Donald Trump
Comments
-
Is he advocating regime change of a NATO member? is that legal?The problem is that Emmanuel suffers from a very low Approval Rating in France, 26%, and an unemployment rate of almost 10%. He was just trying to get onto another subject. By the way, there is no country more Nationalist than France, very proud people-and rightfully so!........
......MAKE FRANCE GREAT AGAIN!@realdonaldtrumpAll lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
Trumps just hedging his bets come 2020 - if he gets kicked out he'll try for President of France instead ...bianchimoon wrote:
Is he advocating regime change of a NATO member? is that legal?The problem is that Emmanuel suffers from a very low Approval Rating in France, 26%, and an unemployment rate of almost 10%. He was just trying to get onto another subject. By the way, there is no country more Nationalist than France, very proud people-and rightfully so!........
......MAKE FRANCE GREAT AGAIN!@realdonaldtrump0 -
Ha! CCN and Acosta sue Trump and WH aides for removing his credentials and straightaway the WH changes its story.
No longer are they citing an altered video from Infowars as their evidence but rather that Acosta asked two questions, which they say Trump answered, and that he disrespected other reporters. No mention now of assaulting an intern.
Obvious problems with WH response is that a) Trump did not answer the questions but made a series of ad hominem remarks about Acosta and others about CNN, and b) the first reporter speaking after Acosta spoke in support of him to which Trump threw more ad hominem comments at the second reporter.
Video clearly shows only one person disrespecting reporters (Trump) and Acosta has widespread support among the press corp.
It's just lie after lie and all a crock of sh1t.0 -
PhilipPirrip wrote:
It's just lie after lie and all a crock of sh1t.
What makes you say that?
EVIDENCE?Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
He can't even get his lies in order.....
The White House said the presidential helicopter had been grounded by the weather and Mr Trump did not want to cause traffic jams with a hastily arranged motorcade.
Mr Trump contradicted this explanation on Tuesday, tweeting: “I suggested driving. Secret Service said NO, too far from airport and big Paris shutdown.”
(The Independent, today)
He's such a bell end.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Matthewfalle wrote:He can't even get his lies in order.....
The White House said the presidential helicopter had been grounded by the weather and Mr Trump did not want to cause traffic jams with a hastily arranged motorcade.
Mr Trump contradicted this explanation on Tuesday, tweeting: “I suggested driving. Secret Service said NO, too far from airport and big Paris shutdown.”
(The Independent, today)
He's such a bell end.
Well from what you say it is not HIS lies!
Can't even get your criticism in order! ...take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
PhilipPirrip wrote:Ha! CCN and Acosta sue Trump and WH aides for removing his credentials and straightaway the WH changes its story.
No longer are they citing an altered video from Infowars as their evidence but rather that Acosta asked two questions, which they say Trump answered, and that he disrespected other reporters. No mention now of assaulting an intern.
Obvious problems with WH response is that a) Trump did not answer the questions but made a series of ad hominem remarks about Acosta and others about CNN, and b) the first reporter speaking after Acosta spoke in support of him to which Trump threw more ad hominem comments at the second reporter.
Video clearly shows only one person disrespecting reporters (Trump) and Acosta has widespread support among the press corp.
It's just lie after lie and all a crock of sh1t.
This episode just does not matter one bit and I really hope that Acosta is not allowed back in. Do you really think that CCN (sic) would sue a head of state - that won't fit the business model of news reporting at all?. Happy to be shown the writ and very interested on what is the substance of the suit.
Meanwhile the PM has just struck a deal with Europe without involving her ministers....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0 -
Ministers vote on weds.0
-
You expect Fishbot to get his facts straight?
Or even come close?I don't do smileys.
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
London Calling on Facebook
Parktools0 -
5 days of fury for Drumph, seems he's on a mental downward spiral (again), slapping down Theresa May when she called to congratulate him, having a go at Macron, blaming Kelly for for cemetery visit debacle, apparently he's holed up in the WH, sat in a corner sucking his thumb blaming everyone and everything and refusing to have his diaper changed, his aides don't know what to do.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 9f63e5eafcAll lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
Now malaria Drumph wants a national security aide, who she's never met fired.. just another day in the WH
EDIT, BR spellchecker changed that to Malaria... very good All lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
bianchimoon wrote:EDIT, BR spellchecker changed that to Malaria... very good
One of the rare occasions when spellcheck can actually improve on something...
0 -
To be fair, if a journalist is not going to give the mic back until Trump has answered a question, it's going to be a very long press conference. Problem is, they don't get to even ask a question before being shouted at about witch hunts.
My favourite cringe moment from the press conference was when a Lebanese reporter asked him about Erdogan, and he pretended not to understand his accent when the journalist clarified who Erdogan is. "I just can't understand you."0 -
PhilipPirrip wrote:Ha! CCN and Acosta sue Trump and WH aides for removing his credentials and straightaway the WH changes its story.
