Donald Trump

1358359361363364551

Comments

  • Jeremy.89
    Jeremy.89 Posts: 457

    pblakeney said:



    "Is that your bible?"
    "It's A bible."

    He's just a sick joke.
    We should all stop holding the US to high standards. Treat em like you would China.

    Makes sense since the US now has a dicktator.
    He was always fascist as a president. I've been saying this for four years.

    I know we all hold US to a higher standard, but I do struggle to be shocked by what I'm seeing. What were people expecting?

    We all know large swathes of America has been like this for a long time.

    The challenge is that this works for him, electorally.
    Otoh, the individual states are shielded from his stupidity in a way that the English are not shielded from BoJos buffoonery.

  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152
    He's consistent - this is him 30 years ago:

    "When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it. Then they were vicious, they were horrible, but they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak...as being spit on by the rest of the world."
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,328

    pblakeney said:



    "Is that your bible?"
    "It's A bible."

    He's just a sick joke.
    We should all stop holding the US to high standards. Treat em like you would China.

    Makes sense since the US now has a dicktator.
    He was always fascist as a president. I've been saying this for four years.

    I know we all hold US to a higher standard, but I do struggle to be shocked by what I'm seeing. What were people expecting?

    We all know large swathes of America has been like this for a long time.

    The challenge is that this works for him, electorally.
    Yeah, I get that but he is not even pretending to hide it any more. I wonder if he is going too far with martial law and enough will be enough.

    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,318
    pblakeney said:


    Makes sense since the US now has a dicktator.

    I saw what you did there.
    There's Putin (about to be sworn in for life), Trump and Jinping.


    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:



    "Is that your bible?"
    "It's A bible."

    He's just a sick joke.
    We should all stop holding the US to high standards. Treat em like you would China.

    Makes sense since the US now has a dicktator.
    He was always fascist as a president. I've been saying this for four years.

    I know we all hold US to a higher standard, but I do struggle to be shocked by what I'm seeing. What were people expecting?

    We all know large swathes of America has been like this for a long time.

    The challenge is that this works for him, electorally.
    Yeah, I get that but he is not even pretending to hide it any more. I wonder if he is going too far with martial law and enough will be enough.

    Meh. Yanks love men with guns. Unless they're black. It's still early days but it doesn't look like to have budged his ratings all that much.

    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/?cid=rrpromo

    They're amazingly consistent.
  • step83
    step83 Posts: 4,170

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    Likely have a tantrum and refuse to leave claiming its a witch hunt
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:



    "Is that your bible?"
    "It's A bible."

    He's just a sick joke.
    We should all stop holding the US to high standards. Treat em like you would China.

    Makes sense since the US now has a dicktator.
    He was always fascist as a president. I've been saying this for four years.

    I know we all hold US to a higher standard, but I do struggle to be shocked by what I'm seeing. What were people expecting?

    We all know large swathes of America has been like this for a long time.

    The challenge is that this works for him, electorally.
    Yeah, I get that but he is not even pretending to hide it any more. I wonder if he is going too far with martial law and enough will be enough.

    Meh. Yanks love men with guns. Unless they're black. It's still early days but it doesn't look like to have budged his ratings all that much.

    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/?cid=rrpromo

    They're amazingly consistent.

  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,463

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
  • step83
    step83 Posts: 4,170
    Been watching and reading what Biden has been doing, he is quietly going round open meetings etc being the opposite of Trump.

    Annoyingly the photo op was clearly a move to panda to his main support base of evangelical supporters where he still holds great sway. He did this before pushing for churches to open.
    Just need to wait for round two of Covid to his in the US see how he spins it, likely blaming Mexicans and far right extremists again playing to his fans.

    Also the bible photo op, one its in front of a boarded up church (nice). But is that bible either back to front or upside down?

  • cruff
    cruff Posts: 1,518
    step83 said:

    Been watching and reading what Biden has been doing, he is quietly going round open meetings etc being the opposite of Trump.

    Annoyingly the photo op was clearly a move to panda to his main support base of evangelical supporters where he still holds great sway. He did this before pushing for churches to open.
    Just need to wait for round two of Covid to his in the US see how he spins it, likely blaming Mexicans and far right extremists again playing to his fans.

    Also the bible photo op, one its in front of a boarded up church (nice). But is that bible either back to front or upside down?

    I'm surprised it didn't burst into flames when he touched it
    Fat chopper. Some racing. Some testing. Some crashing.
    Specialising in Git Daaahns and Cafs. Norvern Munkey/Transplanted Laaandoner.
  • schlepcycling
    schlepcycling Posts: 1,614
    edited June 2020
    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also Trump can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House. He can postpone the election for various reasons but would eventually run in the 20th January problem.
    'Hello to Jason Isaacs'
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    I guess the bigger worry is that after this he wins...
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152

    I guess the bigger worry is that after this he wins...

    That's now.
  • schlepcycling
    schlepcycling Posts: 1,614

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
    I think that's called a coup
    'Hello to Jason Isaacs'
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
    I think that's called a coup
    Best get the independent justice department and the US Attorney General onto it. Oops.
  • nickice
    nickice Posts: 2,439

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
    Courts are there to enforce the law so there is no interest (legal or otherwise) in allowing him to stay on. There is a very good reason for judicial tenure.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,328

    .

