Tour de France 2013 - Race Chat
Comments
-
Above The Cows wrote:Turfle wrote:224
Do you want rice or noodles with that?
***** Pro Tour Pundit Champion 2020, 2018, 2017 & 2011 *****0 -
bompington wrote:Macaloon wrote:bompington wrote:As a mathematician, I would be able to tell you instantly that 14X16 is one less than 15X15. But I'm still none the wiser as to whether ff realises they don't have have the same answer...
Prove it.
QED
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruzwBbV2xwc...a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
Waw, how s'hit did this thread become?0
-
FocusZing wrote:Macaloon wrote:bompington wrote:As a mathematician, I would be able to tell you instantly that 14X16 is one less than 15X15. But I'm still none the wiser as to whether ff realises they don't have have the same answer...
Prove it.
13*15=195.........................14*14=196
224*226=50624................225*225=50625
4567*4569=20866623.....4568*4568=20866624
4*6=24................................5*5=25
14*16=224........................15*15=225
Notice the pattern.
Apologies for contributing into turning this into the Marcus du Sautoy thread.
LOVE THIS POST.“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
I'm amazed Frenchie hasn't dumped Black-Scholes, VaR or modified duration formulas into this thread0
-
Oh please don't get started on stuff like that because then I'll be forced to get involved. And I really don't want to.0
-
ThomThom wrote:Waw, how s'hit did this thread become?
It already was. Most useless thread ever. Littered with BS.Contador is the Greatest0 -
bompington wrote:Macaloon wrote:bompington wrote:As a mathematician, I would be able to tell you instantly that 14X16 is one less than 15X15. But I'm still none the wiser as to whether ff realises they don't have have the same answer...
Prove it.
QED
Good attempt but mine was better and easier to understand.Contador is the Greatest0 -
dsoutar wrote:I'm amazed Frenchie hasn't dumped Black-Scholes, VaR or modified duration formulas into this thread
Lol, but then I don`t really respect people who try and use language specific to their field when talking or interacting with others not in their field to appear clever.
They should read this quote from Einstein:
`You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother`Contador is the Greatest0 -
dsoutar wrote:I'm amazed Frenchie hasn't dumped Black-Scholes, VaR or modified duration formulas into this thread
big talk.. just a shame none of them relate to 14*160 -
Macaloon wrote:Milton50 wrote:RichN95 wrote:Eisel was a good road captain at HTC where he ran the sprint train. He's less use to a GC team if he's in the autobus. It's not like he's some tactical genius and the rest are numskulls. Sky picked the legs to do the job. They've all been around long enough to have a good idea what they're doing.
Well to put it another way: what does Stannard add that Eisel can't? Stannard may have marginally better legs for drilling it on the flat but there's not much in it. Eisel has spent years riding on the front of pelotons and leading out sprint trains. He's a big strong rider.
So I personally would say that when you have two riders who are fairly similar in ability I would have gone for the one with more experience. The thing is, it's easy to discount experience until you're in a situation when a split decision needs to be made about where to position yourself or whether to shut down an attack. Then it becomes valuable.
Thought the original was a cracking question, so... There might not be much in it in ability, but Stannard has shown some very big performances in crunch races: last two WCs, MSR this year. He's a more attacking/versatile rider who could credibly carry a stage-win threat from a variety of scenarios. Doubt Eisel is as flexible. Also Stannard might be more likely to stick around if he gets some Tour treats.
Also. The Classics squad were putting out the best numbers in recorded history. Ever. So now's the time to show it.
'tis fair points you is making, Maca. Once I'd had thought about it over a brew from my Bernie Rouleur mug *sad face*0 -
Geraint Thomas lives in Monaco fyi. Very Welsh.Contador is the Greatest0
-
Contador is the Greatest0 -
frenchfighter wrote:Geraint Thomas lives in Monaco fyi. Very Welsh.
I believe the desire to avoid taxes is an international trait. don't you get your bonus paid in fine wines and assos bibshorts?0 -
Crozza wrote:frenchfighter wrote:Geraint Thomas lives in Monaco fyi. Very Welsh.
I believe the desire to avoid taxes is an international trait. don't you get your bonus paid in fine wines and assos bibshorts?
made me chuckle.
I`m probably too honest for my own good sometimes.Contador is the Greatest0 -
Contador is the Greatest0 -
TailWindHome wrote:FocusZing wrote:Macaloon wrote:bompington wrote:As a mathematician, I would be able to tell you instantly that 14X16 is one less than 15X15. But I'm still none the wiser as to whether ff realises they don't have have the same answer...
