The big Coronavirus thread
Comments
-
So a British or Irish citizen who has been living in Northern Italy and has just returned home could fly whilst a Polish person who hasn't left the UK for 10 years wouldn't be able to? If it hadn't come from the Trump administration I might think it was a knee jerk policy made on the hoof with no real thought process.pblakeney said:
U.S. border control begins in the country of departure. So anybody without a UK or Irish passport will be refused. Not that a virus respects passports, obviously.focuszing723 said:
Good point, Ireland too. They can't exactly reject them once they have landed in the US, will it be something we have to enforce through passport checks?Pross said:So with the US travel ban does that mean all people from mainland Europe needing to get to the US will just stage through the UK or are they not quite that dumb?
0 -
Fenix mate; it's all pretty bad but don't stress out too much about it.
Focus on what you can control and recognise if it is serious you don't want to start doing the extreme stuff before it's necessary because, when things are more critical, you're more likely to make a bad decision if you've been at red alert for ages.0 -
On a lighter note the reason why so much toilet roll has been sold is because every time someone coughs a thousand people shit themselves.1
-
Your post just makes you look more stupid because that is not what I saidkingstongraham said:
WE CAUGHT THAT ONE PATIENT EARLY AND THAT'S WHY WE DON'T HAVE ANY CASES IN THE UK NOW.coopster_the_1st said:
We are not 2 weeks behind Italy. It's rubbish to look at their numbers and then find the UK equivalent of positives and say that is how far behind we are. Both countries had patient zero at a similar time however Italy went weeks before catching up with contact tracing this patient. We knew all patient zero contacts (Brighton) very quickly.fenix said:
Doctor in Italy on breakfast TV today saying their health system is almost at breaking point. They're just a couple of weeks ahead.Pross said:
I still haven't seen / heard one expert on mainstream TV or radio say anything similar to some of the quotes in print or online media. They are still very much in the nothing to be overly concerned about unless you're elderly and / or have underlying health issues. Is this that TV / radio are toeing the official line or that the wider media are using hyperbole to get hits? I guess we'll find out within a month.
Countries who prepare well - death rate might be 1%. Countries with poor plans - 5%.
We need to flatten the infection curve. Do what the Italians have announced now.0 -
Unfortunately there is no lighter note for those fully infected by the media hysteria and that will do more damage than C19john80 said:On a lighter note the reason why so much toilet roll has been sold is because every time someone coughs a thousand people censored themselves.
0 -
I think I'll be writing a list of everything we'd need if my family were to be self isolated for 2 weeks.rick_chasey said:Focus on what you can control
I don't think there's any need to go mental - but it's starting to seem like a responsible precaution.“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
A work colleague had a Facebook chat with a friend in England whose dad was living in Italy. That friend showed my work colleague screenshots of a chat she had with her father in Italy. This convinced her of a few things such as experts are lying. This affects all sectors of society equally, it's not just elderly and those with underlying b conditions who are dying. Also she is convinced UK should be on immediate lockdown.fenix said:Sorry TM - not getting that.
Her colleagues dad is in Italy ? Is she believing him or not ?
Convoluted way of saying that she has got her information from Facebook not experts. The idea that social media is getting people into a state of worry, paranoia and more prone to believing anything whether there's any remote link to a truth.
Seriously, she's come in thinking extinction level event, a slight exaggeration on my part. But considering her 180 degree flip on this matter from its not as bad as they're making it out to they're not being honest and it's worse thing ever!
I think this misinformation and readiness of many in society to believe media scare stories and myths is dangerous. Until I spoke to my work colleague this morning I hadn't any clue how bad misinformation and social media transmission of myths really is.0 -
I heard the Italian lockdown wasn't effective for some time. Milan airport still ran when they were in lockdown one radio 4 report said. Easily believed with Italy I think.0
-
Hmmm. The hysteria meter needle keeps ticking round to the right.
Supposed to off to Valencia on a lads football trip end of month. Chances of that going ahead meter needle sinking to the left in a somewhat regular manner.0 -
Yeah, it's really the media that led to policy makers in various parts of China (who control the media themselves) and the whole of italy being put under quarantine.coopster_the_1st said:
Unfortunately there is no lighter note for those fully infected by the media hysteria and that will do more damage than C19john80 said:On a lighter note the reason why so much toilet roll has been sold is because every time someone coughs a thousand people censored themselves.
