Obsessive Compulsive Poser (OCP) guide to bike photos

There are many bike photographs on here but the reference shot must be taken in a specific way otherwise there will be a higher risk of flaming. Plus, it shows your lovely bikes off better!
Don't say I didn't warn you!
1 - Bike should be against a white background, preferable a garage door so the bike shows up properly, or if taken well, a black background with suitable lighting.
2 - Bike must be flat to camera, no silly angles.
3 - Bike must be drive side showing
4 - Chain in big ring, towards the smaller cogs at the back
5 - Crankarm following the line of the seat tube or chainstay
6 - Stem must be in the negative fitting. Even if you ride with it pointing up.
7 - Dork discs, reflectors, pumps, lights etc are NOT acceptable, again, even if you ride with them.
Thiese are examples of a good OCP shot -
My very own bike-

These aren't mine but very good shots -



Whereas this is rather non-OCP...
Don't say I didn't warn you!
1 - Bike should be against a white background, preferable a garage door so the bike shows up properly, or if taken well, a black background with suitable lighting.
2 - Bike must be flat to camera, no silly angles.
3 - Bike must be drive side showing
4 - Chain in big ring, towards the smaller cogs at the back
5 - Crankarm following the line of the seat tube or chainstay
6 - Stem must be in the negative fitting. Even if you ride with it pointing up.
7 - Dork discs, reflectors, pumps, lights etc are NOT acceptable, again, even if you ride with them.
Thiese are examples of a good OCP shot -
My very own bike-

These aren't mine but very good shots -



Whereas this is rather non-OCP...

0
Posts
Most cameras (and especially the people behind them :oops: ) do not cope very well on exposure with a huge expanse of white. Even with sophisticated metering systems, they will calculate to expose to an average mid-grey tone, under-expose, and consequently turn white in to grey - see your first shot
Paricularly noticeable if the subject is very dark like that bike. All the detail is lost in shadow.
The second shot is fine though
PS aren't you going to mention about lining up the valves and logo's on the tyres etc? :roll: :roll:
Gary.
Yes indeed, comments had been made on the above shots regarding tyres and logos, except for the Look, that guy is OCP king...
The front wheel of the Look isn't quite as high as the rear - there's a 0.01 degree slope on the top tube.
He also got flamed for a spacer above the stem.
But if you are going to do it - you may as well do it properly
I am afraid it is one of my OCD tendencies :oops: I used to be quite a keen photographer and I like to see well taken pictures. It frustrates me when people post pictures and ask "what do you think of my bike?" and the photo looks similar to your last example :evil: :evil:
(I was still typing when the seond post was made).
That Look is really nice - and well photographed
Gary.
crank angle a little off....
Besides, the valves aren't at 6 o'clock and there is a bag attached to the handlebars as well as the duff crank angle.
Duh!
It's a fixed gear or single speed!
Some people!
I always thought valves hidden behind the frame was the better option.
The only thing with this is often the valve holes are usually lined up with the wheel decals meaning the decals aren't in the right place...
Oh dear... :roll:
Now, front QR angle is open to debate, as long as the front one is not pointing forward or straight down there seems to be a grey area on this...
The rear is even less regulated...
Or would that be unethical?
Are you going to be airbrushing your bikes next???
Also, that Daccordi belongs to 55/rad as I recall, who posts elsewhere
http://www.renovobikes.com/