Donald Trump
Comments
-
Have you found that evidence of that immediate recession upon voting to leave the EU, that the remainers lied would happen?First.Aspect said:
Perhaps they are Remainers because as economists, they studied it and saw that it was a really, really bad idea.coopster_the_1st said:
You are referencing a blog from two authors who already have a prior remainer position so their blog is going to biased to fit their alreadyFirst.Aspect said:https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/03/22/uk-economy-since-the-brexit-vote-slower-gdp-growth-lower-productivity-and-a-weaker-pound/
Says reading time 5 minutes, so you should be able to digest it in your lunch hour.
The main difference I can see is that the pain has been long and drawn out vs. a recession and, like frogs in boiling water, you haven't really noticed.
Eg Josh De Lyon retweeting remoaners James O'Brien and Guy Verhofstadt
The problem you have is that you have made up your mind and you only listen to anything that confirms what you already think. The rest is just biased or made up.
Sound familiar, Donald?
Surely any search engine would bring up something as big as this immediately?0 -
A possible road to a Trump second term:
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/donald-trumps-stealthy-road-victory-1722350 -
i'm a remainer, i never claimed there'd be an immediate recessioncoopster_the_1st said:
Have you found that evidence of that immediate recession upon voting to leave the EU, that the remainers lied would happen?First.Aspect said:
Perhaps they are Remainers because as economists, they studied it and saw that it was a really, really bad idea.coopster_the_1st said:
You are referencing a blog from two authors who already have a prior remainer position so their blog is going to biased to fit their alreadyFirst.Aspect said:https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/03/22/uk-economy-since-the-brexit-vote-slower-gdp-growth-lower-productivity-and-a-weaker-pound/
Says reading time 5 minutes, so you should be able to digest it in your lunch hour.
The main difference I can see is that the pain has been long and drawn out vs. a recession and, like frogs in boiling water, you haven't really noticed.
Eg Josh De Lyon retweeting remoaners James O'Brien and Guy Verhofstadt
The problem you have is that you have made up your mind and you only listen to anything that confirms what you already think. The rest is just biased or made up.
Sound familiar, Donald?
Surely any search engine would bring up something as big as this immediately?
which makes you a liar, hardly surprising, leavers lied and continue to do somy bike - faster than god's and twice as shiny1 -
You can only make 5% on Biden now.0
-
If I wanted to ask for an idiot to reply I would have asked you directly.sungod said:
i'm a remainer, i never claimed there'd be an immediate recessioncoopster_the_1st said:
Have you found that evidence of that immediate recession upon voting to leave the EU, that the remainers lied would happen?First.Aspect said:
Perhaps they are Remainers because as economists, they studied it and saw that it was a really, really bad idea.coopster_the_1st said:
You are referencing a blog from two authors who already have a prior remainer position so their blog is going to biased to fit their alreadyFirst.Aspect said:https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/03/22/uk-economy-since-the-brexit-vote-slower-gdp-growth-lower-productivity-and-a-weaker-pound/
Says reading time 5 minutes, so you should be able to digest it in your lunch hour.
The main difference I can see is that the pain has been long and drawn out vs. a recession and, like frogs in boiling water, you haven't really noticed.
Eg Josh De Lyon retweeting remoaners James O'Brien and Guy Verhofstadt
The problem you have is that you have made up your mind and you only listen to anything that confirms what you already think. The rest is just biased or made up.
Sound familiar, Donald?
Surely any search engine would bring up something as big as this immediately?
which makes you a liar, hardly surprising, leavers lied and continue to do so
Usual remoaner hypocrisy from you where you are trying to excuse politicians who lied for your side...-3 -
Well at best it is 1-1 isn't it. The currency did tank, and hasn't really recovered, there was no actual recession. But, you know, maths isn't your strong point Coopster. If you have stagnation and suppressed growth for a long time, it can end up the same as a recession followed by recovery.coopster_the_1st said:
Have you found that evidence of that immediate recession upon voting to leave the EU, that the remainers lied would happen?First.Aspect said:
Perhaps they are Remainers because as economists, they studied it and saw that it was a really, really bad idea.coopster_the_1st said:
You are referencing a blog from two authors who already have a prior remainer position so their blog is going to biased to fit their alreadyFirst.Aspect said:https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/03/22/uk-economy-since-the-brexit-vote-slower-gdp-growth-lower-productivity-and-a-weaker-pound/
Says reading time 5 minutes, so you should be able to digest it in your lunch hour.
