Drugs in other sports and the media.
Comments
-
There's really no need for that ^, whether it was directed at me or anyone for that matter.
I certainly didn't expect a comment like that from you, it's out of character. If you have a problem with me, send me a PM and we'll thrash it out.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
To be fair the thread would have been a lot shorter if Ugo didn't keep being wrong!0
-
Pross wrote:To be fair the thread would have been a lot shorter if Ugo didn't keep being wrong!
180 pages, I probably intervened the first time at page 170... :roll:
I'd also like to point out that the thread refers to "other sports" and you keep going on about cycling TUEs
I'll take my coat nowleft the forum March 20230 -
ugo.santalucia wrote:I'll take my coat now0
-
bompington wrote:ugo.santalucia wrote:I'll take my coat now
Every one's a winner0 -
Wiggo on Newsnight in 15 mins. I presume it's about the TUE's.
Let's see how the BBC mangl..., sorry handle the story.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
Not exactly drugs... but let's salute the great Ross Tucker's role in exposing cheating everywhere in the world...
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/ ... tands-tall0 -
dish_dash wrote:Not exactly drugs... but let's salute the great Ross Tucker's role in exposing cheating everywhere in the world...
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/ ... tands-tall
I don't know that to make of that, nor the reference to SKY or Nike and what relevance it has. Or the reference to TUE's for that matter. Seemed like an interesting article with a hurried summary which attempted (in vain) to make a somewhat questionable point.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
Pinno wrote:dish_dash wrote:Not exactly drugs... but let's salute the great Ross Tucker's role in exposing cheating everywhere in the world...
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/ ... tands-tall
I don't know that to make of that, nor the reference to SKY or Nike and what relevance it has. Or the reference to TUE's for that matter. Seemed like an interesting article with a hurried summary which attempted (in vain) to make a somewhat questionable point.
I'm close to attributing the SKY nonsense directly to Tucker. That's all part of his standard spiel, it wouldn't surprise me if he went off topic n that direction in a telephone interview and it just got mashed into the article. It probably seemed to make sense at the time.Warning No formatter is installed for the format0 -
Yep, certainly had his sticky fingerprints over it though possibly mixed with the Guardian taking the chance to have a pop at a rival media group.0
-
Pross wrote:Yep, certainly had his sticky fingerprints over it though possibly mixed with the Guardian taking the chance to have a pop at a rival media group owned by Murdoch.
FTFY - they have never exactly been fans of him, have they? Diametrically opposed.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
Yep, exactly. Tucker and the paper both got their chance for a dig in a completely unrelated story.0
-
Only this forum is still talking about it, the rest of the world has moved on.'Performance analysis and Froome not being clean was a media driven story. I haven’t heard one guy in the peloton say a negative thing about Froome, and I haven’t heard a single person in the peloton suggest Froome isn’t clean.' TSP0
-
Sharapova ban reduced to 15 months
An International Tennis Federation statement says: "The Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) panel found that Ms Sharapova had a reduced perception of the risk that she took while using Mildronate, because (a) she had used Mildronate for around ten years without any anti-doping issue, (b) she had consulted the Russian doctor who prescribed the Mildronate for medical reasons, not to enhance her performance, and (c) she had received no specific warning about the change in status of meldonium from WADA, the ITF, or the WTA.
"In addition, the CAS panel considered that it was reasonable for Ms Sharapova to entrust the checking of the Prohibited List each year to her agent."
RE: the last statement, what happened to Strict Liability?0 -
dish_dash wrote:Not exactly drugs... but let's salute the great Ross Tucker's role in exposing cheating everywhere in the world...
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/ ... tands-tall
SKINS haven't done too badly out of the story overall, raised awareness of their brand (which I'd never heard of until the Rob Young cheating saga began) then (supposedly) high moral position in dealing with it.
The general point the Guardian article made is a fair one I thought.0 -
Surprised you haven't heard of SKINS before. Jamie Fuller is a self-styled crusader for ethics in sport and set up Change Cycling Now. He probably claims credit for bringing down McQuaid!0
-
I'd imagine Sharapova will get some abuse when she next steps on court. She might suffer a permanent, "inexplicable", drop in form! Time will tell.0
-
Pross wrote:Surprised you haven't heard of SKINS before. Jamie Fuller is a self-styled crusader for ethics in sport and set up Change Cycling Now. He probably claims credit for bringing down McQuaid!
He also funded that utter tosh "Not normal" nonsense from Vayer remember :roll:0 -
SPaM02 wrote:Sharapova ban reduced to 15 months
An International Tennis Federation statement says: "The Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) panel found that Ms Sharapova had a reduced perception of the risk that she took while using Mildronate, because (a) she had used Mildronate for around ten years without any anti-doping issue, (b) she had consulted the Russian doctor who prescribed the Mildronate for medical reasons, not to enhance her performance, and (c) she had received no specific warning about the change in status of meldonium from WADA, the ITF, or the WTA.
"In addition, the CAS panel considered that it was reasonable for Ms Sharapova to entrust the checking of the Prohibited List each year to her agent."
RE: the last statement, what happened to Strict Liability?
What an utter load of B.S.
I actually expected more of CAS to see through excuses like this and uphold the rule of strict liability.0 -
Anyone seen the tweets from Head Tennis congratulating Sharapova on the CAS decision. Yes you read it correctly, they have put out a statement congratulating her for getting a reduced ban! :shock:0
-
0
-
Once shared a very busy train carriage with the one at the front.
She sat on the floor. Like I was gonna give up my seat.0 -
What a fooking joke. It looks like drugs cheat Sharapova is clean-as-a-whistle, according to some of her sponsors.
http://www.the42.ie/nike-porsche-maria- ... 0-Oct2016/
I suppose that is acceptable given that tennis is, as we all know, a squeaking-clean sport and Sharapova's positive dope test result was obviously an aberration in the history of this spotlessly-clean sport. Quite right too!
DD.0 -
Dolan Driver wrote:What a fooking joke. It looks like drugs cheat Sharapova is clean-as-a-whistle, according to some of her sponsors.
http://www.the42.ie/nike-porsche-maria- ... 0-Oct2016/
I suppose that is acceptable given that tennis is, as we all know, a squeaking-clean sport and Sharapova's positive dope test result was obviously an aberration in the history of this spotlessly-clean sport. Quite right too!
DD.
http://www.espn.com/espn/otl/story/_/id ... o-accident0 -
Saw an interview with her today, and she said 'people take [Meldonium] like Aspirin in Russia.'
Ha ha ha.0 -
Dolan Driver wrote:What a fooking joke. It looks like drugs cheat Sharapova is clean-as-a-whistle, according to some of her sponsors.
http://www.the42.ie/nike-porsche-maria- ... 0-Oct2016/
I suppose that is acceptable given that tennis is, as we all know, a squeaking-clean sport and Sharapova's positive dope test result was obviously an aberration in the history of this spotlessly-clean sport. Quite right too!
DD.
I can't believe that rather than have the good grace to accept the reduced ban she goes on the attack against the ITF. First trying to shift the blame to them for not doing enough to publicize the changes to the prohibited list, and then has a moan about them trying to make an example of her to others - oh the irony!0 -
It really is a million miles away from Wiggins' treatment isn't it. The media seems to have decided he's now "dirty" yet Sharapova isn't getting that treatment despite failing an actual test...0
-
She's a looker though. Looks and sex appeal for marketing campaigns get you the big money, lawyers and better media treatment.
Which one would you have preferred on your teenage wall in a provocative pose? Wiggins or Sharapova?0 -
-