Donald Trump

1115116118120121550

Comments

  • Sam Clovis, Trump’s nominee for USDA’s top scientist, confirms he has no hard science credentials
    Dump's war on science and use of qualified people continues, the man is an ex radio host ffs. Still I guess he's more qualified than Dump

    And he's gone before he started, because of Russia.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/02/polit ... index.html
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,312
    Sam Clovis, Trump’s nominee for USDA’s top scientist, confirms he has no hard science credentials
    Dump's war on science and use of qualified people continues, the man is an ex radio host ffs. Still I guess he's more qualified than Dump

    And he's gone before he started, because of Russia.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/02/polit ... index.html

    He'll run out of people to appoint at this rate. Perhaps Tangled Metal has a genuine chance after all.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • From Twitter:
    - Russian colluder vanishes
    - Sam Clovis nomination withdrawn
    - Robert Mercer resigns
    - Both could be indicted
    - Proof Russia hacked DNC
    - Breitbart has been sold
    - Rick Perry is awful
    - Tax plan is a joke
    - Michael Flynn arrest coming
    - It's only 1pm
    My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
    https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
    Facebook? No. Just say no.
  • Sam Clovis, Trump’s nominee for USDA’s top scientist, confirms he has no hard science credentials
    Dump's war on science and use of qualified people continues, the man is an ex radio host ffs. Still I guess he's more qualified than Dump

    And he's gone before he started, because of Russia.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/02/polit ... index.html
    And yet someone orange bloke keeps telling us the Russia probe is all a hoax.
  • If Trumps not careful I might be the only one eligible for a position in the administration.

    I'm waiting for the call, but I won't take a measly pay off post now I'm in a better position of power. I mean his nominees are dropping off like flies. :wink:
  • letap73
    letap73 Posts: 1,608
    According to Breitbart it looks like Hillary and the democrats colluded with the Russians to obviously destroy their own campaign:

    http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2017/11/ ... th-russia/
  • letap73
    letap73 Posts: 1,608
    Pinno wrote:
    letap73 wrote:
    letap73 wrote:
    A few more weeks and we can merge this one with the Brexit thread.

    Et viola:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Analytica

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... y-alliance

    maybe by the end of this week then..

    Congratulations Nostradamus:

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... referendum

    It was me. I chucked the pigeon in amongst the cats in the Brexit thread :oops:

    I look forward to Coopster expressing his man love for the Trumpster on this thread.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,312
    letap73 wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    letap73 wrote:
    letap73 wrote:
    A few more weeks and we can merge this one with the Brexit thread.

    Et viola:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Analytica

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... y-alliance

    maybe by the end of this week then..

    Congratulations Nostradamus:

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... referendum

    It was me. I chucked the pigeon in amongst the cats in the Brexit thread :oops:

    I look forward to Coopster expressing his man love for the Trumpster on this thread.

    The idea that a malevolent external power has possibly been funding Farage's side of the campaign has so far been met with dismissal and described as 'meaningless'.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • letap73
    letap73 Posts: 1,608
    Before the referendum vote there were lots on rabid pro brexiters on both the Telegraph and Guardian comment sites - who happened to also comment on topics touching upon Russia, the number of comments usually exceeeded the number on football match reports. The Telegraph effectively bowderlised it comments section, the Guardian wrote an article on Russian trolling - which led to some interesting comments. Arron Banks source of finance for the leave campaign has been questioned. The British orange one also appears to have interesting links.
  • letap73 wrote:
    According to Breitbart it looks like Hillary and the democrats colluded with the Russians to obviously destroy their own campaign:

    http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2017/11/ ... th-russia/

    Now it turns out the $12,000,000 that "THE DEMS" paid for the report was actually $168,000.
  • robert88
    robert88 Posts: 2,696
    Robert88 wrote:
    Saw some leak that he wants to name the tax bill “cuts cuts cuts” but no one else agrees.

    I thought it was a spoof but no.

    Yes, me too, I had to google search it to make sure.

    Anyway, I am looking forward to coverage of his Asian tour. It should be a hoot provided WW3 doesn't break out.