How are your crack supplies holding up in the crisis? Don't share the pipe would be my advice.0 -
I listened to an American guy getting interviewed at this link last night and it was very interesting. Basically their are large downsides to shutting down large elements of society that may do more harm than good. It remains to be seen whether the more individualistic nature of Europeans versus the more obedient far east style societies result in better outcomes. That is to say that we in the West generally don't follow authority and it will be interesting to see how effective the go home and suffer financial losses is in certain sectors that are not easily worked from home. 14 days is a long time if you have a big mortgage, not a lot of savings and £88 per week on sick pay.
0 -
You assumed that we should start the timeline for comparison with Italy from the moment we saw the first patient, who was probably relatively successfully contained, and that because the UK cases have not risen at the same rate from that point, there cannot be any correlation. Even though they have been rising at a similar rate if you rebase the start point by about two weeks.coopster_the_1st said:
Your post just makes you look more stupid because that is not what I saidkingstongraham said:
WE CAUGHT THAT ONE PATIENT EARLY AND THAT'S WHY WE DON'T HAVE ANY CASES IN THE UK NOW.coopster_the_1st said:
We are not 2 weeks behind Italy. It's rubbish to look at their numbers and then find the UK equivalent of positives and say that is how far behind we are. Both countries had patient zero at a similar time however Italy went weeks before catching up with contact tracing this patient. We knew all patient zero contacts (Brighton) very quickly.fenix said:
Doctor in Italy on breakfast TV today saying their health system is almost at breaking point. They're just a couple of weeks ahead.Pross said:
I still haven't seen / heard one expert on mainstream TV or radio say anything similar to some of the quotes in print or online media. They are still very much in the nothing to be overly concerned about unless you're elderly and / or have underlying health issues. Is this that TV / radio are toeing the official line or that the wider media are using hyperbole to get hits? I guess we'll find out within a month.
Countries who prepare well - death rate might be 1%. Countries with poor plans - 5%.
We need to flatten the infection curve. Do what the Italians have announced now.0 -
Both of those countries denied its existence at the start and lost control of the virus. The US has followed the same pattern so I expect the same outcome there.rick_chasey said:
Yeah, it's really the media that led to policy makers in various parts of China (who control the media themselves) and the whole of italy being put under quarantine.coopster_the_1st said:
Unfortunately there is no lighter note for those fully infected by the media hysteria and that will do more damage than C19john80 said:On a lighter note the reason why so much toilet roll has been sold is because every time someone coughs a thousand people censored themselves.
How are your crack supplies holding up in the crisis? Don't share the pipe would be my advice.
The UK has had not though except the media are stoking the anxiety. Comparing Italy to the UK is like comparing apples and pears regarding each country's actions regarding this virus0 -
Probably not, but it is the same as if you have been to Iran, Syria etc. in the last five years.Pross said:
Can they tell that for EU citizens though? Couldn't they still travel visa free to the UK and jump on a plane here? Likewise, Brits may have been to Europe, gone home and then fly to the States or is there some system that picks up travel history even if no visa has been required?TheBigBean said:
No. It's based on whether you have been to mainland Europe in the last two weeks. They could quarantine themselves in the UK which isn't good news for the UK.Pross said:So with the US travel ban does that mean all people from mainland Europe needing to get to the US will just stage through the UK or are they not quite that dumb?
0 -
The UK and Italian situations are different, that is easy to see. This is a positive for the UK.kingstongraham said:
You assumed that we should start the timeline for comparison with Italy from the moment we saw the first patient, who was probably relatively successfully contained, and that because the UK cases have not risen at the same rate from that point, there cannot be any correlation. Even though they have been rising at a similar rate if you rebase the start point by about two weeks.coopster_the_1st said:
Your post just makes you look more stupid because that is not what I saidkingstongraham said:
WE CAUGHT THAT ONE PATIENT EARLY AND THAT'S WHY WE DON'T HAVE ANY CASES IN THE UK NOW.coopster_the_1st said:
We are not 2 weeks behind Italy. It's rubbish to look at their numbers and then find the UK equivalent of positives and say that is how far behind we are. Both countries had patient zero at a similar time however Italy went weeks before catching up with contact tracing this patient. We knew all patient zero contacts (Brighton) very quickly.fenix said:
Doctor in Italy on breakfast TV today saying their health system is almost at breaking point. They're just a couple of weeks ahead.Pross said:
I still haven't seen / heard one expert on mainstream TV or radio say anything similar to some of the quotes in print or online media. They are still very much in the nothing to be overly concerned about unless you're elderly and / or have underlying health issues. Is this that TV / radio are toeing the official line or that the wider media are using hyperbole to get hits? I guess we'll find out within a month.
Countries who prepare well - death rate might be 1%. Countries with poor plans - 5%.
We need to flatten the infection curve. Do what the Italians have announced now.
