Join the Labour Party and save your country!
Comments
-
Giraffoto wrote:I'm frankly amazed at the voting restriction that's been added - if I'd just heard that "a political party" was only letting people vote on the leader if they stumped up £25, Labour wouldn't have been my first guess.
Kind of like the Tories, but with a red rosette.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Giraffoto wrote:I'm frankly amazed at the voting restriction that's been added - if I'd just heard that "a political party" was only letting people vote on the leader if they stumped up £25, Labour wouldn't have been my first guess.
Not that surprising given the number of people who've reportedly stumped up £3 just to get Corbyn in and deliberately damage Labour's chances.0 -
Lol
0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:Now that Corbyn is on the ballot paper he is highly likely to win. If so, a split is on the cards unless the PLP is prepared to resign themselves to electoral oblivion at the next GE.
A merger like the one suggested above may soon be a very real choice.
I just don't see electoral oblivion. Most are in constituencies where a wheelie bin with a red rosette would get elected.0 -
bobmcstuff wrote:Giraffoto wrote:I'm frankly amazed at the voting restriction that's been added - if I'd just heard that "a political party" was only letting people vote on the leader if they stumped up £25, Labour wouldn't have been my first guess.
Not that surprising given the number of people who've reportedly stumped up £3 just to get Corbyn in and deliberately damage Labour's chances."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Cameron's comparison at PMQ of Corbyn with The Black Knight from the Holy Grail was quite amusing. Carry on - 'tis but a flesh wound..."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0
-
Stevo 666 wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:Giraffoto wrote:I'm frankly amazed at the voting restriction that's been added - if I'd just heard that "a political party" was only letting people vote on the leader if they stumped up £25, Labour wouldn't have been my first guess.
Not that surprising given the number of people who've reportedly stumped up £3 just to get Corbyn in and deliberately damage Labour's chances.
oh that really is asking for a rather rude reply isnt it? thankfully i dont know anyone who would stoop so low
do you meet the criteria?0 -
mamba80 wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:Giraffoto wrote:I'm frankly amazed at the voting restriction that's been added - if I'd just heard that "a political party" was only letting people vote on the leader if they stumped up £25, Labour wouldn't have been my first guess.
Not that surprising given the number of people who've reportedly stumped up £3 just to get Corbyn in and deliberately damage Labour's chances.
oh that really is asking for a rather rude reply isnt it? thankfully i dont know anyone who would stoop so low
do you meet the criteria?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
You know what i think, your not a Labour party supporter....... or are you more of a Putin type? vehemently anti labour whilst harbouring secret socialist desires?0
-
mamba80 wrote:You know what i think, your not a Labour party supporter....... or are you more of a Putin type? vehemently anti labour whilst harbouring secret socialist desires?
Labour appear to be on the edge of a precipice so if I can give them a little push I will going us all a favour
Which one of the three would you vote for?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:Labour appear to be on the edge of a precipice so if I can give them a little push I will going us all a favour0
-
briantrumpet wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Labour appear to be on the edge of a precipice so if I can give them a little push I will going us all a favour
Happy with a decent opposition, just don't want them anywhere near being in power. As implied by the thread title"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:mamba80 wrote:You know what i think, your not a Labour party supporter....... or are you more of a Putin type? vehemently anti labour whilst harbouring secret socialist desires?
Labour appear to be on the edge of a precipice so if I can give them a little push I will going us all a favour
Which one of the three would you vote for?
Angela Eagle, i ve seen her at PMQ's gave DC as good as he got, something Corbyn couldnt do.
tbh more concerned about who is in power, Liam Fox... basically a criminal who fraudulently claimed £3k and allowed a man 17 years his junior to attend security briefings, forced to resign as defence sec after admitting "errors of judgment" any of us would now have a criminal record, he is now back in the cabinet ffs and BJ .... a clown for f/sec
Got to question Mays judgement tbh, though perhaps this was the price for the MPs support?0 -
Some chap who has donated £400k to the Labour party is threatening legal action over the decision to allow Corbyn to stand. He might have done better to donate the funds to start a new party. Still, I never really understand how anyone can like a political party that much that they would donate £400k.0
-
Stevo 666 wrote:briantrumpet wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Labour appear to be on the edge of a precipice so if I can give them a little push I will going us all a favour
Happy with a decent opposition, just don't want them anywhere near being in power. As implied by the thread title0 -
I can't see any way out of the current impasse anyway - it really is two parties, who completely distrust and disrespect each other. I think the only game to play for now is which part keeps the name 'Labour', and any assets it has. I'd guess it'll be the Momentum/Corbyn side, as they have 'membership' support, but they will then end up with a tiny parliamentary presence after the next election, as most of the current lot of MPs can't carry on with it. The PLP is talking to the LibDems, in the tea rooms, I imagine - they probably have a lot more in common than with Labourentum.0
-
briantrumpet wrote:I can't see any way out of the current impasse anyway - it really is two parties, who completely distrust and disrespect each other. I think the only game to play for now is which part keeps the name 'Labour', and any assets it has. I'd guess it'll be the Momentum/Corbyn side, as they have 'membership' support, but they will then end up with a tiny parliamentary presence after the next election, as most of the current lot of MPs can't carry on with it. The PLP is talking to the LibDems, in the tea rooms, I imagine - they probably have a lot more in common than with Labourentum.