The main difference I can see is that the pain has been long and drawn out vs. a recession and, like frogs in boiling water, you haven't really noticed.
Eg Josh De Lyon retweeting remoaners James O'Brien and Guy Verhofstadt
The problem you have is that you have made up your mind and you only listen to anything that confirms what you already think. The rest is just biased or made up.
Sound familiar, Donald?
Surely any search engine would bring up something as big as this immediately?
What you need is a colouring pencil and a ruler, some graph paper and scissors. Once you count the squares between the two lines, you might be surprised. (I remember this from middle school).1 -
as we all know, you're a liar, a troll and generally the most obnoxious member of the forumcoopster_the_1st said:
If I wanted to ask for an idiot to reply I would have asked you directly.sungod said:
i'm a remainer, i never claimed there'd be an immediate recessioncoopster_the_1st said:
Have you found that evidence of that immediate recession upon voting to leave the EU, that the remainers lied would happen?First.Aspect said:
Perhaps they are Remainers because as economists, they studied it and saw that it was a really, really bad idea.coopster_the_1st said:
You are referencing a blog from two authors who already have a prior remainer position so their blog is going to biased to fit their alreadyFirst.Aspect said:https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/03/22/uk-economy-since-the-brexit-vote-slower-gdp-growth-lower-productivity-and-a-weaker-pound/
Says reading time 5 minutes, so you should be able to digest it in your lunch hour.
The main difference I can see is that the pain has been long and drawn out vs. a recession and, like frogs in boiling water, you haven't really noticed.
Eg Josh De Lyon retweeting remoaners James O'Brien and Guy Verhofstadt
The problem you have is that you have made up your mind and you only listen to anything that confirms what you already think. The rest is just biased or made up.
Sound familiar, Donald?
Surely any search engine would bring up something as big as this immediately?
which makes you a liar, hardly surprising, leavers lied and continue to do so
Usual remoaner hypocrisy from you where you are trying to excuse politicians who lied for your side...
you clearly enjoy spouting lies, disinformation and abuse, presumably there's little else in your life
you're patheticmy bike - faster than god's and twice as shiny1 -
All the lawsuits are (as usual with Trump) an attempt to gum up the process, and make it so there is a way for them to say "it's not decided", and send their own electors.rick_chasey said:A possible road to a Trump second term:
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/donald-trumps-stealthy-road-victory-172235
It's not going to happen because the gaps are too large in too many states. If it had been a close election, then he might have done it and got away with it (and then had protests, strikes etc).
Once it's confirmed by the electoral college that he lost, he's either going to look into a way he can be pardoned (or do a deal so he doesn't get prosecuted for all the tax fraud, election offences etc that others have served time for), or just mess everything up for the hell of it.0 -
I am simply reflecting your posting attitude back at you.sungod said:
as we all know, you're a liar, a troll and generally the most obnoxious member of the forumcoopster_the_1st said:
If I wanted to ask for an idiot to reply I would have asked you directly.sungod said:
i'm a remainer, i never claimed there'd be an immediate recessioncoopster_the_1st said:
Have you found that evidence of that immediate recession upon voting to leave the EU, that the remainers lied would happen?First.Aspect said:
Perhaps they are Remainers because as economists, they studied it and saw that it was a really, really bad idea.coopster_the_1st said:
You are referencing a blog from two authors who already have a prior remainer position so their blog is going to biased to fit their alreadyFirst.Aspect said:https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/03/22/uk-economy-since-the-brexit-vote-slower-gdp-growth-lower-productivity-and-a-weaker-pound/
Says reading time 5 minutes, so you should be able to digest it in your lunch hour.
The main difference I can see is that the pain has been long and drawn out vs. a recession and, like frogs in boiling water, you haven't really noticed.
Eg Josh De Lyon retweeting remoaners James O'Brien and Guy Verhofstadt
The problem you have is that you have made up your mind and you only listen to anything that confirms what you already think. The rest is just biased or made up.
Sound familiar, Donald?
