TdF 2016 Stage 14 *Contains spoilers*
Comments
-
MrB123 wrote:Hard to see Cav dropping out the Tour now. One more win this year and the record is really on the cards.
I would suggest that another win on the Champs Elysees ranks higher in his mind than the overall stage record.“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
Miguel Indurain 52 today.0 -
TailWindHome wrote:MrB123 wrote:Hard to see Cav dropping out the Tour now. One more win this year and the record is really on the cards.
I would suggest that another win on the Champs Elysees ranks higher in his mind than the overall stage record.
Yeah he has to believe the Champs is well within reach.0 -
-
^Ha!0
-
Double post.0
-
IAbove The Cows wrote:tonyf34 wrote:RichN95 wrote:ddraver wrote:First bit of this year I ve been able to watch, Blimey have all Cav's wins been that good???
I was thinking during that discussion with McEwen whether Cav was that dominant 2009-2012 because he was just amazin or because everyone else was a bit rubbish, he didn't have a challenger. That isn't to criticise Cav but Greipel was not racing the Tour then, Kittel wasn't around, Kristoff hadn't appeared. Who did Cav have as competition back then? Hushovd?
Tyler Ferrar and an aging Petachi were his erm.. Rivals."Unfortunately these days a lot of people don’t understand the real quality of a bike" Ernesto Colnago0 -
Above The Cows wrote:OCDuPalais wrote:I love losing in PTP when Cav wins.
Good man. Not that I'm playing PTP this year but whenever I picked him he lost. So it seems it works for others. I also turn my TV off because if I don't watch the sprint, he wins.
Every time I pick Kittel, Cav wins. I'm going to continue picking KittelTop Ten finisher - PTP Tour of Britain 20160 -
JSCL wrote:I'm not really sure why Kittel feels the need to take it from the front every time.0
-
Graeme_S wrote:JSCL wrote:I'm not really sure why Kittel feels the need to take it from the front every time.
I do believe Kittel is still a great sprinter, he's only 28. It seems to be a common thing at EQS that riders lack confidence in themselves. He may be the big guy, but that doesn't mean he can't get the benefit from following the wheels behind someone else.
You can see whenever Cav is sat in his wheel in to the sprint, you just know he's going to take it without fail (at the moment anyway). I think we'll see much more and better racing from Kittel, just not this tour.Follow me on Twitter - http://twitter.com/scalesjason - All posts are strictly my personal view.0 -
Diplomatic language from Kittel post stage "move influenced the result'". Agreed, he might have got 3rd or 4th.
The way Cav analyses the last couple of hundred metres suggests his confidence (in himself and his team-mates) is sky high. Clearly looking for more stage wins.0 -
The lack of Giant-Alpecin train is having a big effect I think.
Ettix get the timing wrong - The whole Giant thing of leaving it late and really winding it up seemed to work well for Kittel.
But Cavendish just bette than he has been the last few years. I thought / hoped he was suffering the usual decline sprinters get as they get older but nae such luck.Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
Glad I didn't watch today's stage, never want Cavendish to win.0
-
-
Cav currently chatting on "Vive le Velo", the Belgian Avondetappe.
Robbie McEwan is the guest.
Seems as if the whole hour is about Cav."Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
FocusZing wrote:mfin wrote:Glad I didn't watch today's stage, never want Cavendish to win.
What did you think about the other three stages he has won?
Haven't got a problem with his performances, it's him, I just find him boring and he's definitely a sore loser which doesn't help. I do understand how so many people will like him purely because he wins and he's british though.0 -
tonyf34 wrote:Above The Cows wrote:tonyf34 wrote:RichN95 wrote:ddraver wrote:First bit of this year I ve been able to watch, Blimey have all Cav's wins been that good???
I was thinking during that discussion with McEwen whether Cav was that dominant 2009-2012 because he was just amazing or because everyone else was a bit rubbish, he didn't have a challenger. That isn't to criticise Cav but Greipel was not racing the Tour then, Kittel wasn't around, Kristoff hadn't appeared. Who did Cav have as competition back then? Hushovd?
I think there were still plenty for Cav to worry about before Griepel et al Hush was bigger than AG at his peak. Maybe teams are more organised now than when Cav first came to the fore?
Hushovd was quite handy, especially given an uphill finish, and Petacchi was good enough still to win green in 2010. One R McEwen was still about, even if he was having to snipe the odd win. Ciolek wasn't terrible, either. Cavendish's winning margins were ridiculous during that period though - I doubt anyone could have lived with that speed, to be honest.0 -
mfin wrote:FocusZing wrote:mfin wrote:Glad I didn't watch today's stage, never want Cavendish to win.
What did you think about the other three stages he has won?
Haven't got a problem with his performances, it's him, I just find him boring and he's definitely a sore loser which doesn't help. I do understand how so many people will like him purely because he wins and he's british though.
But he is very fast, great to watch and if he's lost I'll just avoid the interviews where he acts like a teat...
I think people like that he "wears his heart on his sleeve".0 -
bobmcstuff wrote:mfin wrote:FocusZing wrote:mfin wrote:Glad I didn't watch today's stage, never want Cavendish to win.
