Photography Thread
Comments
-
masjer said:
Cheers for the heads-up, I'll check it out for a wallow.
Nothing's quite like it for cooling the blood.0 -
Two very different photos from today's stroll.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.7 -
-
pblakeney said:
Two very different photos from today's stroll.
Cracking, PB.
I hope that will be billed to a client.0 -
In my dreams.briantrumpet said:
Cracking, PB.
I hope that will be billed to a client.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.1 -
0
-
-
seanoconn said:
Sorry Brian 😔briantrumpet said:
You followed me, followed.0 -
I think he's got it.briantrumpet said:
[I hope so]seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
My mum went to see them in London in about 1954, and we had an LP or two, so I grew up with the songs.pinno said:
I think he's got it.briantrumpet said:
[I hope so]0 -
Was:briantrumpet said:
My mum went to see them in London in about 1954, and we had an LP or two, so I grew up with the songs.pinno said:
I think he's got it.briantrumpet said:
[I hope so]
'Down in the jungle living in a tent'
and
Harry Belafonte singing on it?seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
pinno said:
Was:briantrumpet said:
My mum went to see them in London in about 1954, and we had an LP or two, so I grew up with the songs.pinno said:
I think he's got it.briantrumpet said:
[I hope so]
'Down in the jungle living in a tent'
and
Harry Belafonte singing on it?
Doesn't ring a bell. The show Mum saw was 'At The Drop Of Another Hat', and I think that's the LP I remember.0 -
6 -
Cracking sky 👍Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי0
-
What a difference the light makes, two (as near as I could get them) identical photos taken today. One around midday when the mist wasn't lifting and the other around 2 hours later when the sun finally came through.
2 -
Ah ok.0
-
Pross said:
What a difference the light makes, two (as near as I could get them) identical photos taken today. One around midday when the mist wasn't lifting and the other around 2 hours later when the sun finally came through.
Indeed... there are days of 'flat light' when it's really hard work to get a single interesting shot.0 -
Those are the days for portraits and close ups.briantrumpet said:
Indeed... there are days of 'flat light' when it's really hard work to get a single interesting shot.
Reference my fungi above as an example when the sun went hiding.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Yes, that's when I tend to go macro fishing, when flatter light can be better than bright light.pblakeney said:
Those are the days for portraits and close ups.briantrumpet said:
Indeed... there are days of 'flat light' when it's really hard work to get a single interesting shot.
Reference my fungi above as an example when the sun went hiding.1 -
I prefer the darker first picture with the strip of sun streaking below the church/building with no people in sight.Pross said:What a difference the light makes, two (as near as I could get them) identical photos taken today. One around midday when the mist wasn't lifting and the other around 2 hours later when the sun finally came through.
Although both pics are slightly wonky pross 😕Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי0 -
Yeah top was definitely the better light. Not sure why they're sloping, I used the feature on my phone that suggests the focal point and displays a line that stretches across the screen when you get the 'right' angle. I think the top one is horizontal but the ground is sloping in front of the church, the lower one has the ground level but not the edge of the watercourse.0
-
It's always annoying when the lines that you think should be parallel horizontals don't quite line up. You can jiggle with perspective plug-ins if it's close enough to be doable without it being ridiculous.Pross said:Yeah top was definitely the better light. Not sure why they're sloping, I used the feature on my phone that suggests the focal point and displays a line that stretches across the screen when you get the 'right' angle. I think the top one is horizontal but the ground is sloping in front of the church, the lower one has the ground level but not the edge of the watercourse.
Otherwise, if there are verticals, then I try to get a vertical somewhere in the middle of the photo as vertical as I can, and then shrug my shoulders at the other verticals/horizontals that haven't played ball.0 -
Given the offset in the spray pattern of the fountain I reckon there’s some mysterious gravity glitch going on there to upset your verticals 😀Pross said:Yeah top was definitely the better light. Not sure why they're sloping, I used the feature on my phone that suggests the focal point and displays a line that stretches across the screen when you get the 'right' angle. I think the top one is horizontal but the ground is sloping in front of the church, the lower one has the ground level but not the edge of the watercourse.
Open One+ BMC TE29 Seven 622SL On One Scandal Cervelo RS0 -
It's doing my head in looking at them now you barstewards.
Another before and after the sun came out comparisons. Hopefully no wonky lines
1 -
And a few others
2 -
Pross said:
It's doing my head in looking at them now you barstewards.
Another before and after the sun came out comparisons. Hopefully no wonky lines
Good choice - avoiding any 'horizontal' or 'vertical' lines 😂0