Surely any search engine would bring up something as big as this immediately?
which makes you a liar, hardly surprising, leavers lied and continue to do so
Usual remoaner hypocrisy from you where you are trying to excuse politicians who lied for your side...
you clearly enjoy spouting lies, disinformation and abuse, presumably there's little else in your life
you're pathetic
You stay in denial that it is you at fault though and blame anyone but yourself...0 -
Damn. He even got to sg0
-
There is a very easy way to deal with trolls. Don't feed them.shirley_basso said:Damn. He even got to sg
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.1 -
@sungod should butt out as it wasn't his conversation. He needs to accept the democratic outcome of the vote before posting again on Brexit as all it does is expose how immature he is.shirley_basso said:Damn. He even got to sg
-2 -
Oh the delicious irony.1
-
I hate to break it to you, but this is the Trump discussion. Trott on...coopster_the_1st said:
@sungod should butt out as it wasn't his conversation. He needs to accept the democratic outcome of the vote before posting again on Brexit as all it does is expose how immature he is.shirley_basso said:Damn. He even got to sg
0 -
Oh, trolls just spaff their stuff anywhere it gets a reaction. It makes 'em feel important when people bite.0
-
Clever. Trotter on, raw gammon stylee. What is the term for a male Karen? A Nigel?darkhairedlord said:
I hate to break it to you, but this is the Trump discussion. Trott on...
-1 -
Yawn! Here the likes of you go again and rather than address the points raised because they have lost the argument they move onto whataboutism.briantrumpet said:Oh, trolls just spaff their stuff anywhere it gets a reaction. It makes 'em feel important when people bite.
If people don't want their posting style reflected back at them, it is on them to change their posting style.
I will continue to call out the hypocrites on this forum giving those who align to their views a free pass to do as they please but attack those who hold different views to them. You and the others that do this are responsible for your own hypocrisy and it is down on you to change.-1 -
This is still the Trump discussion.coopster_the_1st said:
Yawn! Here the likes of you go again and rather than address the points raised because they have lost the argument they move onto whataboutism.briantrumpet said:Oh, trolls just spaff their stuff anywhere it gets a reaction. It makes 'em feel important when people bite.
If people don't want their posting style reflected back at them, it is on them to change their posting style.
I will continue to call out the hypocrites on this forum giving those who align to their views a free pass to do as they please but attack those who hold different views to them. You and the others that do this are responsible for your own hypocrisy and it is down on you to change.
There is a "discuss the website with the bikeradar team" or similar on the forum.0 -
Trump was very happy when he thought Michigan were going to try and throw out all the votes from Detroit. Got a little bit of racism in there too.
0 -
check out the definition of "recession" an immediate one is not possiblecoopster_the_1st said:
Have you found that evidence of that immediate recession upon voting to leave the EU, that the remainers lied would happen?First.Aspect said:
Perhaps they are Remainers because as economists, they studied it and saw that it was a really, really bad idea.coopster_the_1st said:
You are referencing a blog from two authors who already have a prior remainer position so their blog is going to biased to fit their alreadyFirst.Aspect said:https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/03/22/uk-economy-since-the-brexit-vote-slower-gdp-growth-lower-productivity-and-a-weaker-pound/
Says reading time 5 minutes, so you should be able to digest it in your lunch hour.
The main difference I can see is that the pain has been long and drawn out vs. a recession and, like frogs in boiling water, you haven't really noticed.
Eg Josh De Lyon retweeting remoaners James O'Brien and Guy Verhofstadt
The problem you have is that you have made up your mind and you only listen to anything that confirms what you already think. The rest is just biased or made up.
Sound familiar, Donald?
Surely any search engine would bring up something as big as this immediately?
maybe the Govt increased borrowing/spending to avoid a Brexit recession0 -
Ordered to plan. Not the same as having time to do it. Hopefully.rick_chasey said:
He was also toying with starting a last minute war with Iran as well. Just for the hell of it.0 -
Still surprised people on here argued he was a stabilising influence on the world. Genuinely. Worries me a bit.First.Aspect said:
Ordered to plan. Not the same as having time to do it. Hopefully.rick_chasey said:
He was also toying with starting a last minute war with Iran as well. Just for the hell of it.0 -
Yeah, bit of a stretch I suppose but all relative.rick_chasey said:
Still surprised people on here argued he was a stabilising influence on the world. Genuinely. Worries me a bit.First.Aspect said:
Ordered to plan. Not the same as having time to do it. Hopefully.rick_chasey said:
He was also toying with starting a last minute war with Iran as well. Just for the hell of it.
