decision in Armstrong Case and Dennis's Skiiing trip to Vail
Comments
-
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/w ... index.html
That precedent has been, if anything, strengthened since then. In 2008, the U.S. Senate ratified the UNESCO Convention, a treaty created to give governments a legal framework to address doping in sport, mandating that criminal investigators share information with their national anti-doping agencies.
"There are no legal hurdles" to the U.S. Attorney's office working with USADA, says one international official familiar with this case. "If they don't [hand evidence over], it will be because they're sitting on overwhelming evidence of drug cheating in sport. It will be an international sports doping cover-up of the worst sort."Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
iainf72 wrote:http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/austin_murphy/02/14/Is-Armstrong-investigation-really-over/index.html
"... an international sports doping cover-up of the worst sort."
I had thought that Birotte had already tried to effect such a cover up...
And since when does the USA adhere to international agreements, unless it suits them to do so?0 -
iainf72 wrote:http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/austin_murphy/02/14/Is-Armstrong-investigation-really-over/index.html
That precedent has been, if anything, strengthened since then. In 2008, the U.S. Senate ratified the UNESCO Convention, a treaty created to give governments a legal framework to address doping in sport, mandating that criminal investigators share information with their national anti-doping agencies.
"There are no legal hurdles" to the U.S. Attorney's office working with USADA, says one international official familiar with this case. "If they don't [hand evidence over], it will be because they're sitting on overwhelming evidence of drug cheating in sport. It will be an international sports doping cover-up of the worst sort."
Cycling's got it all eh? Winners, losers, lovers, haters, devils, angels and now international conspiracies!
What more could you want?0 -
A graph, of course!Rick Chasey wrote:What more could you want?0 -
-
Rick Chasey wrote:
Err, Iain?bompington wrote:
A graph, of course!Rick Chasey wrote:What more could you want?
You rang?
Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
Is it me, or is Iain's graph giving us the finger?0
-
ratsbeyfus wrote:Is it me, or is Iain's graph giving us the finger?
I think he's a closet LA fan.0 -
LeicesterLad wrote:ratsbeyfus wrote:Is it me, or is Iain's graph giving us the finger?
I think he's a closet LA fan.
Who isn't? Bestestest cyclist of all time we're talking about here
0 -
Moray Gub wrote:I coudlnt give sh*t about LA he has retired and we move on but i must confess i do take some enjoyment from the discomfort that will be felt all through the forum by the so called experts and know alls who predicted the end of LA and his orginisations.It may happen one day but not for a while it would seem.
from Feb that is, about the fed case0
