End of Tour team grades

RichN95.
RichN95. Posts: 27,253
edited July 2023 in Pro race
I've done this before, but not for a couple of years. It's back!

A
A: Jumbo Visma. The dominant team in cycling, dominated again. They may be disappointed with just one stage win
A: Alpecin. Four stage wins. It’s what they came to do. Van de Poel didn’t even have to try
A: Cofidis. They haven't won a stage for 15 years. They were a joke. Now they’ve won two stages. Let’s hear it for the ‘Dis.
A: UAE. I originally went with a B. Three stage wins and two podium places but not the main prize. I think we have to consider the LBL crash and Yates on the podium elevates the grade.
A Bahrain. Three stage wins and a 6th place coming off a tragedy,

B
B. Bora.Two stage wins and a top ten. The bookies had Hindley on the podium, so maybe he was a disappointment.
B Ineos. Two stage wins and fifth on GC. It’s not the Sky days, but still a respectable performance.
B Lidl. KOM is a very middle aisle prize. Ciccone really earned those spots. Pedersen also got a win.
B Israel PT. If you are a non WT team and you get a stage win, you get a B minimum. And it was a great stage.

C
C: Soudal-QS. They eventually got a stage, but they were largely unnoticed.
C AG2R. Stage win. And Felix Gall is a breakout star
C: Jayco. No headline performance, but Yates came 4th (Although Jimmy Ormond’s sledge to Mark Waugh comes to mind)
C; Lotto. Campanaerts got the Super Combativity prize. Also divorced Caleb Ewan.
C: Groupama-FdJ. Sneaked into 9th place with someone that came 4th last year. No-one in top three in stages

D
D. Arkea. Got a combitvity award.
D. Movistar. Got a combativity award. Mas crashed.
D. Total Energies. Got two combitvity awards
D. EF. Powless provided some fun. Carapaz crashed.

E
E: Uno X. Little expected. Little delivered
E: Astana. It could have been so different with Cavendish who got one second place.

F
F: DSM - thanks for coming. No-one in the top three in any stage.
F: Intermarche - Same as DSM
Twitter: @RichN95
«134

Comments

  • Lanterne_Rogue
    Lanterne_Rogue Posts: 4,334
    If EF are a D so are Astana. Cavendish ensured they got plenty of mentions despite not achieving anything and even after he stopped being relevant - how's that different to Powless?
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,253
    edited July 2023

    If EF are a D so are Astana. Cavendish ensured they got plenty of mentions despite not achieving anything and even after he stopped being relevant - how's that different to Powless?


    Powless wore the Polka dots for 11 stages. That's half the race. I'm starting to think they should be a C.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    Yeah, Lotto & FdJ are punching there.

    I find it interesting that OPQS are trying to become this big new GC team, but their only win came from the most "classics hardman" stage there was! Stick to what you're good at Pat...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,553
    C for AG2R seems a bit harsh, a stage win; a couple of top threes for Ben O'Connor and Gall was 8th on GC is above par, I'd argue.
  • r0bh
    r0bh Posts: 2,438
    You can't give Cofidis an A just because they have historically been terrible and this year they weren't. C+ or B-
  • stage_hunter
    stage_hunter Posts: 317
    That’s a decent stab. Im struggling to see how FDJ and AG2R get the same grade though.
  • wakemalcolm
    wakemalcolm Posts: 911
    RichN95. said:

    If EF are a D so are Astana. Cavendish ensured they got plenty of mentions despite not achieving anything and even after he stopped being relevant - how's that different to Powless?


    Powless wore the Polka dots for 11 stages. That's half the race. I'm starting to think they should be a C.
    They didn't win a stage so they're going to lose all their sponsors; heard it on Netflix.
    ================================
    Cake is just weakness entering the body
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,164
    If you're judging Cofidis in comparison how they've done in the past, you should do the same for Ineos.

    Groupama very lucky to get C having left behind an in form sprinter for a charity pick and building the rest of the team around a 9th place finish.
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,553

    If you're judging Cofidis in comparison how they've done in the past, you should do the same for Ineos.

    Groupama very lucky to get C having left behind an in form sprinter for a charity pick and building the rest of the team around a 9th place finish.

    An in form sprinter? You don't mean Arnaud Demare, surely? He's ridden 24 WT race days this season and his best result is a single second place.
  • davidof
    davidof Posts: 3,123

    If you're judging Cofidis in comparison how they've done in the past, you should do the same for Ineos..

    or add a "team budget" factor? In which case Ineos is more C with some individual great rides. Pidock is probably dissapointed following his breakout win in the mountains last year.

