Join the Labour Party and save your country!
Comments
-
Given who was in charge of Labour in the early 80's, I would have started a very similar thread back then had the internet existed"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0
-
-
Rick Chasey wrote:We done the first MP to be jailed in 20 odd years?
https://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=40088&t=13102131"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Massively leave and a super tight swing seat.
Gonna be a mess, especially given how tight Parliament is.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Massively leave and a super tight swing seat.
Gonna be a mess, especially given how tight Parliament is.
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/elections/2019/01/who-ll-win-peterborough-election-well-there-might-not-even-be-one"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Wasn't there talk of the Tories splitting not too long ago. Didn't happen and I doubt it'll happen with labour again.0
-
Tangled Metal wrote:Wasn't there talk of the Tories splitting not too long ago. Didn't happen and I doubt it'll happen with labour again.
Mugs game predicting anything in politics at the moment apart from May refusing to deviate from the same path she chose in 1968.0 -
Vince Cable is quoted in the morning free rag as working with both Tory and Labour MPs to 'stop Brexit and try to get a peoples vote'. Sounds like something is going on, but whether it will actually happen is another matter.
Cable goes on to say 'There is a much bigger group of Labour MPs who are deeply unhappy with Jeremy Corbyn's leadership and don't see any future in the party'. No sh1t, Sherlock."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:Vince Cable is quoted in the morning free rag as working with both Tory and Labour MPs to 'stop Brexit and try to get a peoples vote'. Sounds like something is going on, but whether it will actually happen is another matter.
Cable goes on to say 'There is a much bigger group of Labour MPs who are deeply unhappy with Jeremy Corbyn's leadership and don't see any future in the party'. No sh1t, Sherlock.
Was reading about the amount of abuse Jess Phillips gets from Corbynists. I think most would describe her as a left-winger but because she doesn't have undying enthusiasm for the dear leader, she's considered 'worse than the Tories'. And for all St Jeremy's piety he had to be embarrassed into voting against the immigration bill by Phillips.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
you guys mentioned the polls yet?
Tories **up** by 4 points.
System is officially broken.
How does some of the most pathetic governance modern U.K. democracy has ever seen, result in the responsible party improving their polling?0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:you guys mentioned the polls yet?
Tories **up** by 4 points.
System is officially broken.
How does some of the most pathetic governance modern U.K. democracy has ever seen, result in the responsible party improving their polling?
A question for Jeremy Corbyn to think about.Faster than a tent.......0 -
Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
I think the current situation is the logical conclusion of constantly depicting the other side as 'scum'. The core supporters become more entrenched and those in the middle recoil in disgust at what both options have become. That stasis means no party has a reason to reach out or improve their offer. The Conservatives just happened to be sat down when the music stopped.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
Well yes - two party system (at the moment, in the minds of many. Eg those who seriously think that the tuition fees issue during the coalition isn't a totally insignificant error on the part of the Lib Dems compared to what Corbyn, Cameron, May et al have been up to since).Faster than a tent.......0 -
@Rick, yep, got the Tory poll lead covered as well a page or so back:Stevo 666 wrote:Meanwhile in the polls and outside the Cake Stop echo chamber
https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2019/feb/02/labour-slumps-in-polls-as-tories-open-biggest-lead-since-general-election"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Vince Cable is quoted in the morning free rag as working with both Tory and Labour MPs to 'stop Brexit and try to get a peoples vote'. Sounds like something is going on, but whether it will actually happen is another matter.
Cable goes on to say 'There is a much bigger group of Labour MPs who are deeply unhappy with Jeremy Corbyn's leadership and don't see any future in the party'. No sh1t, Sherlock.
Was reading about the amount of abuse Jess Phillips gets from Corbynists. I think most would describe her as a left-winger but because she doesn't have undying enthusiasm for the dear leader, she's considered 'worse than the Tories'. And for all St Jeremy's piety he had to be embarrassed into voting against the immigration bill by Phillips."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Vince Cable is quoted in the morning free rag as working with both Tory and Labour MPs to 'stop Brexit and try to get a peoples vote'. Sounds like something is going on, but whether it will actually happen is another matter.
