The thread that was conveniently missed... Still waiting for a response from Rick
pinno
Posts: 52,463
Ridgerider wrote:We did think that our 'big idea' from last year's get together had succeeded beyond our expectations...to create a new user that any of us could all log on as if we wanted to have a little dig at someone or to put really stupid ideas out there to see if we could just get one person to agree with them. We didn't quite manage the last part, but it was fun trying. We were not sure whether we will be able to top it next year, but we agreed on a new user name for 2017, so watch this space.
viewtopic.php?f=40002&t=12944279&start=560#p20021061
seanoconn - gruagach craic!
0
Comments
-
Bungle
Milemuncher
Bottom briquettes
FocusZing
Imposter!0 -
See, this is Rick Chasey's brigade. Probably clever enough and has access to create a new user and back date the date of joining. Therefore, we can presume that date's are immaterial here.
It would make perfect sense that MM with his ridiculously low cadence is one of them. Perhaps there are multiple accounts in the same vein.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
They've got a whole database of backdated users with solid post counts already there.0
-
Very naughty...wonder who it could be?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0
-
No I'm just a fvck1ng idiot I'm afraid, who fights a lone battle against seriousness mixed with pretentiousness.0
-
Shirley Basso wrote:They've got a whole database of backdated users with solid post counts already there.
Well noted.
You're cleverer than you lookseanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
FocusZing wrote:No I'm just a fvck1ng idiot I'm afraid, who fights a lone battle against seriousness mixed with pretentiousness."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0
-
mf reckons its all of them. individually they aren't clever or witty enough to carry it off. even collectively they aren't very witty.
#notverywittyPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Maybe there's one each for all the different MFs?
In fact maybe we're all MFs? :shock:
#theplotsickensCurrent:
NukeProof Mega FR 2012
Cube NuRoad 2018
Previous:
2015 Genesis CdF 10, 2014 Cube Hyde Race, 2012 NS Traffic, 2007 Specialized SX Trail, 2005 Specialized Demo 80 -
CitizenLee wrote:Maybe there's one each for all the different MFs?
In fact maybe we're all MFs? :shock:
#theplotsickens
Far too deep. Sod off Camus.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
Pinno wrote:CitizenLee wrote:Maybe there's one each for all the different MFs?
In fact maybe we're all MFs? :shock:
#theplotsickens
Far too deep. Sod off Camus.
Current:
NukeProof Mega FR 2012
Cube NuRoad 2018
Previous:
2015 Genesis CdF 10, 2014 Cube Hyde Race, 2012 NS Traffic, 2007 Specialized SX Trail, 2005 Specialized Demo 80 -
Pinno wrote:Ridgerider wrote:We did think that our 'big idea' from last year's get together had succeeded beyond our expectations...to create a new user that any of us could all log on as if we wanted to have a little dig at someone or to put really stupid ideas out there to see if we could just get one person to agree with them. We didn't quite manage the last part, but it was fun trying. We were not sure whether we will be able to top it next year, but we agreed on a new user name for 2017, so watch this space.
viewtopic.php?f=40002&t=12944279&start=560#p20021061
And all this time there's me thinking the people listed as being at the gathering were just common or garden bellends. I have done them an injustice...0 -
I'm not Spartacus.0
-
-
Oddly enough, nobody has replied to Pinno in that Pro Race thread."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0
-
Pinno wrote:Ridgerider wrote:We did think that our 'big idea' from last year's get together had succeeded beyond our expectations...to create a new user that any of us could all log on as if we wanted to have a little dig at someone or to put really stupid ideas out there to see if we could just get one person to agree with them. We didn't quite manage the last part, but it was fun trying. We were not sure whether we will be able to top it next year, but we agreed on a new user name for 2017, so watch this space.
viewtopic.php?f=40002&t=12944279&start=560#p20021061
Most do a decent job of that in their own name.[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0 -
Why have you resurrected a post from two years ago?
I suspect it was a joke by Ridgerider as you may note that much of the post is slightly absurd.0 -
DeVlaeminck wrote:
Most do a decent job of that in their own name.
Roger, I respect your palmares, but I suspect that you might be an imposter.0 -
Pinno wrote:Ridgerider wrote:We did think that our 'big idea' from last year's get together had succeeded beyond our expectations...to create a new user that any of us could all log on as if we wanted to have a little dig at someone or to put really stupid ideas out there to see if we could just get one person to agree with them. We didn't quite manage the last part, but it was fun trying. We were not sure whether we will be able to top it next year, but we agreed on a new user name for 2017, so watch this space.
viewtopic.php?f=40002&t=12944279&start=560#p20021061
Looks like a load of laughs missed it too.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
TheBigBean wrote:Why have you resurrected a post from two years ago?
Well, I think the novelty for them would have worn off by now but it hasn't (if it is true). I think it's quite hypocritical of the PC brigade to do such a thing.
Certain suspects are so adamant in their view(s), that it is possible, it has put people off the forum or detracts from reasonable discussion.
Are they having a laugh at other people's expense?
Multiple accounts are forbidden - one protagonist is a mod. Does he endorse such action or at least by not condemning it, allows this activity to happen? Or worse, is actively involved?seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
The idea that a group would have a fake profile to "have a dig" at someone who might have offended them is pretty poor.[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0
-
DeVlaeminck wrote:The idea that a group would have a fake profile to "have a dig" at someone who might have offended them is pretty poor.
Also untrue, I suspect.0 -
Pinno wrote:TheBigBean wrote:Why have you resurrected a post from two years ago?
Well, I think the novelty for them would have worn off by now but it hasn't (if it is true). I think it's quite hypocritical of the PC brigade to do such a thing.
Certain suspects are so adamant in their view(s), that it is possible, it has put people off the forum or detracts from reasonable discussion.
Are they having a laugh at other people's expense?
Multiple accounts are forbidden - one protagonist is a mod. Does he endorse such action or at least by not condemning it, allows this activity to happen? Or worse, is actively involved?
If true then it's not good, but possibly you are reading too much into a report of a beer-fuelled nonsense discussion.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Who cares?0
-
Shirley Basso wrote:Who cares?
everyone should - its these guys who report everyone for everything so why should they be allowed to do it?Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
TheBigBean wrote:DeVlaeminck wrote:The idea that a group would have a fake profile to "have a dig" at someone who might have offended them is pretty poor.
Also untrue, I suspect.
Well you were there so you can tell us what the fake profile(s) is/are and we can judge for ourselves.[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0 -
Surely they invented our pal who needed to carry gallons of water on his tours of south east england on account of there being no shops or taps anywhere in the area ?0
-
DeVlaeminck wrote:TheBigBean wrote:DeVlaeminck wrote:The idea that a group would have a fake profile to "have a dig" at someone who might have offended them is pretty poor.
Also untrue, I suspect.
Well you were there so you can tell us what the fake profile(s) is/are and we can judge for ourselves.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Matthewfalle wrote:Shirley Basso wrote:Who cares?
everyone should - its these guys who report everyone for everything so why should they be allowed to do it?
But does it really matter? If you're not being rude then you can't be reported.
If someone is deliberately being antagonistic then be a grown up and ignore them?
It sounds like a bit of a childish game but hardly worth getting up in arms about l0 -
rjsterry wrote:DeVlaeminck wrote:TheBigBean wrote:DeVlaeminck wrote:The idea that a group would have a fake profile to "have a dig" at someone who might have offended them is pretty poor.
Also untrue, I suspect.
Well you were there so you can tell us what the fake profile(s) is/are and we can judge for ourselves.
Well as they were talking about it having been a success yes.
What do you believe, they imagined having done it?[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0