Donald Trump

18283858788551

Comments

  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,327
    letap73 wrote:
    Sounds bad, but latest rumour is that it was info on ISIS.
    Good.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • bendertherobot
    bendertherobot Posts: 11,684
    He denies doing it.

    I was in the room with him, he didn't do it.

    Hi everyone, I'm the President, I did it and can do what I like.
    My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
    https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
    Facebook? No. Just say no.
  • dinyull
    dinyull Posts: 2,979
    The WP never claimed he did what his spokesmen claimed he didn't do.

    They have basically backed up their story.

    As has Trump.

    But as everything with this clown, nothing will be done and nothing will change.
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    Dinyull wrote:

    But as everything with this clown, nothing will be done and nothing will change.

    Apart from the rumours of grand jurys being convened and sealed indictments being filed against him and other senior members of his team. If only 10% of the current rumours turn out to be true, then the worst case is that he will resign - while the best case is that he will spend the rest of his life in jail.
  • letap73
    letap73 Posts: 1,608
    letap73 wrote:


    The Washington Post leads with the right, The New York Times follows with a left hook:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/us/p ... -news&_r=0
  • dinyull
    dinyull Posts: 2,979
    And yet the Republicans will still do sweet fa.

    He needs to be caught with his pants down with his hand in the jar and even then the Reps will probably back him.

    Remember, this is a man who admitted his fame allowed him to sexual assault whoever he wants. Grab em' by the p*ssy.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152
    He's on fire this week. Next stop... a trip to Saudi Arabia and a speech about Islam.

    What could go wrong? Stay tuned to find out.
  • fenix
    fenix Posts: 5,437
    PBlakeney wrote:
    letap73 wrote:
    Sounds bad, but latest rumour is that it was info on ISIS.
    Good.


    Well you say that - but the information given was enough to identify the source. The source wasn't working for the US but an ally. You can give some information but not enough so people can work out who the source of the Intel is.

    If you're risking your life embedded in dangerous organisations - would you trust Trump not to blow your cover and potentially get you killed ? Already some EU intelligence agencies are having doubts about sharing with the US.

    The man is an ignorant menace and needs to be removed from office. He makes the world a more dangerous place.
  • FocusZing
    FocusZing Posts: 4,373
    edited May 2017
    Fenix wrote:
    PBlakeney wrote:
    letap73 wrote:
    Sounds bad, but latest rumour is that it was info on ISIS.
    Good.


    Well you say that - but the information given was enough to identify the source. The source wasn't working for the US but an ally. You can give some information but not enough so people can work out who the source of the Intel is.

    If you're risking your life embedded in dangerous organisations - would you trust Trump not to blow your cover and potentially get you killed ? Already some EU intelligence agencies are having doubts about sharing with the US.

    The man is an ignorant menace and needs to be removed from office. He makes the world a more dangerous place.

    Exactly. If true it's pretty short sighted and naive. He could have disclosed the information to the Russians via other means (Blechley Park).

    Too much of a show off.
  • veronese68
    veronese68 Posts: 27,814
    Fenix wrote:
    The man is an ignorant menace and needs to be removed from office. He makes the world a more dangerous place.
    Yep.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,327
    Fenix wrote:
    PBlakeney wrote:
    letap73 wrote:
    Sounds bad, but latest rumour is that it was info on ISIS.
    Good.


    Well you say that - but the information given was enough to identify the source. The source wasn't working for the US but an ally. You can give some information but not enough so people can work out who the source of the Intel is.

    If you're risking your life embedded in dangerous organisations - would you trust Trump not to blow your cover and potentially get you killed ? Already some EU intelligence agencies are having doubts about sharing with the US.

    The man is an ignorant menace and needs to be removed from office. He makes the world a more dangerous place.
    True. But look on the bright side.
    The Russians get ISIS and America gets rid of Trump. Win win.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • fenix
    fenix Posts: 5,437
    But you've burnt the asset for ISIS so it might not have been worth the one off hit.

    Didnt Trump say he'd destroy ISIS in 30 days anyway with his secret plan ?

    Christ a seven year old me would make a more effective president. We'd certainly be getting jetpacks by the end of the year under my regime anyway. Now that's progress.
  • FocusZing
    FocusZing Posts: 4,373
    It looks like Trump has been watching too much "Homeland".
  • cycleclinic
    cycleclinic Posts: 6,865
    My 5 year old see trump for what he is. if my 5 year old can do it why can't legions of his supporters. Trump maybe a clown and a potentially dangerous one but he is not the cause the of america's problems he is a symptom. Getting rid of trump will not cure the underlying malaise.

