest part of the photo and avoid reflections. I dare say that the second part is problematic.
Just a thought (and a cheat), a breath to give the ice some condensation might help.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.1 -
Another trick here is to go into a manual setting, over-expose the whole lot and then play with the shadows and highlights in post-processing.Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/0 -
I guess I am an old school slide photographer.Ben6899 said:Another trick here is to go into a manual setting, over-expose the whole lot and then play with the shadows and highlights in post-processing.
I still expose for the highlights and develop for the shadows. Each to their own. 😉The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/2 -
The full moon, clear sky and high tide meant even Newport was worth photographing tonight. Takes perfect timing so it's dark enough to hide the many flaws whilst being early enough to give you a sporting chance of not being mugged for your phone / camera!
2 -
Complete fluke that it has lined up to look like the moon is being fired out of the bridge on the bottom one!1
-
Ben6899 said:
I like that - I hope you don't mind, but I wanted to see what it would look like as a negative... and that kinda works too. because the shapes are strong, I think.
1 -
Don’t mind at all - it looks great as a negative, doesn’t it!?
(It’s the National Theatre, btw, if anyone wondered)Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/0 -
Yes, I thought it looked good... I did it partly because at first (quick) glance, your photo looked like a negative, so was interested in how it would look actually inverted.Ben6899 said:Don’t mind at all - it looks great as a negative, doesn’t it!?
(It’s the National Theatre, btw, if anyone wondered)0 -
And then perhaps it works even better when flipped vertically...
1 -
Anyway, enough of strong shapes, how about a strong clever sheep who can balance a big tree on its back...
1 -
Is it a ewe tree?2
-
masjer said:
Is it a ewe tree?
Very good! (Just annoyed I didn't think of that...)0 -
If she isn’t careful, with all that lifting, she’ll need an operation.Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/0 -
...on her baaaack.
I'll get my coat.seanoconn - gruagach craic!1 -
Really impressed with the phone camera, this past week. Gas containers, National Theatre, and now this one.Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/5 -
How come you’ve got a picture of my cat.
3 -
webboo said:
How come you’ve got a picture of my cat.
You need to lock the front door.Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/0 -
Here's one I took on Monday, not a great shot in the photography sense more a moment in time. I found it hard to take, riding on soft ground one handed looking ahead and releasing the shutter pointing sideways...
Cycling towards a local (aircraft) bombing range, at Donna Nook in Lincolnshire
3 -
Here's a panorama from yesterday, on the side of Steyning Bowl.
7