    BASI Nordic Ski Instructor
    Instagramme
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,164
    andyp said:

    If you're judging Cofidis in comparison how they've done in the past, you should do the same for Ineos.

    Groupama very lucky to get C having left behind an in form sprinter for a charity pick and building the rest of the team around a 9th place finish.

    An in form sprinter? You don't mean Arnaud Demare, surely? He's ridden 24 WT race days this season and his best result is a single second place.
    He beat Jordi Meeus in sprints in that second place and his win a week earlier - in the two races just before the TDF which sounds like decent form. Last GT he raced he won the points jersey and three stages. He's the best rider they have.
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,553

    andyp said:

    If you're judging Cofidis in comparison how they've done in the past, you should do the same for Ineos.

    Groupama very lucky to get C having left behind an in form sprinter for a charity pick and building the rest of the team around a 9th place finish.

    An in form sprinter? You don't mean Arnaud Demare, surely? He's ridden 24 WT race days this season and his best result is a single second place.
    He beat Jordi Meeus in sprints in that second place and his win a week earlier - in the two races just before the TDF which sounds like decent form. Last GT he raced he won the points jersey and three stages. He's the best rider they have.
    According to the UCI rankings, he's the fifth best rider they have.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,164
    andyp said:

    andyp said:

    If you're judging Cofidis in comparison how they've done in the past, you should do the same for Ineos.

    Groupama very lucky to get C having left behind an in form sprinter for a charity pick and building the rest of the team around a 9th place finish.

    An in form sprinter? You don't mean Arnaud Demare, surely? He's ridden 24 WT race days this season and his best result is a single second place.
    He beat Jordi Meeus in sprints in that second place and his win a week earlier - in the two races just before the TDF which sounds like decent form. Last GT he raced he won the points jersey and three stages. He's the best rider they have.
    According to the UCI rankings, he's the fifth best rider they have.
    And that tells you what you need to know about uci ranking points.
  • mrb123
    mrb123 Posts: 4,818
    https://www.procyclingstats.com/rankings/me/all-time

    Was quite taken aback by how high Demare ranks on the Pro Cycling Stats all time list - some big names below him. He must have won a lot of races over the years.
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,553

    andyp said:

    andyp said:

    If you're judging Cofidis in comparison how they've done in the past, you should do the same for Ineos.

    Groupama very lucky to get C having left behind an in form sprinter for a charity pick and building the rest of the team around a 9th place finish.

    An in form sprinter? You don't mean Arnaud Demare, surely? He's ridden 24 WT race days this season and his best result is a single second place.
    He beat Jordi Meeus in sprints in that second place and his win a week earlier - in the two races just before the TDF which sounds like decent form. Last GT he raced he won the points jersey and three stages. He's the best rider they have.
    According to the UCI rankings, he's the fifth best rider they have.
    And that tells you what you need to know about uci ranking points.
    That's a separate discussion. The point is that he's not justified a place in the Tour team this year based on his results. He can complain all he likes, but for a sprinter to go to the Tour, they have to be getting results.
  • mididoctors
    mididoctors Posts: 18,908
    edited July 2023
    Arkea way less visible than uno.x who I would give a D or even C repeatedly.got in the stage winning breaks even on big days johannessen was right in the action

    Wanty are better than arkea too... D
    "If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
  • mididoctors
    mididoctors Posts: 18,908
    DSM had a mare

    Ag2R were mixing it up with the big boys once they found the right guy . There team performance on the queen stage was superb
    "If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,164
    andyp said:

    andyp said:

    andyp said:

    If you're judging Cofidis in comparison how they've done in the past, you should do the same for Ineos.

    Groupama very lucky to get C having left behind an in form sprinter for a charity pick and building the rest of the team around a 9th place finish.

    An in form sprinter? You don't mean Arnaud Demare, surely? He's ridden 24 WT race days this season and his best result is a single second place.
    He beat Jordi Meeus in sprints in that second place and his win a week earlier - in the two races just before the TDF which sounds like decent form. Last GT he raced he won the points jersey and three stages. He's the best rider they have.
    According to the UCI rankings, he's the fifth best rider they have.
    And that tells you what you need to know about uci ranking points.
    That's a separate discussion. The point is that he's not justified a place in the Tour team this year based on his results. He can complain all he likes, but for a sprinter to go to the Tour, they have to be getting results.
    He was more likely to win a stage than Pinot.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,164
    The only time I noticed uno x was when their guy I'd picked on my velogames team caused a crash on the racing track.
  • No_Ta_Doctor
    No_Ta_Doctor Posts: 14,655

    Arkea way less visible than uno.x who I would give a D or even C repeatedly.got in the stage winning breaks even on big days johannessen was right in the action

    Wanty are better than arkea too... D

    Agree with this, Uno-X very harshly treated there - got a couple of top 3 stage places, animated breaks, were generally active and visible (no kit jokes please) all race. For a wildcard team in their first Tour they'll be pleased with their performance.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format
  • davidof said:

    Pidock is probably dissapointed following his breakout win in the mountains last year.