    The Middle East tour was a damp squib. Like when a sitcom does a special "abroad" episode.

    Indeed, we were all set for the annihilation of Qatar when Trump suddenly discovered it had a rather large US airbase and called the whole thing off. It was close though.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436
    The time when America stopped being great

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41826022
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,320
    The time when America stopped being great

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41826022
    There is a lot in there, but I'd go with 2000.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • FishFish
    FishFish Posts: 2,152
    What a bunch of moronic comments.
    ...take your pickelf on your holibobs.... :D

    jeez :roll:
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    FishFish wrote:
    What a bunch of moronic comments.

    So persuasive.
  • robert88
    robert88 Posts: 2,696
    FishFish wrote:
    What a bunch of moronic comments.

    So persuasive.

    Look at FF's posts and adjust your expectations!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,320
    Robert88 wrote:
    FishFish wrote:
    What a bunch of moronic comments.

    So persuasive.

    Look at FF's posts and adjust your expectations!
    FFS
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,312
    PBlakeney wrote:
    The time when America stopped being great

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41826022
    There is a lot in there, but I'd go with 2000.

    Really?!

    Let's wind the clock back to the second world war. You know, the one they reluctantly joined in despite knowledge of the Holocaust (and we had to re-pay them right up until 1999).
    Then came the Korean war and General McCarthy's antics. Then the Vietnam war, the use of Napalm, Agent Orange:
    2m Vietnamese deaths, 56,000 US deaths.

    We can chuck in the Contra affair, interference with African states, the long standing mis-treatment of Cuba, the constant meddling in Central and South American governments, the assassination of Che Guevara and the constant and eternal paranoia.
    I know there has been a rise in shootings but we can wind the clock back to 1971 that nutter who got people to drink cyanide in a mass suicide event, the same year that wossisname - Archer Blood, an American diplomat and the murders of Hindu and Bengali's.
    Why did the world have to live through the cloud of the Cold War? It wasn't purely the threat of Russian aggression.
    Iraq - what a complete and utter f*ck up... Iraqi deaths due to US invasion: 1.3m. (http://markhumphrys.com/iraq.dead.html).
    Union Carbide - another case of American NIMBY, not a penny paid in compensation.
    Domestically, there has always been huge inequality. Not everybody has access to healthcare. The gap between the richest and the poorest is massive.

    I know these are random and sometimes unrelated but these are just off the top of my head.

    Some gun stats:

    The statistics
    Mass shootings: There were 372 mass shootings in the US in 2015, killing 475 people and wounding 1,870, according to the Mass Shooting Tracker, which catalogues such incidents. A mass shooting is defined as a single shooting incident which kills or injures four or more people, including the assailant.
    Source: Mass Shooting Tracker
    School shootings: There were 64 school shootings in 2015, according to a dedicated campaign group set up in the wake of the Sandy Hook elementary school massacre in Connecticut in 2012. Those figures include occasions when a gun was fired but no-one was hurt.
    Source: Everytown for Gun SafetyResearch
    All shootings: Some 13,286 people were killed in the US by firearms in 2015, according to the Gun Violence Archive, and 26,819 people were injured [those figures exclude suicide]. Those figures are likely to rise by several hundred, once incidents in the final week of the year are counted.
    Source: Gun Violence Archive
    How the US compares: The number of gun murders per capita in the US in 2012 - the most recent year for comparable statistics - was nearly 30 times that in the UK, at 2.9 per 100,000 compared with just 0.1.
    Of all the murders in the US in 2012, 60% were by firearm compared with 31% in Canada, 18.2% in Australia, and just 10% in the UK.
    Source: UNODC.

    When you read that ^, they are a bunch of f*cking nutters. Mainly given there god damn right to carry guns and the over whelming lack of motivation to curb it.

    "2. The cumulative number
    Comparisons can help us to understand scale. Since 1968, when these figures were first collected, there have been 1,516,863 gun-related deaths on US territory. Since the founding of the United States, there have been 1,396,733 war deaths. " Source: Small Arms Survey.