If the Corbyn faction were being honest they would let the mainstream part of the PLP have the Labour name and rebrand themselves more accurately as the Socialist Workers Party. They could then drift off into the electoral obscurity they so richly deserve, safe in the knowledge that they are ideologically pure."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
The Eagle has landed.My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
Facebook? No. Just say no.0 -
bendertherobot wrote:The Eagle has crash landed.
So the contest is now between Corbyn and some bloke we've never heard of until last week. What a choice."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:bendertherobot wrote:The Eagle has crash landed.
So the contest is now between a bloke we'd never heard of until a week before he was elected leader and some bloke we'd never heard of until last week. What a choice.
FTFY0 -
Garry H wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:bendertherobot wrote:The Eagle has crash landed.
So the contest is now between a bloke we'd never heard of until a week before he was elected leader and some bloke we'd never heard of until last week. What a choice.
FTFY
Most people would have heard of Corbyn - in the same way they will have heard of Dennis Skinner or George Galloway - ie all negative.0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Garry H wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:bendertherobot wrote:The Eagle has crash landed.
So the contest is now between a bloke we'd never heard of until a week before he was elected leader and some bloke we'd never heard of until last week. What a choice.
FTFY
Most people would have heard of Corbyn - in the same way they will have heard of Dennis Skinner or George Galloway - ie all negative.
Wouldn't have said he was well known as the other two you mention, not by a long shot.0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Garry H wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:bendertherobot wrote:The Eagle has crash landed.
So the contest is now between a bloke we'd never heard of until a week before he was elected leader and some bloke we'd never heard of until last week. What a choice.
FTFY
Most people would have heard of Corbyn - in the same way they will have heard of Dennis Skinner or George Galloway - ie all negative."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Garry H wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:Garry H wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:bendertherobot wrote:The Eagle has crash landed.
So the contest is now between a bloke we'd never heard of until a week before he was elected leader and some bloke we'd never heard of until last week. What a choice.
FTFY
Most people would have heard of Corbyn - in the same way they will have heard of Dennis Skinner or George Galloway - ie all negative.
Wouldn't have said he was well known as the other two you mention, not by a long shot.
I grew up in a Guardian reading household so maybe I have just learnt that I have an unusual level of knowledge about oddball lefties in the 1980s0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Garry H wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:Garry H wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:bendertherobot wrote:The Eagle has crash landed.
So the contest is now between a bloke we'd never heard of until a week before he was elected leader and some bloke we'd never heard of until last week. What a choice.
FTFY
Most people would have heard of Corbyn - in the same way they will have heard of Dennis Skinner or George Galloway - ie all negative.
Wouldn't have said he was well known as the other two you mention, not by a long shot.
I grew up in a Guardian reading household so maybe I have just learnt that I have an unusual level of knowledge about oddball lefties in the 1980s
He didn't even have a Spitting Image puppet0 -
Garry H wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:Garry H wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:Garry H wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:bendertherobot wrote:The Eagle has crash landed.
So the contest is now between a bloke we'd never heard of until a week before he was elected leader and some bloke we'd never heard of until last week. What a choice.
FTFY
Most people would have heard of Corbyn - in the same way they will have heard of Dennis Skinner or George Galloway - ie all negative.
Wouldn't have said he was well known as the other two you mention, not by a long shot.
I grew up in a Guardian reading household so maybe I have just learnt that I have an unusual level of knowledge about oddball lefties in the 1980s
He didn't even have a Spitting Image puppet
Maybe because he is impossible to parody0 -
Anyone see PMQs today? May's comparison of Corbyn with an unscrupulous boss was good. Doesn't listen to his workers, makes them do more than one job for the same pay and exploits the rules to further his own career"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0
-
Stevo 666 wrote:Anyone see PMQs today? May's comparison of Corbyn with an unscrupulous boss was good. Doesn't listen to his workers, makes them do more than one job for the same pay and exploits the rules to further his own career
Even the Guardianistas acknowlwdge that she got off to a flyer.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ions-panel0 -
Ballysmate wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:Anyone see PMQs today? May's comparison of Corbyn with an unscrupulous boss was good. Doesn't listen to his workers, makes them do more than one job for the same pay and exploits the rules to further his own career
Even the Guardianistas acknowlwdge that she got off to a flyer.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ions-panel"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
JC banging on about the miners strike 30 odd years ago. Who says he isn't stuck in a time warp?
Vote Corbyn for leader.0