Prove it.
13*15=195.........................14*14=196
224*226=50624................225*225=50625
4567*4569=20866623.....4568*4568=20866624
4*6=24................................5*5=25
14*16=224........................15*15=225
Notice the pattern.
Apologies for contributing into turning this into the Marcus du Sautoy thread.
LOVE THIS POST.
Apologies to all for asking, but surely that pattern must have a name; if it does what is it?0 -
yourpaceormine wrote:TailWindHome wrote:FocusZing wrote:Macaloon wrote:bompington wrote:As a mathematician, I would be able to tell you instantly that 14X16 is one less than 15X15. But I'm still none the wiser as to whether ff realises they don't have have the same answer...
Prove it.
13*15=195.........................14*14=196
224*226=50624................225*225=50625
4567*4569=20866623.....4568*4568=20866624
4*6=24................................5*5=25
14*16=224........................15*15=225
Notice the pattern.
Apologies for contributing into turning this into the Marcus du Sautoy thread.
LOVE THIS POST.
Apologies to all for asking, but surely that pattern must have a name; if it does what is it?
Don't know if it has a name but it is simple to prove:
(a-1) * (a+1) = a*a + a - a - 1 = a*a - 10 -
frenchfighter wrote:Geraint Thomas lives in Monaco fyi. Very Welsh.
My boss lives here in Wales, and she's still the Frenchest woman in Europe. What is your point?It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0 -
My point would be that GT was happy to take British Cycling/UK Lottery handouts whilst riding round in circles ... Now he has to pay his own way he's off to Monaco to avoid paying back to the country that allowed him to reach where he has in the sport ...0
-
frenchfighter wrote:Lol, but then I don`t really respect people who try and use language specific to their field when talking or interacting with others not in their field to appear clever.
What, like this?frenchfighter wrote:Glad I am long the Froome/Contador spread.
*runs and hides in corner*@shraap | My Men 2016: G, Yogi, Cav, Boonen, Degenkolb, Martin, J-Rod, Kudus, Chaves0 -
Crankbrother wrote:My point would be that GT was happy to take British Cycling/UK Lottery handouts whilst riding round in circles ... Now he has to pay his own way he's off to Monaco to avoid paying back to the country that allowed him to reach where he has in the sport ...
THAT is a fair point.It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0 -
frenchfighter wrote:bompington wrote:Macaloon wrote:bompington wrote:As a mathematician, I would be able to tell you instantly that 14X16 is one less than 15X15. But I'm still none the wiser as to whether ff realises they don't have have the same answer...
Prove it.
QED
Good attempt but mine was better and easier to understand.0 -
-
Salsiccia1 wrote:Crankbrother wrote:My point would be that GT was happy to take British Cycling/UK Lottery handouts whilst riding round in circles ... Now he has to pay his own way he's off to Monaco to avoid paying back to the country that allowed him to reach where he has in the sport ...
THAT is a fair point.
Surely it makes sense to stay in the UK when your main focus is the track, and there are excellent facilities available like Newport, Manchester and London velodromes, plus your coach, and other than Kennaugh, domestically based team mates on the pursuit squad. If he'd had years of funding, achieved nothing and then fudged off to avoid tax then I'd be a bit more annoyed.
Now he's focussing on the road, I don't blame him for living near the Alps. Dombroski, Boswell, Swift and Rowe are based in Nice, Porte and Froome in Monaco, makes sense to train on major climbs, in good weather and with team mates surely.0 -
^ as Andy says Sky have been setting up a base in Nice - nice warmer climate (usually), nice testing climby stuff - so several of the British guys are buying pads there. The new coach Shaun Stephens is also based there. The pros locate themselves wherever makes the most sense.
Better make sure their future tax affairs are sorted out better than Boonen's, though0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:I'm basically missing the entire tour.
Gutted
Sky left you off the squad too eh Rick?Correlation is not causation.0 -
Above The Cows wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:I'm basically missing the entire tour.
Gutted
Sky left you off the squad too eh Rick?
Its the elbow, innit. Poor Rick0 -
Richmond Racer wrote:Above The Cows wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:I'm basically missing the entire tour.
Gutted
Sky left you off the squad too eh Rick?
Its the elbow, innit. Poor Rick
More stuck in nyc doing 14hr days in office combined with abysmal internet at home and office0