I don't believe Lance Armstrong and I never will...
Comments
-
It wasn't DDD-lite, it was "DDD, but lighter", coz, you know, you're fat and I'm not.DonDaddyD wrote:
The PM where EKE tries to chat up MsManc and she replies "You're just a DDD-lite" still hurts.
That's why he bites.FCN 3: Raleigh Record Ace fixie-to be resurrected sometime in the future
FCN 4: Planet X Schmaffenschmack 2- workhorse
FCN 9: B Twin Vitamin - winter commuter/loan bike for trainees
I'm hungry. I'm always hungry!0 -
-
EKE_38BPM wrote:
It wasn't DDD-lite, it was "DDD, but lighter", coz, you know, you're fat and I'm not.DonDaddyD wrote:
The PM where EKE tries to chat up MsManc and she replies "You're just a DDD-lite" still hurts.
That's why he bites.
That's a good one. You're only scrawny because you're ugly. So ugly in fact it's actually illegal for you to go past a certain weight. Authorities want to make sure there is less of you in the World.
And don't hate me because I'm beautiful.
Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
DonDaddyD wrote:EKE_38BPM wrote:
It wasn't DDD-lite, it was "DDD, but lighter", coz, you know, you're fat and I'm not.DonDaddyD wrote:
The PM where EKE tries to chat up MsManc and she replies "You're just a DDD-lite" still hurts.
That's why he bites.
That's a good one. You're only scrawny because you're ugly. So ugly in fact it's actually illegal for you to go past a certain weight. Authorities want to make sure there is less of you in the World.
And don't hate me because I'm beautiful.
I don't hate you. You're too insignificant to hate.
Do you realise that everytime you ride up Balham hill your extreme weight makes it a little bit lower, you cause damage to the roads you ride along, your California Bearing Ratio is too high, single-handly you are responsible for the worldwide food shortage, you don't get punctures like normal people, the air in your innertubes makes a bid for freedom from the load.FCN 3: Raleigh Record Ace fixie-to be resurrected sometime in the future
FCN 4: Planet X Schmaffenschmack 2- workhorse
FCN 9: B Twin Vitamin - winter commuter/loan bike for trainees
I'm hungry. I'm always hungry!0 -
The faster you go the heavier you become. Now you're just hating my awesome. When man evolved and developed a sense of self, did your offshoot of humanity evolve to develop the ability to hate?
Also
You look like you're taking sh*t when riding a bike:
Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
I was fighting the gravity field generated by your bulk. Also, you don't become heavier, you become more massive.DonDaddyD wrote:The faster you go the heavier you become. Now you're just hating my awesome. When man evolved and developed a sense of self, did your offshoot of humanity evolve to develop the ability to hate?
Also
You look like you're taking sh*t when riding a bike:
Its a good thing you ride so slowly or you'd become so massive you'd become a black hole. On the plus side, your stupid thoughts wouldn't escape and pollute the world.
I'm out.FCN 3: Raleigh Record Ace fixie-to be resurrected sometime in the future
FCN 4: Planet X Schmaffenschmack 2- workhorse
FCN 9: B Twin Vitamin - winter commuter/loan bike for trainees
I'm hungry. I'm always hungry!0 -
I think you'll find that physics was using gravity to keep you and your ugly at bay. From what, I don't know! But for a Universal concept to gain sentience and take action just to combat your ugly says something.EKE_38BPM wrote:
I was fighting the gravity field generated by your bulk. Also, you don't become heavier, you become more massive.DonDaddyD wrote:The faster you go the heavier you become. Now you're just hating my awesome. When man evolved and developed a sense of self, did your offshoot of humanity evolve to develop the ability to hate?
Also
You look like you're taking sh*t when riding a bike:
Its a good thing you ride so slowly or you'd become so massive you'd become a black hole. On the plus side, your stupid thoughts wouldn't escape and pollute the world.
I'm out.
And yes, I do ride slowly because I am massive.
Your ex girlfriend told you didn't she? I'm sorry you had to find out that way. Hurt's doesn't it?
I said the same to her.Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
For 2 black fellas that's some really poor trash talk.
It's like listening to 2 Irishmen rap.“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
Mum cusses are off-limits. Chasey, is on patrol.TailWindHome wrote:For 2 black fellas that's some really poor trash talk.
It's like listening to 2 Irishmen rap.Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
-
TailWindHome wrote:For 2 black fellas that's some really poor trash talk.
It's like listening to 2 Irishmen rap.
Well if we are talking Irish rap, you'd be hard pressed to beat If you want a ride I've got a horse outside. Play it twice and you'll be singing the chorus...
If you like what you hear there may be a vacancy for DDD or EKE to join the cool kids
Nobody told me we had a communication problem0 -
-
the affidavits from USADA's witnesses are all dated between Sept. 21 and Oct. 9, 2012, well AFTER the "communication" of June 12 and the life ban of July 10
Yeah I wondered about that too...
Interesting read in context of Greg's comments way back at the start of this thread on how he'd begin a defence.“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
Don't you even...TailWindHome wrote:the affidavits from USADA's witnesses are all dated between Sept. 21 and Oct. 9, 2012, well AFTER the "communication" of June 12 and the life ban of July 10
Yeah I wondered about that too...
Interesting read in context of Greg's comments way back at the start of this thread on how he'd begin a defence.