We do not have a concentrations of cases like Italy has. This is because of our actions since patient zero was found.
However we are now, through public fear which is being magnified by the media, taking actions because of the fear that is spreading through the public. Making decisions based on fear will mean less optimal actions being taken and damage the country more.0 -
Irony meter done broke.coopster_the_1st said:However we are now, through public fear which is being magnified by the media, taking actions because of the fear that is spreading through the public. Making decisions based on fear will mean less optimal actions being taken and damage the country more.
1 -
Varadkar just announced general shut down for Ireland.
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
How are you doing?ddraver said:0 -
I was recalling the 2009 with 'swine flu' pandemic and wondering why, although a huge thing, it was nowhere near as disruptive.
'Swine flu' is the H1N1 influenza virus. It came to UK in April (from Mexico), but the first death was not until June. Huge infection rate in June/July then again in the autumn. Graphic shows infection rate per week - ie new cases.
Unusual because young were affected more than old (see below), and the summer dip was attributed to school summer holiday. 128 England deaths directly attributed up to 9th November 2009, from around 540,000 cases i.e. around 0.03% (different sources give different numbers, depending on region).
Because it was similar to previous influenza strains, most older people already had partial immunity (through previous infections or vaccines) so it was no-where near as dangerous to older people. It is still potentially around but is now just another 'ordinary' flu virus.
The two previous SARS outbreaks in 2002 and 2004 (which are a different coronavirus strain) did not get the same traction in human populations, only infected a few thousand worldwide and were contained. (edit: Although it had very high death rates in those infected) SARS did not have anything like the same transmission.
I've flipped from 'meh' to realising that Covid-19 is VERY different.
0 -
Unfortunately we are now going to see what goes wrong when our economy has too much debt built up in the system and there is no spare capacity for more debt. Without another debt bailout (ironically with more debt) it is going to be a house of cards.
This is where the bigger long term risk is with this C19
0 -
Your wish is my command, mrfpb...mrfpb said:The travel ban is from Shengen area, so Stevo needs to import his EU chart! It's an odd decisio given the established links between USA and far east. Trump has also backtracked already due to outcry about imports and trade.
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
True, but most other countries will be in the same cruise ship too.coopster_the_1st said:Unfortunately we are now going to see what goes wrong when our economy has too much debt built up in the system and there is no spare capacity for more debt. Without another debt bailout (ironically with more debt) it is going to be a house of cards.
This is where the bigger long term risk is with this C190 -
you know that will make the problem worse?focuszing723 said:
True, but most other countries will be in the same cruise ship too.coopster_the_1st said:Unfortunately we are now going to see what goes wrong when our economy has too much debt built up in the system and there is no spare capacity for more debt. Without another debt bailout (ironically with more debt) it is going to be a house of cards.
This is where the bigger long term risk is with this C190 -
It sounds like it's going to be herd mentality. I hope it works and we don't see ourselves akin to Italy in two weeks.surrey_commuter said:
you know that will make the problem worse?focuszing723 said:
True, but most other countries will be in the same cruise ship too.coopster_the_1st said:Unfortunately we are now going to see what goes wrong when our economy has too much debt built up in the system and there is no spare capacity for more debt. Without another debt bailout (ironically with more debt) it is going to be a house of cards.
This is where the bigger long term risk is with this C190 -
I'm guessing that most of the countries who are affected by the ban are electronic visa ESTA countries where you have to apply in advance and supply both your nationality and country of residence. Therefore when they do the pre-boarding check at your departure airport which is a real-time OK/not OK to board check I would imagine anyone who put their residency as one of the affected countries will be refused boarding. So for the above examples it would depend where both people put as their country of residence rather than just their nationality.Pross said:
So a British or Irish citizen who has been living in Northern Italy and has just returned home could fly whilst a Polish person who hasn't left the UK for 10 years wouldn't be able to? If it hadn't come from the Trump administration I might think it was a knee jerk policy made on the hoof with no real thought process.pblakeney said:
U.S. border control begins in the country of departure. So anybody without a UK or Irish passport will be refused. Not that a virus respects passports, obviously.focuszing723 said:
Good point, Ireland too. They can't exactly reject them once they have landed in the US, will it be something we have to enforce through passport checks?Pross said:So with the US travel ban does that mean all people from mainland Europe needing to get to the US will just stage through the UK or are they not quite that dumb?
'Hello to Jason Isaacs'0 -
Based on that chart I 'just' have the flu so, miserable but...mehfocuszing723 said:
How are you doing?
We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
That's good, yeah it's still not great.ddraver said:
Based on that chart I 'just' have the flu so, miserable but...mehfocuszing723 said:
How are you doing?0