    The American Government has always been for the elite and the corporations which makes the appointment of Trump totally ironic. Nothing has changed. I find it amusing when the commentators give the reason for his election victory as a vote against the status quo.

    Has America ever really been 'great'?
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337
    Pinno wrote:
    PBlakeney wrote:
    The time when America stopped being great

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41826022
    There is a lot in there, but I'd go with 2000.

    Really?!

    Let's wind the clock back to the second world war. You know, the one they reluctantly joined in despite knowledge of the Holocaust (and we had to re-pay them right up until 1999).
    Then came the Korean war and General McCarthy's antics. Then the Vietnam war, the use of Napalm, Agent Orange:
    2m Vietnamese deaths, 56,000 US deaths.

    We can chuck in the Contra affair, interference with African states, the long standing mis-treatment of Cuba, the constant meddling in Central and South American governments, the assassination of Che Guevara and the constant and eternal paranoia.
    I know there has been a rise in shootings but we can wind the clock back to 1971 that nutter who got people to drink cyanide in a mass suicide event, the same year that wossisname - Archer Blood, an American diplomat and the murders of Hindu and Bengali's.
    Why did the world have to live through the cloud of the Cold War? It wasn't purely the threat of Russian aggression.
    Iraq - what a complete and utter f*ck up... Iraqi deaths due to US invasion: 1.3m. (http://markhumphrys.com/iraq.dead.html).
    Union Carbide - another case of American NIMBY, not a penny paid in compensation.
    Domestically, there has always been huge inequality. Not everybody has access to healthcare. The gap between the richest and the poorest is massive.

    I know these are random and sometimes unrelated but these are just off the top of my head.

    Some gun stats:

    The statistics
    Mass shootings: There were 372 mass shootings in the US in 2015, killing 475 people and wounding 1,870, according to the Mass Shooting Tracker, which catalogues such incidents. A mass shooting is defined as a single shooting incident which kills or injures four or more people, including the assailant.
    Source: Mass Shooting Tracker
    School shootings: There were 64 school shootings in 2015, according to a dedicated campaign group set up in the wake of the Sandy Hook elementary school massacre in Connecticut in 2012. Those figures include occasions when a gun was fired but no-one was hurt.
    Source: Everytown for Gun SafetyResearch
    All shootings: Some 13,286 people were killed in the US by firearms in 2015, according to the Gun Violence Archive, and 26,819 people were injured [those figures exclude suicide]. Those figures are likely to rise by several hundred, once incidents in the final week of the year are counted.
    Source: Gun Violence Archive
    How the US compares: The number of gun murders per capita in the US in 2012 - the most recent year for comparable statistics - was nearly 30 times that in the UK, at 2.9 per 100,000 compared with just 0.1.
    Of all the murders in the US in 2012, 60% were by firearm compared with 31% in Canada, 18.2% in Australia, and just 10% in the UK.
    Source: UNODC.

    When you read that ^, they are a bunch of f*cking nutters. Mainly given there god damn right to carry guns and the over whelming lack of motivation to curb it.

    "2. The cumulative number
    Comparisons can help us to understand scale. Since 1968, when these figures were first collected, there have been 1,516,863 gun-related deaths on US territory. Since the founding of the United States, there have been 1,396,733 war deaths. " Source: Small Arms Survey.

    The American Government has always been for the elite and the corporations which makes the appointment of Trump totally ironic. Nothing has changed. I find it amusing when the commentators give the reason for his election victory as a vote against the status quo.

    Has America ever really been 'great'?
    Pinno for President. Drain The Swamp. America's Never Been Great Anyway.

    How could you lose?
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,320
    Pinno wrote:
    A load of stuff.
    Name any empire that didn't have negatives at any point in time. It was only my opinion.
    It remains my opinion that however "great" the U.S. was, it has been downhill since 2000.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,312
    PBlakeney wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    A load of stuff.
    Name any empire that didn't have negatives at any point in time. It was only my opinion.
    It remains my opinion that however "great" the U.S. was, it has been downhill since 2000.