Because when I said that I wouldn't commit 100% to agreeing Armstrong took drugs and was guilty of the other stuff (but probably was) you shouted me down and some called me idiot. What I was saying was in line with Greg's point.G66 wrote:by way of further clarification, many will see the report as giving finality; the truth at last laid bare, if you will. As a lawyer, I see it as the opening salvo in what would have been a long battle. Now there isn't going to be a battle, because one side's decided they don't want to fight. But experience tells me that whilst parts of the truth may be in the opening salvo, it is very unusual for the opening salvo to be 100% accurate without embellishment or mistake. Every lawyer knows that their case will take some hits, and they armour plate it accordingly.Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
DonDaddyD wrote:
Don't you even...TailWindHome wrote:the affidavits from USADA's witnesses are all dated between Sept. 21 and Oct. 9, 2012, well AFTER the "communication" of June 12 and the life ban of July 10
Yeah I wondered about that too...
Interesting read in context of Greg's comments way back at the start of this thread on how he'd begin a defence.
Because when I said that I wouldn't commit 100% to agreeing Armstrong took drugs and was guilty of the other stuff (but probably was) you shouted me down and some called me idiot. What I was saying was in line with Greg's point.G66 wrote:by way of further clarification, many will see the report as giving finality; the truth at last laid bare, if you will. As a lawyer, I see it as the opening salvo in what would have been a long battle. Now there isn't going to be a battle, because one side's decided they don't want to fight. But experience tells me that whilst parts of the truth may be in the opening salvo, it is very unusual for the opening salvo to be 100% accurate without embellishment or mistake. Every lawyer knows that their case will take some hits, and they armour plate it accordingly.
Nah. At best he might have a technical legal defence, but the truth is out there now.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:
If I had a valid defence, I'd probably submit a defence document rather than stick it on my blog. I was laughing out loud by point 8 - so Armstrong was paying for tips on saddle height adjustment. O-kaaaay... :roll:0 -
Doesn't matter, at this stage it isn't wrong to say that the 'reasoned decision' is probably accurate or that Lance is probably guilty of the accusations.Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
BigMat wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:
If I had a valid defence, I'd probably submit a defence document rather than stick it on my blog. I was laughing out loud by point 8 - so Armstrong was paying for tips on saddle height adjustment. O-kaaaay... :roll:
I said it was interesting, not credible.
Yeah, posting it on your blog is the way to go. He didn't say much about the $1million Lance paid him though. Seems a bit much for saddle height advice, if he had been nicer to Lemond he would have worked it out for him....“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
It appears that Mr Armstrong has stepped down as chairman of Livestrong.
Edit: and Nike are terminating his contract.
Read into that what you will."If you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you've always got."
PX Kaffenback 2 = Work Horse
B-Twin Alur 700 = Sundays and Hills0 -
I wouldn't read too much into it.
Many people who have court cases bought against them lose their jobs despite their apparent innocence or the fact that they are innocent until proven guilty.
Nike are thinking about its reputation and Livestrong probably had a Board battle that Lance lost because his tarnished reputation could be seen to damage the Charity's profile. This probably would have all happened sooner had he decided to fight the case.Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
NIKE statement: http://nikeinc.com/press-release/news/n ... -armstrong0
-
About time Nike. At least their statement is unambiguous.
- 2023 Vielo V+1
- 2022 Canyon Aeroad CFR
- 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX
- Strava
- On the Strand
- Crown Stables
0 -
'Seemingly insurmountable evidence' = he probably did it. They ain't saying that he did do it.
Just saying....Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
DonDaddyD wrote:'Seemingly insurmountable evidence' = he probably did it. They ain't saying that he did do it.
Just saying....
Well they can hardly say he did, imagine the lawyers would have a field day. But they've not left much room for doubt. Time for Trek, Oakley etc now. I wonder how SRAM feel about all this?- 2023 Vielo V+1
- 2022 Canyon Aeroad CFR
- 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX
- Strava
- On the Strand
- Crown Stables
0 -
Whether he admits to it or not, Lance is 'phlucked', and because he didn't attempt to defend himself it makes his credibility mean nothing. Honestly, I do not know where he goes from here. Even if he remains a free man, it would take a marketing genius to to save the Armstrong Brand - unless he was to go into pharmaceuticals or something...Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
How much of Trek and SRAM does he own?Il Principe wrote:DonDaddyD wrote:'Seemingly insurmountable evidence' = he probably did it. They ain't saying that he did do it.
Just saying....
Well they can hardly say he did, imagine the lawyers would have a field day. But they've not left much room for doubt. Time for Trek, Oakley etc now. I wonder how SRAM feel about all this?0 -
JonGinge wrote:
How much of Trek and SRAM does he own?Il Principe wrote:DonDaddyD wrote:'Seemingly insurmountable evidence' = he probably did it. They ain't saying that he did do it.
Just saying....
Well they can hardly say he did, imagine the lawyers would have a field day. But they've not left much room for doubt. Time for Trek, Oakley etc now. I wonder how SRAM feel about all this?
I dunno. Both are privately held. He invested several million in SRAM so it can't be very significant.- 2023 Vielo V+1
- 2022 Canyon Aeroad CFR
- 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX
- Strava
- On the Strand
- Crown Stables
0 -
Tried to find the figures but agree that it's probably not a great deal.Il Principe wrote:JonGinge wrote:
How much of Trek and SRAM does he own?Il Principe wrote:DonDaddyD wrote:'Seemingly insurmountable evidence' = he probably did it. They ain't saying that he did do it.
Just saying....
Well they can hardly say he did, imagine the lawyers would have a field day. But they've not left much room for doubt. Time for Trek, Oakley etc now. I wonder how SRAM feel about all this?
I dunno. Both are privately held. He invested several million in SRAM so it can't be very significant.0 -
If he doesn't end up jailed and bankrupt I think he'd have to count that as a win.0