Compared to his predecessors he didn't start any wars or ramp up the bombing missions.
Quite a low bar really.0 -
Trump's foreign policy incompetence might be a different flavour to previous presidents, but I don't see a lot of signs that his haphazard "pull the troops out here, launch a raid there" approach has made the world a safer place, or saved any lives. Just ask a Syrian, a Kurd, an Armenian...ballysmate said:
Yeah, bit of a stretch I suppose but all relative.rick_chasey said:
Still surprised people on here argued he was a stabilising influence on the world. Genuinely. Worries me a bit.First.Aspect said:
Ordered to plan. Not the same as having time to do it. Hopefully.rick_chasey said:
He was also toying with starting a last minute war with Iran as well. Just for the hell of it.
Compared to his predecessors he didn't start any wars or ramp up the bombing missions.
Quite a low bar really.0 -
I wonder how many of his friends from around the world will stay in contact now he hasn't got the fancy job title.0
-
I did say it was a low bar and not making him out to be any humanitarian.😉bompington said:
Trump's foreign policy incompetence might be a different flavour to previous presidents, but I don't see a lot of signs that his haphazard "pull the troops out here, launch a raid there" approach has made the world a safer place, or saved any lives. Just ask a Syrian, a Kurd, an Armenian...ballysmate said:
Yeah, bit of a stretch I suppose but all relative.rick_chasey said:
Still surprised people on here argued he was a stabilising influence on the world. Genuinely. Worries me a bit.First.Aspect said:
Ordered to plan. Not the same as having time to do it. Hopefully.rick_chasey said:
He was also toying with starting a last minute war with Iran as well. Just for the hell of it.
Compared to his predecessors he didn't start any wars or ramp up the bombing missions.
Quite a low bar really.
Could you say that the world was a safer place following the Bush or Obama administrations?0 -
They will still buy his apartments to launder their money. Until the bank repossesses the lot and they send men to knock on his door asking for their money back.kingstongraham said:I wonder how many of his friends from around the world will stay in contact now he hasn't got the fancy job title.
0 -
Bush no, Obama maybe. But they both played the cards they were dealt. Trump hasnt had many, partly through disinterest, but he has still managed to arbitrarily make things a bit worse, e.g. on a whim if he has a bad hair day or if someone at CNN says something horrid about him.ballysmate said:
I did say it was a low bar and not making him out to be any humanitarian.😉bompington said:
Trump's foreign policy incompetence might be a different flavour to previous presidents, but I don't see a lot of signs that his haphazard "pull the troops out here, launch a raid there" approach has made the world a safer place, or saved any lives. Just ask a Syrian, a Kurd, an Armenian...ballysmate said:
Yeah, bit of a stretch I suppose but all relative.rick_chasey said:
Still surprised people on here argued he was a stabilising influence on the world. Genuinely. Worries me a bit.First.Aspect said:
Ordered to plan. Not the same as having time to do it. Hopefully.rick_chasey said:
He was also toying with starting a last minute war with Iran as well. Just for the hell of it.
Compared to his predecessors he didn't start any wars or ramp up the bombing missions.
Quite a low bar really.
Could you say that the world was a safer place following the Bush or Obama administrations?0 -
Bomber Obama?First.Aspect said:
Bush no, Obama maybe. But they both played the cards they were dealt. Trump hasnt had many, partly through disinterest, but he has still managed to arbitrarily make things a bit worse, e.g. on a whim if he has a bad hair day or if someone at CNN says something horrid about him.ballysmate said:
I did say it was a low bar and not making him out to be any humanitarian.😉bompington said:
Trump's foreign policy incompetence might be a different flavour to previous presidents, but I don't see a lot of signs that his haphazard "pull the troops out here, launch a raid there" approach has made the world a safer place, or saved any lives. Just ask a Syrian, a Kurd, an Armenian...ballysmate said:
Yeah, bit of a stretch I suppose but all relative.rick_chasey said:
Still surprised people on here argued he was a stabilising influence on the world. Genuinely. Worries me a bit.First.Aspect said:
Ordered to plan. Not the same as having time to do it. Hopefully.rick_chasey said:
He was also toying with starting a last minute war with Iran as well. Just for the hell of it.
Compared to his predecessors he didn't start any wars or ramp up the bombing missions.
Quite a low bar really.
Could you say that the world was a safer place following the Bush or Obama administrations?0