    Since when has the US been an Empire? They're simply not good enough to do that sort of thing anyway.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,312
    edited November 2017
    ...
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,312
    Pinno wrote:
    ...more stuff than 2 sentences written by Blakey...
    Pinno for President. Drain The Swamp. America's Never Been Great Anyway.
    Pinno for President. Drain The Swamp. America's Never Been Great Anyway.[/quote]

    I'm glad you see sense.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,320
    Pinno wrote:
    PBlakeney wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    A load of stuff.
    Name any empire that didn't have negatives at any point in time. It was only my opinion.
    It remains my opinion that however "great" the U.S. was, it has been downhill since 2000.

    Since when has the US been an Empire? They're simply not good enough to do that sort of thing anyway.
    Well, World leaders, or whatever term you prefer.
    In their eyes certainly. I'm sure some think Team America: World Police was based on reality. :lol:
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    ...more stuff than 2 sentences written by Blakey...
    Pinno for President. Drain The Swamp. America's Never Been Great Anyway.

    I'm glad you see sense.
    Will you pay for me to go to Moscow, or do I need my own secret source of (illegal) funds?
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,312
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    ...more stuff than 2 sentences written by Blakey...
    Pinno for President. Drain The Swamp. America's Never Been Great Anyway.

    I'm glad you see sense.
    Will you pay for me to go to Moscow, or do I need my own secret source of (illegal) funds?

    Hell, if yur brave enuff to go to Moskauw and kick sum Rusky butt, i'll pay you in prostitutes, Cocaine tax proceeds and Cuban seegars.
    Damn, let slip sum policy stuff there. Silly me.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,320
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    ...more stuff than 2 sentences written by Blakey...
    Pinno for President. Drain The Swamp. America's Never Been Great Anyway.

    I'm glad you see sense.
    Will you pay for me to go to Moscow, or do I need my own secret source of (illegal) funds?

    Hell, if yur brave enuff to go to Moskauw and kick sum Rusky butt, i'll pay you in prostitutes, Cocaine tax proceeds and Cuban seegars.
    Damn, let slip sum policy stuff there. Silly me.
    Sounds familiar...
    Did you, or Donald, get your tax planning from the Armageddon wage demands? :lol:
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    ...more stuff than 2 sentences written by Blakey...
    Pinno for President. Drain The Swamp. America's Never Been Great Anyway.

    I'm glad you see sense.
    Will you pay for me to go to Moscow, or do I need my own secret source of (illegal) funds?

    Hell, if yur brave enuff to go to Moskauw and kick sum Rusky butt, i'll pay you in prostitutes, Cocaine tax proceeds and Cuban seegars.
    Damn, let slip sum policy stuff there. Silly me.
    If you dig deep enough you will find a photo or two of me with a one-time UK Ambassador to Moscow. So my CV's pretty good at this stage...
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,312
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    ...more stuff than 2 sentences written by Blakey...
    Pinno for President. Drain The Swamp. America's Never Been Great Anyway.

    I'm glad you see sense.
    Will you pay for me to go to Moscow, or do I need my own secret source of (illegal) funds?

    Hell, if yur brave enuff to go to Moskauw and kick sum Rusky butt, i'll pay you in prostitutes, Cocaine tax proceeds and Cuban seegars.
    Damn, let slip sum policy stuff there. Silly me.
    If you dig deep enough you will find a photo or two of me with a one-time UK Ambassador to Moscow. So my CV's pretty good at this stage...

    Okay, okay, you got the job.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,337
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    Pinno wrote:
    ...more stuff than 2 sentences written by Blakey...
    Pinno for President. Drain The Swamp. America's Never Been Great Anyway.

    I'm glad you see sense.
    Will you pay for me to go to Moscow, or do I need my own secret source of (illegal) funds?

    Hell, if yur brave enuff to go to Moskauw and kick sum Rusky butt, i'll pay you in prostitutes, Cocaine tax proceeds and Cuban seegars.
    Damn, let slip sum policy stuff there. Silly me.
    If you dig deep enough you will find a photo or two of me with a one-time UK Ambassador to Moscow. So my CV's pretty good at this stage...

    Okay, okay, you got the job.
    So, who would I be answering to... you, or Robert Mueller?