    Maybe a discussion in its own right but Pidcock / INEOS need to decide whether or not to go "all in" as a Grand Tour GC contender. He rallied well in the final week after struggling on the Loze, which suggests he might have the requisite recovery powers. But he'll have to ditch the MTB stuff to train properly for GTs (his MTB and 'cross training are obviously pretty good!) one would think, which might not suit him.

  • mididoctors
    mididoctors Posts: 18,908
    edited July 2023
    I think most of the teams rode pretty well on occasion. The maligned Fdj rode with a plan a plan a number of number of times . Didn't come off . Gaudu was shit .

    To get any sort of result stage or otherwise was largely a team effort on the day .. teams are more important than ever now .running counter to the narratives teams are unnecessary

    "If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
  • dannbodge
    dannbodge Posts: 1,152
    I completely forgot Movistar were even in the tour this year.
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,104
    I'd say there's a spot of grade inflation going on there.

    UAE I'd give a B - their main aim was to win the Tour and they failed.

    Ineos - C - big budget team with a largely invisible rider in 5th. Pidcock has pretty much confirmed himself as never going to be a GC rider. C is a pass - couple of stages is a pass but they won't be satisfied.

    Lotto & FDJ - maybe I'm being unfair - I don't know their budget - but I can't remember what they did in the race so I'd drop them both a grade.

    Movistar - aren't they a decent budget team? Again I can barely remember them other than the Mas disappointment - I'd be tempted to give them an F but again I may be wrong in thinking they have a good budget.

    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,463
    I'd move Uno X up a grade, they had most of their team in breaks in the final week and Johannessen had 3rd, 5th and 6th place stage finishes from being in long breaks with the 3rd place being behind the big two at Cauterets. In fact, I think I'd move them up two grades if Cofidis are an A based on not being as bad as expected. FDJ getting a C, presumably on the basis of Gaudu in 9th on GC is generous.
  • r0bh
    r0bh Posts: 2,438


    Ineos - C - big budget team with a largely invisible rider in 5th. Pidcock has pretty much confirmed himself as never going to be a GC rider. C is a pass - couple of stages is a pass but they won't be satisfied.

    I would dispute that Rodriguez was "largely invisible" - he won a mountain stage!

  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,463
    r0bh said:


    Ineos - C - big budget team with a largely invisible rider in 5th. Pidcock has pretty much confirmed himself as never going to be a GC rider. C is a pass - couple of stages is a pass but they won't be satisfied.

    I would dispute that Rodriguez was "largely invisible" - he won a mountain stage!

    Yeah, definitely harsh. He was quite often the last non-UAE or Jumbo rider left in the group and the best of the rest on a couple of mountain stages.
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,463
    dannbodge said:

    I completely forgot Movistar were even in the tour this year.

    Jorgensen had a couple of good stages and was really unlucky on Puy de Dome, blowing up in the final km and getting passed by the big 2 then Mohoric in the final metres.
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,553

    andyp said:

    andyp said:

    andyp said:

    If you're judging Cofidis in comparison how they've done in the past, you should do the same for Ineos.

    Groupama very lucky to get C having left behind an in form sprinter for a charity pick and building the rest of the team around a 9th place finish.

    An in form sprinter? You don't mean Arnaud Demare, surely? He's ridden 24 WT race days this season and his best result is a single second place.
    He beat Jordi Meeus in sprints in that second place and his win a week earlier - in the two races just before the TDF which sounds like decent form. Last GT he raced he won the points jersey and three stages. He's the best rider they have.
    According to the UCI rankings, he's the fifth best rider they have.
    And that tells you what you need to know about uci ranking points.
    That's a separate discussion. The point is that he's not justified a place in the Tour team this year based on his results. He can complain all he likes, but for a sprinter to go to the Tour, they have to be getting results.
    He was more likely to win a stage than Pinot.
    Pinot has three Tour stage wins to his name, Demare has two.
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,553
    Pross said:

    dannbodge said:

    I completely forgot Movistar were even in the tour this year.

    Jorgensen had a couple of good stages and was really unlucky on Puy de Dome, blowing up in the final km and getting passed by the big 2 then Mohoric in the final metres.
    Mike Woods and Pierre Latour?