Cable goes on to say 'There is a much bigger group of Labour MPs who are deeply unhappy with Jeremy Corbyn's leadership and don't see any future in the party'. No sh1t, Sherlock.
Was reading about the amount of abuse Jess Phillips gets from Corbynists. I think most would describe her as a left-winger but because she doesn't have undying enthusiasm for the dear leader, she's considered 'worse than the Tories'. And for all St Jeremy's piety he had to be embarrassed into voting against the immigration bill by Phillips.
Bloody Corbyn voters.0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:rjsterry wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Vince Cable is quoted in the morning free rag as working with both Tory and Labour MPs to 'stop Brexit and try to get a peoples vote'. Sounds like something is going on, but whether it will actually happen is another matter.
Cable goes on to say 'There is a much bigger group of Labour MPs who are deeply unhappy with Jeremy Corbyn's leadership and don't see any future in the party'. No sh1t, Sherlock.
Was reading about the amount of abuse Jess Phillips gets from Corbynists. I think most would describe her as a left-winger but because she doesn't have undying enthusiasm for the dear leader, she's considered 'worse than the Tories'. And for all St Jeremy's piety he had to be embarrassed into voting against the immigration bill by Phillips.
Bloody Corbyn voters."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:KingstonGraham wrote:Bloody Corbyn voters.
To remind everyone who helped make Corbyn a potential PM?0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
If the two biggest parties are so bad then why is it the LibDems aren't in the news now often and doing some good instead of being anonymous like they are. Is their offer no better?0 -
KingstonGraham wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:KingstonGraham wrote:Bloody Corbyn voters.
To remind everyone who helped make Corbyn a potential PM?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Tangled Metal wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
If the two biggest parties are so bad then why is it the LibDems aren't in the news now often and doing some good instead of being anonymous like they are. Is their offer no better?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
If the two biggest parties are so bad then why is it the LibDems aren't in the news now often and doing some good instead of being anonymous like they are. Is their offer no better?
Ironically, the lib dem voters punished the party for going into coalition with the conservatives in 2010 by voting conservative in 2015. Go figure?0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
If the two biggest parties are so bad then why is it the LibDems aren't in the news now often and doing some good instead of being anonymous like they are. Is their offer no better?
Just checking - this is a tongue in cheek comment isn't it?Faster than a tent.......0 -
Apparently I think it was Tusk who reported that Cameron told him that he only put the referendum into their manifesto because he expected to be in coalition with the LibDems again and they'd veto it.0
-
Rolf F wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
If the two biggest parties are so bad then why is it the LibDems aren't in the news now often and doing some good instead of being anonymous like they are. Is their offer no better?
Just checking - this is a tongue in cheek comment isn't it?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
morstar wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
If the two biggest parties are so bad then why is it the LibDems aren't in the news now often and doing some good instead of being anonymous like they are. Is their offer no better?
Ironically, the lib dem voters punished the party for going into coalition with the conservatives in 2010 by voting conservative in 2015. Go figure?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:Rolf F wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
If the two biggest parties are so bad then why is it the LibDems aren't in the news now often and doing some good instead of being anonymous like they are. Is their offer no better?
Just checking - this is a tongue in cheek comment isn't it?Faster than a tent.......0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:morstar wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
If the two biggest parties are so bad then why is it the LibDems aren't in the news now often and doing some good instead of being anonymous like they are. Is their offer no better?
Ironically, the lib dem voters punished the party for going into coalition with the conservatives in 2010 by voting conservative in 2015. Go figure?
But it is generally accepted they got punished at the polls and as 2015 went in favour of the Conservatives...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/politics-blog/11591526/The-Liberal-Democrats-have-been-punished-for-doing-the-right-thing.html0 -
Rolf F wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Rolf F wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Regardless just because Labour is sh!t doesn’t mean the Tories should *gain*.
They should both lose since they are both being appalling. The fact they don’t suggests a proper problem with the system.
If the two biggest parties are so bad then why is it the LibDems aren't in the news now often and doing some good instead of being anonymous like they are. Is their offer no better?
Just checking - this is a tongue in cheek comment isn't it?1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0