Poo tin... Put@in...
Comments
-
The only problem is that for all the tanks and armoured vehicles taken out, the Russians can still send missiles in to civilian targets.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0
-
Not sure there is a '6th tank regiment', although there is a 6th tank brigade.briantrumpet said:
But a "tank regiment"? S'pose I'm hoping for a bit of a turning point...
Significant if true. Suggests over 90 tanks, plus associated support. I'd be surprised to see an entire regiment/brigade concentrated in a single location. On the other hand, given how random the Russians' strategic planning seems to be, maybe I wouldn't...
0 -
imposter2.0 said:
Not sure there is a '6th tank regiment', although there is a 6th tank brigade.briantrumpet said:
But a "tank regiment"? S'pose I'm hoping for a bit of a turning point...
Significant if true. Suggests over 90 tanks, plus associated support. I'd be surprised to see an entire regiment/brigade concentrated in a single location. On the other hand, given how random the Russians' strategic planning seems to be, maybe I wouldn't...
As you say...
0 -
Has this been explained earlier? If so my apologies for not having found it.
I am trying to understand the significance and modus operandi of Putin's immensely long negotiating table, the one where he sits at one end and about 50 metres away at the other, his miserable lickspittles huddle fearfully. Is it simply a phallic symbol demonstrating his vast power and invincibility? Or is it that he is beyond an accurate pistol shot or radius of a bomb blast?
How would it have worked when Macron was occupying the other end? Who would have been at the wrong end of the penis? And how do they communicate at such a distance? Is it via Zoom?
Does Putin not realise how ridiculous it makes him look? Like David Brent in the office although infinitely more grotesquely evil.0 -
Putin must be thinking "We're reallyfucked if the west gets drawn in fully."
Downside is making him consider his last resort.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
This is an interesting thread re the 'narrative' that the press uses, about places such as Mariopul. His thesis is that basically the Russians' focus on trying to take places like that are an indicator of its failure in strategic terms, and the media's focus on such places does not help get the big picture.
0 -
Christ, who'd be a tank driver?briantrumpet said:imposter2.0 said:
Not sure there is a '6th tank regiment', although there is a 6th tank brigade.briantrumpet said:
But a "tank regiment"? S'pose I'm hoping for a bit of a turning point...
Significant if true. Suggests over 90 tanks, plus associated support. I'd be surprised to see an entire regiment/brigade concentrated in a single location. On the other hand, given how random the Russians' strategic planning seems to be, maybe I wouldn't...
As you say...
seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
Good call. He has a few interesting tweets about this sort of stuff in general too...briantrumpet said:We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
Another interesting read from Kamil Galeev.
1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
rjsterry said:
Another interesting read from Kamil Galeev.
**dons Rick Chasey hobby horses hat on**
A generational political divide you say?
🧐0 -
Jeepers. Even taking into account the thread earlier, I think there might be some reportage of Kyiv that will be harrowing. Looks like the Russians are going for annihilation by any means.
0 -
briantrumpet said:
Jeepers. Even taking into account the thread earlier, I think there might be some reportage of Kyiv that will be harrowing. Looks like the Russians are going for annihilation by any means.
More detail:
Are they just flailing around?0 -
Putin must really hate Sunday trading.0
-
Bloke on Today just now explaining that Russian soldiers aren't allowed to carry mobile phones, so you aren't seeing their "successes" on twitter etc. in the same way as you are for Ukraine's.0
-
If the destruction of civilian buildings was a success metric for wars then Putin would be world champ. Not sure what other success they are having as they are not winning hearts and minds.First.Aspect said:Bloke on Today just now explaining that Russian soldiers aren't allowed to carry mobile phones, so you aren't seeing their "successes" on twitter etc. in the same way as you are for Ukraine's.
0 -
They haven’t been allowed smart phones since 2019. The Russians are scared of leaked information on the web / social media.
I think successes is wishful thinking.