What did you think about the other three stages he has won?
Haven't got a problem with his performances, it's him, I just find him boring and he's definitely a sore loser which doesn't help. I do understand how so many people will like him purely because he wins and he's british though.
But he is very fast, great to watch and if he's lost I'll just avoid the interviews where he acts like a teat...
I think people like that he "wears his heart on his sleeve".
He wears his sore loser heart on his sleeve when he loses, when he wins the team thanking and so on seems so insincere and always sounds the same too. Always like listening to other great sporting talkers like Wayne Rooney too.0 -
I imagine DS folks out there want their sprinters to be sore losers to a degree, or at least angry about losing.
Being gracious in defeat is one thing, but I imagine that at times this could be interpreted as accepting defeat, which managers and sports pscychos whould have an issue with (to put it mildly).0 -
-
mfin wrote:FocusZing wrote:mfin wrote:Glad I didn't watch today's stage, never want Cavendish to win.
What did you think about the other three stages he has won?
Haven't got a problem with his performances, it's him, I just find him boring and he's definitely a sore loser which doesn't help. I do understand how so many people will like him purely because he wins and he's british though.
I love the fact he hates losing and wears his heart on his sleeve rather than being media trained drone0 -
mfin wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:mfin wrote:FocusZing wrote:mfin wrote:Glad I didn't watch today's stage, never want Cavendish to win.
What did you think about the other three stages he has won?
Haven't got a problem with his performances, it's him, I just find him boring and he's definitely a sore loser which doesn't help. I do understand how so many people will like him purely because he wins and he's british though.
But he is very fast, great to watch and if he's lost I'll just avoid the interviews where he acts like a teat...
I think people like that he "wears his heart on his sleeve".
He wears his sore loser heart on his sleeve when he loses, when he wins the team thanking and so on seems so insincere and always sounds the same too. Always like listening to other great sporting talkers like Wayne Rooney too.
Even assuming this is true, 95% of riders would save the insincerity for when they lose (Kittel: "my team were perfect today" despite dropping him off far enough out that he could lose the sprint, sit up, throw his toys out the pram and still not have rolled in). Why not appreciate a rider for sharing his actual thoughts when he's pissed off, rather than refusing to speak at all - he's not under any obligation.
And for what it's worth, I've heard lots of sprinters praise their team. I can't remember hearing any of the others explain precisely what each individual contributed over the 10km prior to a victory.
I understand you don't like Cavendish, and that's fine - we all have our inexplicable prejudices and favourites - but it sounds to me as if you're inventing things to justify it. Perhaps you're too busy grinding your teeth (or pointedly not watching a stage that you feel qualified to comment on) to actually listen to what he says?0 -
Boring he ain'tNapoleon, don't be jealous that I've been chatting online with babes all day. Besides, we both know that I'm training to be a cage fighter.0
-
Rick Chasey wrote:
Great shot, S5 looks good. He get's so low and aero.
I like the way he is talking about seeing the tour to Paris. Hope he still manages to get a gold in Rio.0 -
underlayunderlay wrote:mfin wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:mfin wrote:FocusZing wrote:mfin wrote:Glad I didn't watch today's stage, never want Cavendish to win.
What did you think about the other three stages he has won?
Haven't got a problem with his performances, it's him, I just find him boring and he's definitely a sore loser which doesn't help. I do understand how so many people will like him purely because he wins and he's british though.
But he is very fast, great to watch and if he's lost I'll just avoid the interviews where he acts like a teat...
I think people like that he "wears his heart on his sleeve".
He wears his sore loser heart on his sleeve when he loses, when he wins the team thanking and so on seems so insincere and always sounds the same too. Always like listening to other great sporting talkers like Wayne Rooney too.
Even assuming this is true, 95% of riders would save the insincerity for when they lose (Kittel: "my team were perfect today" despite dropping him off far enough out that he could lose the sprint, sit up, throw his toys out the pram and still not have rolled in). Why not appreciate a rider for sharing his actual thoughts when he's pissed off, rather than refusing to speak at all - he's not under any obligation.
And for what it's worth, I've heard lots of sprinters praise their team. I can't remember hearing any of the others explain precisely what each individual contributed over the 10km prior to a victory.
I understand you don't like Cavendish, and that's fine - we all have our inexplicable prejudices and favourites - but it sounds to me as if you're inventing things to justify it. Perhaps you're too busy grinding your teeth (or pointedly not watching a stage that you feel qualified to comment on) to actually listen to what he says?
No, I've witnessed stacks of Cavendish's wins, and plenty of his interviews and to me he comes across just like I've said. Simple.0 -
Was just daydreaming seeing Cav V Cipolini V The Tashkent Terror in their prime.... Now that would have been a match upWarning No formatter is installed for the format0
-
I like Cav. I think he's genuine and honest. When his team has cocked up he'll say it, when he's cocked up he'll admit it (barring some cases of argy bargy in disputed sprints). I think he's genuine when he praises his teammates, and have heard him talk about how much pressure he feels to deliver when his team have worked their arses off for him.Warning No formatter is installed for the format0