    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,167

    I guess the bigger worry is that after this he wins...

    That's now.
    It would be somewhat less bad after a couple of years. The Republican cost/benefit analysis of circling that wagons then shift to the next electoral cycle. He'll be more and more of a lame duck signing executive orders to ban jeans and things like that.
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,553
    edited June 2020
    ...
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,349
    nickice said:

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
    Courts are there to enforce the law so there is no interest (legal or otherwise) in allowing him to stay on. There is a very good reason for judicial tenure.

    It might turn out to be a weakness of the US Constitution that judges are political appointees. Trump & McConnell have been packing them in as quickly as they can. There's a lot to be said for an awkward, independent judiciary.
  • nickice
    nickice Posts: 2,439

    nickice said:

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
    Courts are there to enforce the law so there is no interest (legal or otherwise) in allowing him to stay on. There is a very good reason for judicial tenure.

    It might turn out to be a weakness of the US Constitution that judges are political appointees. Trump & McConnell have been packing them in as quickly as they can. There's a lot to be said for an awkward, independent judiciary.
    Judges have been appointed as and when vacancies come up really (though there were some political games during the Obama administration). There are only two Trump appointees on the SC and neither of them would ever support what would amount to a coup. Even if they did, there would be no law to base it on.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,152
    nickice said:

    nickice said:

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
    Courts are there to enforce the law so there is no interest (legal or otherwise) in allowing him to stay on. There is a very good reason for judicial tenure.

    It might turn out to be a weakness of the US Constitution that judges are political appointees. Trump & McConnell have been packing them in as quickly as they can. There's a lot to be said for an awkward, independent judiciary.
    Judges have been appointed as and when vacancies come up really (though there were some political games during the Obama administration). There are only two Trump appointees on the SC and neither of them would ever support what would amount to a coup. Even if they did, there would be no law to base it on.
    That's a joke, right?
  • darkhairedlord
    darkhairedlord Posts: 7,180
    step83 said:


    the photo op was clearly a move to panda to his main support base...

    the right to bear arms?
  • nickice
    nickice Posts: 2,439

    nickice said:

    nickice said:

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
    Courts are there to enforce the law so there is no interest (legal or otherwise) in allowing him to stay on. There is a very good reason for judicial tenure.

    It might turn out to be a weakness of the US Constitution that judges are political appointees. Trump & McConnell have been packing them in as quickly as they can. There's a lot to be said for an awkward, independent judiciary.
    Judges have been appointed as and when vacancies come up really (though there were some political games during the Obama administration). There are only two Trump appointees on the SC and neither of them would ever support what would amount to a coup. Even if they did, there would be no law to base it on.
    That's a joke, right?
    No.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,328
    edited June 2020
    Can anyone imagine the Trumpster responding like Trudeau?
    Not just the pause to consider the response, but the honesty.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-52900486/george-floyd-protests-trudeau-s-epic-pause-when-asked-about-trump-s-response
    BJ too, come to that.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,328
    nickice said:

    nickice said:

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
    Courts are there to enforce the law so there is no interest (legal or otherwise) in allowing him to stay on. There is a very good reason for judicial tenure.

    It might turn out to be a weakness of the US Constitution that judges are political appointees. Trump & McConnell have been packing them in as quickly as they can. There's a lot to be said for an awkward, independent judiciary.
    Judges have been appointed as and when vacancies come up really (though there were some political games during the Obama administration). There are only two Trump appointees on the SC and neither of them would ever support what would amount to a coup. Even if they did, there would be no law to base it on.
    It might only be 2 but that is 2 out of only 9. And counting...
    Not bad going when one was appointed by G.Bush senior.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • nickice
    nickice Posts: 2,439
    pblakeney said:

    nickice said:

    nickice said:

    Pross said:

    You do wonder what will happen in the event he loses an election.

    I can see him challenging the validity of the election, refusing to leave office until it's been reviewed and stirring up the lunatics who support him as he'll claim he's being punished for fighting for their rights.
    The great thing about the US Constitution is that the 20th Amendment states that the President and Vice President's terms both expire ends at noon on 20th January. Also he can't cancel the election without an act of Congress as a trio of Federal election laws set Election Day for presidential electors, senators, and US representatives as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” If Republicans want to change this law, they will need to go through the Democratic House.
    That's all very well, but this president has done a lot of things he isn't allowed to. If the senate, the courts, the military, and law enforcement decide that they're on his side when he declares an emergency and stays there, what happens then?
    Courts are there to enforce the law so there is no interest (legal or otherwise) in allowing him to stay on. There is a very good reason for judicial tenure.

    It might turn out to be a weakness of the US Constitution that judges are political appointees. Trump & McConnell have been packing them in as quickly as they can. There's a lot to be said for an awkward, independent judiciary.
    Judges have been appointed as and when vacancies come up really (though there were some political games during the Obama administration). There are only two Trump appointees on the SC and neither of them would ever support what would amount to a coup. Even if they did, there would be no law to base it on.
    It might only be 2 but that is 2 out of only 9. And counting...
    Not bad going when one was appointed by G.Bush senior.
    It depends if another judge retires or dies. There is no great conspiracy here. Presidents have to right to nominate federal judges. The American system is actually pretty well set up with checks and balances to prevent it turning into a dictatorship. For example, term limits.