    If trump goes we get pense is he any better?
    http://www.thecycleclinic.co.uk -wheel building and other stuff.
  • mfin
    mfin Posts: 6,729
    "No politician in history has been treated worse or more unfairly"

    Yes, and no politician in history has been so unfit for the job or more thick. So it is directly proportionate Mr Trump, you prat.
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028

    If trump goes we get pense is he any better?

    Most of Trump's team will get indicted around the same time as he does, including Pence. Rumours are that Orrin Hatch is currently first in line to take over - at least temporarily. Either way, Pence is too tied up in the Flynn stuff to come out of this cleanly.
  • bendertherobot
    bendertherobot Posts: 11,684
    Imposter wrote:

    If trump goes we get pense is he any better?

    Most of Trump's team will get indicted around the same time as he does, including Pence. Rumours are that Orrin Hatch is currently first in line to take over - at least temporarily. Either way, Pence is too tied up in the Flynn stuff to come out of this cleanly.

    Speaker of the House?
    My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
    https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
    Facebook? No. Just say no.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152
    mfin wrote:
    "No politician in history has been treated worse or more unfairly"

    Yes, and no politician in history has been so unfit for the job or more thick. So it is directly proportionate Mr Trump, you prat.

    Dan Snow tweeted: "The Emperor Valerian was captured in battle, enslaved, used as a foot-stool, forced to drink molten gold and then skinned and stuffed."
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    Imposter wrote:

    If trump goes we get pense is he any better?

    Most of Trump's team will get indicted around the same time as he does, including Pence. Rumours are that Orrin Hatch is currently first in line to take over - at least temporarily. Either way, Pence is too tied up in the Flynn stuff to come out of this cleanly.

    Speaker of the House?

    Sounds odd, I know...

    https://patribotics.blog/2017/05/11/sou ... ainst-gop/
  • bendertherobot
    bendertherobot Posts: 11,684
    Imposter wrote:
    Imposter wrote:

    If trump goes we get pense is he any better?

    Most of Trump's team will get indicted around the same time as he does, including Pence. Rumours are that Orrin Hatch is currently first in line to take over - at least temporarily. Either way, Pence is too tied up in the Flynn stuff to come out of this cleanly.

    Speaker of the House?

    Sounds odd, I know...

    https://patribotics.blog/2017/05/11/sou ... ainst-gop/

    Ah right. Ryan is 3rd in line. But I hadn't realised there was conjecture about him too.
    My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
    https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
    Facebook? No. Just say no.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152
    Is that Louise Mensch? However much of it is true, there's a massive amount of extrapolation to get from the charges to president Whoever.
  • arthur_scrimshaw
    arthur_scrimshaw Posts: 2,596
    mfin wrote:
    "No politician in history has been treated worse or more unfairly"

    Yes, and no politician in history has been so unfit for the job or more thick. So it is directly proportionate Mr Trump, you prat.

    He could claim that because he has no knowledge or interest in the history of politics.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,327
    mfin wrote:
    "No politician in history has been treated worse or more unfairly"

    Yes, and no politician in history has been so unfit for the job or more thick. So it is directly proportionate Mr Trump, you prat.

    He could claim that because he has no knowledge or interest in the history of politics.
    It could be pointed out that picking an unwarranted fight with the press wasn't the best idea in the first place...
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,317
    Well, 'unwarranted'?! He has been on the receiving end of criticism from the likes of the Washington Post et al well before he was elected.
    I suspect, although I do not know, those papers have been having a pop for years, long before he ran for president.
    Anyway, if Trump gets impeached, is that the end of the populist vote the other side of the pond too?
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,327
    Pinno wrote:
    Well, 'unwarranted'?! He has been on the receiving end of criticism from the likes of the Washington Post et al well before he was elected.
    I wouldn't know about that. I do know that he took exception to certain reporters asking questions that he didn't like during the election.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • letap73
    letap73 Posts: 1,608
    If this all got made into a movie one day ,then a good title for the movie would be:

    Donald and the giant impeachment
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,227
    letap73 wrote:
    If this all got made into a movie one day ,then a good title for the movie would be:

    Donald and the giant impeachment
    :D Badoom tish
  • jmm434
    jmm434 Posts: 18
    I wonder what his FTP is
  • ayjaycee
    ayjaycee Posts: 1,277
    jmm434 wrote:
    I wonder what his FTP is
    Very high if you mean his 'F**king Tw4t Potential'.
    Cannondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra
    Kinesis Racelight 4S
    Specialized Allez Elite (Frame/Forks for sale)
    Specialized Crosstrail Comp Disk (For sale)