0 -
I think the use of "successes" suggest FA realises that0
-
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Not really my point. More that there is a lot of Ra ra ra about twitter posts showing photos taken on the ground of damaged or appropriated Russian kit, but this is a one sided assessment.Pross said:I think the use of "successes" suggest FA realises that
0 -
This C-32B Gatekeeper doesn’t make too many appearances. It’ll be interesting to see where it ends up. These guys are your proper mystery men.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/486th_Flight_Test_Squadron0 -
The Mole Valley resistance movement has mobilised...
0 -
Lachlan Morton's ride (42h/1064km) now raised $220,000 and counting.
He could have bought a breakfast meeting with Spaffer for that. Oh wait, no he's Australian not Russian...1 -
Probably could have bought breakfast AND a jolly game of croquet wat wat.orraloon said:Lachlan Morton's ride (42h/1064km) now raised $220,000 and counting.
He could have bought a breakfast meeting with Spaffer for that. Oh wait, no he's Australian not Russian...Felt F70 05 (Turbo)
Marin Palisades Trail 91 and 06
Scott CR1 SL 12
Cannondale Synapse Adventure 15 & 16 Di2
Scott Foil 180 -
So across the distillates the most acute oil based shortages will be in diesel and jet fuel it seems, as the Russian oil disproportionately spits out those distillates versus other oil around the world (crude is not as fungible as people think.)
Grain, mainly wheat is obviously shot to pieces and ME and NA in particular do not have infrastructure set up to take on wheat elsewhere.
I do think there is still room for wage growth before we hit wage led inflation. I think if the gov't is smart they should really tweak the biases around what gets taxed to soften the blow.
I do think it's odd the govt is so quick to freeze or cut petrol/diesel taxes but not public transport costs - you'd think that's a winner for multiple reasons.0 -
I'd look at who's got shares in what.rick_chasey said:
I do think it's odd the govt is so quick to freeze or cut petrol/diesel taxes but not public transport costs - you'd think that's a winner for multiple reasons.
But we digress from the thread.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
War wise it seems there are 3 fronts and they've reached stalemate on 2 fronts, namely Kiev and in the East, and the Russians are making slow but progress in the South still, though that latter bit is mitigated as they're quite stretched out in that area.0
-
Who commutes on public transport?rick_chasey said:So across the distillates the most acute oil based shortages will be in diesel and jet fuel it seems, as the Russian oil disproportionately spits out those distillates versus other oil around the world (crude is not as fungible as people think.)
Grain, mainly wheat is obviously shot to pieces and ME and NA in particular do not have infrastructure set up to take on wheat elsewhere.
I do think there is still room for wage growth before we hit wage led inflation. I think if the gov't is smart they should really tweak the biases around what gets taxed to soften the blow.
I do think it's odd the govt is so quick to freeze or cut petrol/diesel taxes but not public transport costs - you'd think that's a winner for multiple reasons.
Metropolitan elites that's who.0 -
Only coz the Tories keep binning off investment in public infrastructure in the regions.Jezyboy said:
Who commutes on public transport?rick_chasey said:So across the distillates the most acute oil based shortages will be in diesel and jet fuel it seems, as the Russian oil disproportionately spits out those distillates versus other oil around the world (crude is not as fungible as people think.)
Grain, mainly wheat is obviously shot to pieces and ME and NA in particular do not have infrastructure set up to take on wheat elsewhere.
I do think there is still room for wage growth before we hit wage led inflation. I think if the gov't is smart they should really tweak the biases around what gets taxed to soften the blow.
I do think it's odd the govt is so quick to freeze or cut petrol/diesel taxes but not public transport costs - you'd think that's a winner for multiple reasons.
Metropolitan elites that's who.
It’s called levelling up I think.
New Elizabeth line in London looks great by the way. Top quality infrastructure0 -
I see you've already worked fungible into your day to day vocabulary...1
-
the person who wrote the article Rick copy and pasted from used it quite well i thought.First.Aspect said:I see you've already worked fungible into your day to day vocabulary...
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
1