The Cycling Podcast

1235715

Comments

  • bobmcstuff
    bobmcstuff Posts: 11,435
    Same, they're making my morning drive much more bearable!
  • joelsim
    joelsim Posts: 7,552
    It's good, even with the stereotypical Italian.
  • mechanism
    mechanism Posts: 891
    edited May 2016
    I'm not going to pick favourites, but I like the podcast so much I bought a Lionel Dove Siamo t-shirt without knowing when I would wear it. Orla Chennaoui and Ned Boulting are good when then make an appearance.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Has everyone come over shy because one of them posted on here once? ;)

    The particular giro dynamic between Friebe and Lionel was entertaining. Lionel being the newbie to the Giro, Friebe getting a bit overexcited. Not sure that would necessarily work outside of Italy but was good.

    Ultimately this podcast wins over others because of the behind the scenes goss and the interviews /access they get.

    For me the "discussions" are the weakest part, particularly when they have as much info as we do.

    I do find the Ciro stuff tiresome; his English just isn't good enough and he won't divulge enough to warrant the effort.

    The cultural stuff they do is very welcome. It was always part of the Dutch coverage I watched as a kid and for me that's part of the value of GTs. The "what is this part of the world like?" Take on it.

    Friebe is obviously the best because ultimately he tells us the stuff we don't know. And I bloody love a goss.
  • bobmcstuff
    bobmcstuff Posts: 11,435
    Yes the cultural bits/km0 really make it for me.

    Makes you feel much more immersed in the race.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    Has everyone come over shy because one of them posted on here once? ;)

    well no, I just don't feel the need to pick holes in everything...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    I quite enjoy when you get some solo Lionel action (KM0, or his Tale of the Tappa) where he sounds like a Quiet Storm DJ at 2:30 in the morning.
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • takethehighroad
    takethehighroad Posts: 6,822
    I've got to say I enjoy Ciro, Rick, for the pure slapstick nature of it. The scene of him meeting Pippo at the bus when he nearly won the other day was priceless.

    The 'argument' they had last night about the tactics for today's stage is what I enjoy most, and I particularly enjoyed the 'discussion' between Lionel and Richard about Valverde losing 9 seconds in a split.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Pfft can come on here for that.


    Well I used to anyway...
  • curium
    curium Posts: 815
    Has everyone come over shy because one of them posted on here once? ;)

    The particular giro dynamic between Friebe and Lionel was entertaining. Lionel being the newbie to the Giro, Friebe getting a bit overexcited. Not sure that would necessarily work outside of Italy but was good.

    Ultimately this podcast wins over others because of the behind the scenes goss and the interviews /access they get.

    For me the "discussions" are the weakest part, particularly when they have as much info as we do.

    I do find the Ciro stuff tiresome; his English just isn't good enough and he won't divulge enough to warrant the effort.

    The cultural stuff they do is very welcome. It was always part of the Dutch coverage I watched as a kid and for me that's part of the value of GTs. The "what is this part of the world like?" Take on it.

    Friebe is obviously the best because ultimately he tells us the stuff we don't know. And I bloody love a goss.
    I love Ciro. He's very entertaining and his English is better than my Italian.

    I want one of those No Ciro, No Giro! T-shirts.

    https://twitter.com/friebos/status/736882650540081153
  • joelsim
    joelsim Posts: 7,552
    curium wrote:
    Has everyone come over shy because one of them posted on here once? ;)

    The particular giro dynamic between Friebe and Lionel was entertaining. Lionel being the newbie to the Giro, Friebe getting a bit overexcited. Not sure that would necessarily work outside of Italy but was good.

    Ultimately this podcast wins over others because of the behind the scenes goss and the interviews /access they get.

    For me the "discussions" are the weakest part, particularly when they have as much info as we do.

    I do find the Ciro stuff tiresome; his English just isn't good enough and he won't divulge enough to warrant the effort.

    The cultural stuff they do is very welcome. It was always part of the Dutch coverage I watched as a kid and for me that's part of the value of GTs. The "what is this part of the world like?" Take on it.

    Friebe is obviously the best because ultimately he tells us the stuff we don't know. And I bloody love a goss.

    I love Ciro. He's very entertaining and his English is better than my Italian.

    I want one of those

    https://twitter.com/friebos/status/736882650540081153

    I'd like one of those No Ciro, No Ciro! T-shirts.

    He's a buffoon.
  • bobmcstuff
    bobmcstuff Posts: 11,435
    The Boris Johnson of pro cycling.

    Or is that Vino?
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    FOREIGN MAN IS
    FOREIGN SHOCK!
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,232
    ddraver wrote:
    FOREIGN MAN IS
    FOREIGN SHOCK!

    Yeah, thought Rick had gone a bit non PC with "his English just isn't good enough".

    Has he contracted an -ism' or something? Must be too much contact with BB-ers. :?
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Ah don't troll.

    If you're on a podcast, being able to speak the language is kinda a prerequisite.

    Bit like a writer being able to write.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,698
    To be fair, I wasnt thinking of Rick. I don't really know what he means but...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,232
    Ah don't troll.

    If you're on a podcast, being able to speak the language is kinda a prerequisite.