No longer are they citing an altered video from Infowars as their evidence but rather that Acosta asked two questions, which they say Trump answered, and that he disrespected other reporters. No mention now of assaulting an intern.
Obvious problems with WH response is that a) Trump did not answer the questions but made a series of ad hominem remarks about Acosta and others about CNN, and b) the first reporter speaking after Acosta spoke in support of him to which Trump threw more ad hominem comments at the second reporter.
Video clearly shows only one person disrespecting reporters (Trump) and Acosta has widespread support among the press corp.
It's just lie after lie and all a crock of sh1t.
Michael Avenatti, a chief critic of US president Donald Trump and the lawyer for porn actress Stormy Daniels, has been released from police custody following his arrest on a domestic violence charge in Los Angeles.Police declined to provide any details about the alleged victim, including that person's relationship to Avenatti.
As he left the police station on Wednesday, Avenatti said he had never hit a woman and said he has been an advocate for women's rights his entire career.
"I wish to thank the hard working men and woman of the LAPD for their professionalism and their work today. They had no option in light of the allegations," Avenatti said.
Nevertheless damage has been caused:The Vermont Democratic Party cancelled events planned for Friday and Saturday, where Avenatti was scheduled to speak, and is refunding ticket sales.0 -
As has been said elsewhere innocent people like Avenatti and Mueller welcome investigations of any such allegations, only those with something to hide would do everything they can to avoid such allegations being investigated.
I've seen Jacob Wohl's name being thrown about regarding this latest allegation.0 -
PhilipPirrip wrote:As has been said elsewhere innocent people like Avenatti and Mueller welcome investigations of any such allegations, only those with something to hide would do everything they can to avoid such allegations being investigated.
I've seen Jacob Wohl's name being thrown about regarding this latest allegation.
His 'company' seems to be taking credit. For something...
https://twitter.com/SurefireIntel/statu ... 98465?s=01I don't do smileys.
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
London Calling on Facebook
Parktools0 -
It might not be such a bad thing if he were taken out of the running for suggestions for Democratic candidates for 2020 - the installation of an outsider for the Republicans hasn't been an unmitigated success, and though he certainly has a public profile, and is a fighter, Avenatti might not be the best person to get US democracy sorted after the disaster of Trump for norms and institutions.Robert88 wrote:PhilipPirrip wrote:Ha! CCN and Acosta sue Trump and WH aides for removing his credentials and straightaway the WH changes its story.
No longer are they citing an altered video from Infowars as their evidence but rather that Acosta asked two questions, which they say Trump answered, and that he disrespected other reporters. No mention now of assaulting an intern.
Obvious problems with WH response is that a) Trump did not answer the questions but made a series of ad hominem remarks about Acosta and others about CNN, and b) the first reporter speaking after Acosta spoke in support of him to which Trump threw more ad hominem comments at the second reporter.
Video clearly shows only one person disrespecting reporters (Trump) and Acosta has widespread support among the press corp.
It's just lie after lie and all a crock of sh1t.
Michael Avenatti, a chief critic of US president Donald Trump and the lawyer for porn actress Stormy Daniels, has been released from police custody following his arrest on a domestic violence charge in Los Angeles.Police declined to provide any details about the alleged victim, including that person's relationship to Avenatti.
As he left the police station on Wednesday, Avenatti said he had never hit a woman and said he has been an advocate for women's rights his entire career.
"I wish to thank the hard working men and woman of the LAPD for their professionalism and their work today. They had no option in light of the allegations," Avenatti said.
Nevertheless damage has been caused:The Vermont Democratic Party cancelled events planned for Friday and Saturday, where Avenatti was scheduled to speak, and is refunding ticket sales.0 -
He's having a tweet storm at the moment, reading between the lines, seems like it's 'getting close to home' , Don jnr will look so cute in an orange jump suit:DAll lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0
-
"Why won't this investigation go beyond its remit??? And also not investigate things that are within its remit please."0
-
He does appear to be concentrating on prison reform for some reason.bianchimoon wrote:He's having a tweet storm at the moment, reading between the lines, seems like it's 'getting close to home' , Don jnr will look so cute in an orange jump suit:DThe above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
If his tweet "the inner workings of the Mueller investigation are a total mess" means he actually knows something about the 'inner workings' that he must be getting insider information (it's the first time he's mentioned Mueller by name I think?).
If he's getting info it must be coming from his new AG, which would have compromised the investigation as trump is the subject?All lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
As an aside, I notice that Dotard hasn't mentioned all the new N Korean missile base things and bomb stuff that they are doing when they weren't meant to following his dramatic and ever so successful love in with mad kim mcmad jung mad.
SHOCKPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
he did put a tweet out about it, saying they knew all about it and it was fake newsMatthewfalle wrote:As an aside, I notice that Dotard hasn't mentioned all the new N Korean missile base things and bomb stuff that they are doing when they weren't meant to following his dramatic and ever so successful love in with mad kim mcmad jung mad.
SHOCKAll lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
bianchimoon wrote:
he did put a tweet out about it, saying they knew all about it and it was fake newsMatthewfalle wrote:As an aside, I notice that Dotard hasn't mentioned all the new N Korean missile base things and bomb stuff that they are doing when they weren't meant to following his dramatic and ever so successful love in with mad kim mcmad jung mad.
SHOCK
Sorry - was the fact they knew about it fake news, the bomb site things fake news or the tweet fake news? Or all of the above.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Matthewfalle wrote:bianchimoon wrote:
he did put a tweet out about it, saying they knew all about it and it was fake newsMatthewfalle wrote:As an aside, I notice that Dotard hasn't mentioned all the new N Korean missile base things and bomb stuff that they are doing when they weren't meant to following his dramatic and ever so successful love in with mad kim mcmad jung mad.
SHOCK
Sorry - was the fact they knew about it fake news, the bomb site things fake news or the tweet fake news? Or all of the above.
take your pick, if you can make sense if him you're a better man than meDonald J. Trump Verified account@realDonaldTrump
The story in the New York Times concerning North Korea developing missile bases is inaccurate. We fully know about the sites being discussed, nothing new - and nothing happening out of the normal. Just more Fake News. I will be the first to let you know if things go bad!All lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....0 -
The story is generally true but missing some info.bianchimoon wrote:Matthewfalle wrote:bianchimoon wrote:
he did put a tweet out about it, saying they knew all about it and it was fake newsMatthewfalle wrote:As an aside, I notice that Dotard hasn't mentioned all the new N Korean missile base things and bomb stuff that they are doing when they weren't meant to following his dramatic and ever so successful love in with mad kim mcmad jung mad.
SHOCK
Sorry - was the fact they knew about it fake news, the bomb site things fake news or the tweet fake news? Or all of the above.
take your pick, if you can make sense if him you're a better man than meDonald J. Trump Verified account@realDonaldTrump
The story in the New York Times concerning North Korea developing missile bases is inaccurate. We fully know about the sites being discussed, nothing new - and nothing happening out of the normal. Just more Fake News. I will be the first to let you know if things go bad!
We know the bases are there, and have done for some time.
Fake news is me letting you know.
If things go bad, I’ll be in a bunker.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
If things ever went truly bad and retreat to the bunkers happened for the most valuable people to the surviving society. Is Trump the first us president that would deliberately get left outside?0
-
PBlakeney wrote:
The story is generally true but missing some info.bianchimoon wrote:Matthewfalle wrote:bianchimoon wrote:
he did put a tweet out about it, saying they knew all about it and it was fake newsMatthewfalle wrote:As an aside, I notice that Dotard hasn't mentioned all the new N Korean missile base things and bomb stuff that they are doing when they weren't meant to following his dramatic and ever so successful love in with mad kim mcmad jung mad.
SHOCK
Sorry - was the fact they knew about it fake news, the bomb site things fake news or the tweet fake news? Or all of the above.
take your pick, if you can make sense if him you're a better man than meDonald J. Trump Verified account@realDonaldTrump
The story in the New York Times concerning North Korea developing missile bases is inaccurate. We fully know about the sites being discussed, nothing new - and nothing happening out of the normal. Just more Fake News. I will be the first to let you know if things go bad!
We know the bases are there, and have done for some time.
Fake news is me letting you know.
If things go bad, I’ll be in a bunker, but only if I don't have to walk in the rain to get there.
ftfyPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
bianchimoon wrote:Matthewfalle wrote:bianchimoon wrote:
he did put a tweet out about it, saying they knew all about it and it was fake newsMatthewfalle wrote:As an aside, I notice that Dotard hasn't mentioned all the new N Korean missile base things and bomb stuff that they are doing when they weren't meant to following his dramatic and ever so successful love in with mad kim mcmad jung mad.
SHOCK
Sorry - was the fact they knew about it fake news, the bomb site things fake news or the tweet fake news? Or all of the above.
take your pick, if you can make sense if him you're a better man than meDonald J. Trump Verified account@realDonaldTrump
The story in the New York Times concerning North Korea developing missile bases is inaccurate. We fully know about the sites being discussed, nothing new - and nothing happening out of the normal. Just more Fake News. I will be the first to let you know if things go bad!
ah - gotcha. grazie mille.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
bianchimoon wrote:take your pick, if you can make sense if him you're a better man than me
Most people are without taking picks.
..or pick elves for that matter....take your pickelf on your holibobs....
jeez :roll:0
