Motorised cycle discussion!

doodoo_voodoo

I may imply something by communicating it.

You may infer something by your interpretation of that communication

The inference is made by the person receiving the information and the implication is made by the person providing the information.

Just thought you'd like to know.

cooldad

Er OK. Did I miss something?

tom_howard

Yeah, our favourite power assisted cyclist doesn't like that we all think he touches kids where they wee, and likes to use big words to tell us this. Which we think is hilarious.

doodoo_voodoo

Just saying that if he's purporting to be a grammatical intellectual (which, from his tortured prose, it seems that he is), he could at least use the correct words in the correct context.

Anonymous

You've all scared him away now
THIS is why we can't have nice things.

cooldad

It's all doodoo_voodoo's fault for trying to be sensible in CC - idiot.

tom_howard

To be fair, not many folk could have withstood 17 pages of abuse, fair play to him, even if he was an utter retard/genius/hero/child catcher.

Anonymous

Not many people deserve it in the first place. This was a special case.

cooldad

I get the feeling he enjoyed it. Here is a pic of him in his riding gear.

crazy88

You see, if only he was into cycling he'd have lost all that weight as he'd have had to pedal uphills.

KitsuneAndy

Come on, he was just trolling.

Right?

I have to believe it was a troll. My brain can't deal with the fact that someone could possibly think any of this contraption was a good idea.

Please tell me it's not real.

getonyourbike

Tom Howard wrote:

even if he was an utter retard/genius/hero/child catcher.

That made me Nobody knows what he is :P

doodoo_voodoo

cooldad wrote:

It's all doodoo_voodoo's fault for trying to be sensible in CC - idiot.

Sorry - I was drunk.

Kaise

we scared hiom away and you know why - he couldnt handle the truth thats why!

all i did was highlight his failings and point out the underlying aim of his contraption, he didnt like it, simple.

tom_howard

KitsuneAndy wrote:

Come on, he was just trolling.

Right?

I have to believe it was a troll. My brain can't deal with the fact that someone could possibly think any of this contraption was a good idea.

Please tell me it's not real.

I'd love to, but theres enough photographic and video evidence suggest that he is serious, and really is that much of a d!ck.

Fabian2

Tom Howard

Posted Fri Aug 5, 2011 8:07 am
Yeah, our favourite power assisted cyclist doesn't like that we all think he touches kids where they wee, and likes to use big words to tell us this. Which we think is hilarious.

---

Tom are you confirming that this is also your own personal view and also supportive of the other member on here who brought forward this idea that i engage in such mentioned activity.

Referenced material:

Yeah, our favourite power assisted cyclist doesn't like that we all think he touches kids where they wee, and likes to use big words to tell us this. Which we think is hilarious.

RevellRider

The lady doth protest too much, methinks

Gazlar

I'm confused now, who exactly has got a motorised child toucher?

Richie63

Gazlar wrote:

I'm confused now, who exactly has got a motorised child toucher?

Quite legal in NSW by all accounts, um where is G Glitter by the way?

MattC59

I don't often visit CrudCatcher, but was recommended to read this thread. I have to say; an epic thread !!!!


Am I missing something here though ?
If he didn't drag all the additional sh!t around, he wouldn't need the motor, and if he didn't have the motor, he wouldn't need need to drag all the additional sh!t around.
eeerm............ doesn't that mean that........... eeerm........... a normal bike would do the job ?

This is an epic case of creating a solution to a problem that doesn't exist ! :roll:
Genius !!!

Gazlar

Yes but that's already been invented, he needs to create something so as to deflect attention for the other things he's become infamous for

Ryan Jones

Yeah, except a 40ft long bike-train riding along paths with 4 year old kids in the trailers isn't going to be the definition of inconspicuous is it ?

desweller

I quite like it.

Gazlar

Ryan Jones wrote:

Yeah, except a 40ft long bike-train riding along paths with 4 year old kids in the trailers isn't going to be the definition of inconspicuous is it ?

depends on if it's got a 2 stroke motor

infact is that his nickname? 2 stroke?

Ryan Jones

He'd probably prefer 2 strokes, less personal that way

tom_howard

Fabian, are you trying to get me to say/do something I might regret? Have you done that before? Is that your top tip for grooming?

[sensible]
In all seriousness, what is your motivation to carry this thread on? I think I'm right in thinking that 18 pages ago you wanted advice on fixing your mech, which after making yourself out as a pretentious prick (you did), you got an answer. The 'discussion' then segwayed onto the machine (and I use use the word quite wrongly) you ride around on and the forum had a field day tearing strips off you yet you kept coming back for more by being vague, pious, and self rightious. Admittedly some of the other members were just as bad but hey, we give as good as we get. Your comments have mean't weve taken a dislike to you, so we've turned up the wick on the taking of the piss, we dont really think you interfere with children (well, I cant speak for EVERYONE) but we cast a line and you took it hook, line and sinker. We do however think you're a knob (if you aren't, you come across as one), and if we take the piss enough you'll go away. No such luck so far though, but rest assured weve got plenty in reserve. (incase your'e compiling a file on us, that wasnt a threat, merely a statment of fact).

Remember, this is a public forum on the internet, grow a thick skin and expect to take in what you dish out. [/sensible]

Right, that's that out the way, now back to the piss taking....

Kaise

no i think he touches children, he gets too angry when you say it so he must do!

Ben6899

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57p2uOK4g6Q

Right?

Just promise you won't bring it with you when you move to Shepherd's Bush.

MaxwellBygraves

What a fantastic thread. Had me in stitches. Thank you.

tom_howard

yeehaamcgee wrote:

You've all scared him away now
THIS is why we can't have nice things.

I think hes gone for good now. Cant work out how I feel about it. :?

Pros,
He's gone
I dont have to think about his ridiculous machine.
I dont have to talk to an alledged (sp?) (not by me) paedophile.

Cons
He's gone, this has been the funniest thread for ages!
We might have been able to abuse some sense into him
We might have convinced him to find grown ups attractive (not indicating he doesnt already)

Anything I've missed?