    Bit like a writer being able to write.

    Troll? Me? How very dare you!

    Personally don't have any issue with dem furrin accents on da podcast innat. Add some local colour.

    There was a similar complaint wee while back on another thread, the commentator one?, whingeing about Sean Kelly's accent. Again no prob for me, perfectly understandable
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    It's not the accent.

    I've seen the guy live for a few hours. He struggles with english, often doesn't know the words, and it's increasingly just a window shop for gone-on-for-too-long jokes and his column which he refuses to give any preview to.

    I don't doubt the guy's a good journalist. From the few articles I've struggled through with very weak Italian he gets some serious scoops, does decent work, and is generally very interesting.

    Unfortunately none of that translates to the podcast.
  • Sun Dodger
    Sun Dodger Posts: 393
    It's not the accent.

    I've seen the guy live for a few hours. He struggles with english, often doesn't know the words, and it's increasingly just a window shop for gone-on-for-too-long jokes and his column which he refuses to give any preview to.

    I don't doubt the guy's a good journalist. From the few articles I've struggled through with very weak Italian he gets some serious scoops, does decent work, and is generally very interesting.

    Unfortunately none of that translates to the podcast.

    I'll need to disagree with you - he's been a highlight of the podcasts for me. Horses for courses and all that.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Ok, answer me this.

    Other than light relief with the rather long running jokes about beaches (which sounds like bitches, which I presume is half the joke..), and Pozzato, what value does he add, content wise?

    He's always very evasive with his answers, and usually ends up giving a jokey answer to avoid actually answering. The guy knows an awful lot about Nibali and the rest of Italian cycling and we don't really get any of it.
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,232
    Straight answer? Italian? Eh?

    Light relief it is. Take your point that a lengthy in person sesh would be whole different experience to 3 minutes of jokery.

    Noted that Daniel F reined him back from the funnies during one or other of the last Giro episodes.
  • curium
    curium Posts: 815
    Ok, answer me this.

    Other than light relief with the rather long running jokes about beaches (which sounds like bitches, which I presume is half the joke..), and Pozzato, what value does he add, content wise?

    He's always very evasive with his answers, and usually ends up giving a jokey answer to avoid actually answering. The guy knows an awful lot about Nibali and the rest of Italian cycling and we don't really get any of it.
    He pops in for small segments of the podcast. He just adds to the entertainment. A bit like Lionel and his cassoulet obsession during the Tour.
  • joelsim
    joelsim Posts: 7,552
    He makes me want to switch off tbh. It was fine once but lost allure very quickly.
  • chrisday
    chrisday Posts: 300
    You're right, Rick, in that he's basically comic relief, and it could slide into annoying self-parody, but for me at least, they've got the Ciro balance about right. Adds a bit of light and shade to the overall package without detracting too much. And he's going to be much more strongly represented at the Giro.
    But do share your desire to tap in much more to his knowledge of Italian cycling.
    @shraap | My Men 2016: G, Yogi, Cav, Boonen, Degenkolb, Martin, J-Rod, Kudus, Chaves
  • jimmythecuckoo
    jimmythecuckoo Posts: 4,718
    Joelsim wrote:
    He makes me want to switch off tbh. It was fine once but lost allure very quickly.
    Grumpo :wink:
  • yorkshireraw
    yorkshireraw Posts: 1,632
    Thought the Giro stuff was excellent overall - do agree that Ciro does appear to be slipping into a bit of self-parody now - probably only needed / had him on as much as they did because it was the Giro.
    Come the tour when Nibali is not likely to win and they have a wider selection of guests (due to a higher presence of English-language media at the TDF) he will hopefully only make appearances when relevant.
    The French guy they had during the tour last year (can't recall his name without checking) was very good I thought, and the Dutch guy this time.

    I assume one of the reasons for most of the Giro coverage being 2 out of the 3 of the team was cost - at the tour they're all writing for magazines and in some cases newspapers as well as doing their own thing. Less commissions relating to the Giro would mean they're less able to spread the cost of having 3 of them on the road and in hotels / restaurants for 3 weeks.

    Whilst they're not 'pundits' as such and are not on TV (but are now effectively broadcasting) it highlights how embarrassingly poor a lot of UK sports coverage is - especially the 'old boys club' that is football co-commentators and pundits / analysts. The 1 dimensional idiots you get on talk-sport etc are shocking.

    To answer the earlier questions -

    Pairing - Friebe & Birnie - the high knowledge from one and the querying newness of the other played well IMO.
    Individual - Friebe - just knows his stuff and was in his element. Think he maybe finds the Tour a bit over-hyped.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,436
    Cj3mRzKWsAABDpP.jpg:large
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • stagehopper
    stagehopper Posts: 1,593
    Think Birnie's contributions are underrated - his daily summary of the stage is superbly succint without missing out on any of the important details. A very difficult skill.
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,253
    Think Birnie's contributions are underrated - his daily summary of the stage is superbly succint without missing out on any of the important details. A very difficult skill.
    He came through the traditional journo career path of working for the local paper. Good old fashioned reporting skills.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • jimmythecuckoo
    jimmythecuckoo Posts: 4,718
    Its the elephant in the room, but how bad was that folk music they used?