The beginners guide to chinese carbon wheels

11415171920

Comments

  • smidsy
    smidsy Posts: 5,273
    amaferanga wrote:
    smidsy wrote:
    I have just fitted Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX and the new ones are indeed 320tpi.

    £46 for the pair from Ribble.

    Good price that - they're over £30 each now.
    Result :)
    Yellow is the new Black.
  • smidsy
    smidsy Posts: 5,273
    ShutUpLegs wrote:
    Should be good for 2000 miles.
    3years cycling for under 50 pounds _ result :)
    Yellow is the new Black.
  • ShutUpLegs
    ShutUpLegs Posts: 3,522
    Mine lasted 4 months. Just notice Probikekit have them for £26.95, but there is a £5 off £50 voucher doing the rounds so £47.90 for 2.
  • amaferanga
    amaferanga Posts: 6,789
    ShutUpLegs wrote:
    Mine lasted 4 months. Just notice Probikekit have them for £26.95, but there is a £5 off £50 voucher doing the rounds so £47.90 for 2.

    Clinchers?
    More problems but still living....
  • ShutUpLegs
    ShutUpLegs Posts: 3,522
    Yeah, haven't see tubs that cheap apart from bike-discount.de
  • petemadoc
    petemadoc Posts: 2,331
    Ribble are doing the tubs for £31.19

    and planet x have veloflex master clinchers for £29.99 . Best price I've seen on these.
  • oli2001
    oli2001 Posts: 350
    Just to give feedback on my experence.
    My first pair i bought 50mm clinchers from carbonzone. built with novatec hubs, weighed 1550gms. Paid about £350 including about £20 customs. very happy with them(braking not great and non-existent in the wet), did about 1500kms and sold them as part of a bike sale. Bought a 2nd pair of 50mm clinchers from Gofar sports (xiamen) built with Edhubs? sapim cx rays and weigh 1350 gms! yes really!!
    they have a basalt braking surface and i use swissstop pads and this makes them every bit as good as alloy rims for braking, even in the wet. Had these for about 800 kms so far and generally very chuffed with them. will be interested how long hubs last? paid £450 including £22 customs.Only took 11 days from order to my door too.
    Overall, really impressed with wheels and service received.
  • apjs87
    apjs87 Posts: 35
    Does anybody have a review of 38mm clinchers please?

    Also pics if poss. close to clicking the buy button
  • I had a pair of 38mm clinchers. Beautiful wheels and am now looking at getting another set as I sold them due to funds being a bit tight at the time. 59eb4048.jpg
    20c0ed14.jpg
  • duckson
    duckson Posts: 961
    Anyone bought from carbonwheels2011 on ebay before?

    Specifically looking at these 38mm clinchers:- http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/281068615161? ... 1438.l2649

    Or recommend another seller for a similar price/weight/spec.
    Cheers, Stu
  • Danny87
    Danny87 Posts: 121
    I have no experience of buying from that seller but I'd probably go for these other wheels he or she has for sale
    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/New-38mm-carb ... 3f221aae6c

    They are a little bit heavier but safer due to Alu brake track.

    Maybe check out some of the group buy deals they have on the velobuild website.
  • oli2001
    oli2001 Posts: 350
    i've used carbonzone and farsports. great service from both. farsports have better/lighter wheels
  • alan61
    alan61 Posts: 10
    OK, I've finally ordered some 50mm carbon wheels from Carbonzone and am now in the process of sourcing some tyres and tubes (went with clinchers for convenience but shall be using them for flat/undulating races). Seems like the Vittoria open corsa evo cx or theContinental grand prix 4000 as regards the tyres. Can anyone with experience of these wheels point me towards a good innertube and what would the length of the valve need to be, 60,62 or 80mm? Cheers guys.
  • ugo.santalucia
    ugo.santalucia Posts: 28,325
    At least 80 mm...
    left the forum March 2023
  • alan61
    alan61 Posts: 10
    Thanks Ugo, just a thought because I can get cheaper 60mm tubes couldn't I use these and use a valve extender just to pump up the tubes and then remove?
  • mroli
    mroli Posts: 3,622
    when you have removed the valve extender, how do you screw down the valve to close it?
  • amaferanga
    amaferanga Posts: 6,789
    Some valve extenders such as Topeak ones allow you to close the valve using the extender.

    80mm valves are more than long enough - no need for anything longer. You might even get away with 60mm valves depending on what pump you use.
    More problems but still living....
  • alan61
    alan61 Posts: 10
    mroli wrote:
    when you have removed the valve extender, how do you screw down the valve to close it?

    I was thinking if I use a tube with a 60mm valve (which protrudes from the rim but not enough to attach a pump effectively to) and attach a valve extender to the valve I could then pump up the tube and then remove the extender and close the valve by hand.

    Does this make sense?
  • willy b
    willy b Posts: 4,125
    Alan - That's what I did on my 50mm. Until I ran out of 60mm tubes that is. Now I just leave the valve open.
  • alan61
    alan61 Posts: 10
    willy b wrote:
    Alan - That's what I did on my 50mm. Until I ran out of 60mm tubes that is. Now I just leave the valve open.


    Do you use a short valve tube with a valve extender?
  • willy b
    willy b Posts: 4,125
    alan61 wrote:
    willy b wrote:
    Alan - That's what I did on my 50mm. Until I ran out of 60mm tubes that is. Now I just leave the valve open.


    Do you use a short valve tube with a valve extender?

    Yeah. Works fine.
  • mroli
    mroli Posts: 3,622
    alan61 wrote:
    I was thinking if I use a tube with a 60mm valve (which protrudes from the rim but not enough to attach a pump effectively to) and attach a valve extender to the valve I could then pump up the tube and then remove the extender and close the valve by hand. Does this make sense?
    Yep - that does.
    amaferenga wrote:
    Some valve extenders such as Topeak ones allow you to close the valve using the extender
    As does that :D
  • alan61
    alan61 Posts: 10
    Gordon Bennet..............All I want to know, though I'm half suspecting I can, is whether I can use 60mm valve length innertubes on Carbonzone 50mm clinchers and if the valve length protrusion from the rim is not sufficient to fit a track/hand pump to then can I use a valve extender of any length just to inflate the tyres and then remove the extender. I'm thinking of the type of extender that fits over the valve rather than the one that involves removing the core, etc.

    Phew, or should I just buy 80mm valve length inner tubes for an easy life. :roll:
  • alan61 wrote:
    Gordon Bennet..............All I want to know, though I'm half suspecting I can, is whether I can use 60mm valve length innertubes on Carbonzone 50mm clinchers and if the valve length protrusion from the rim is not sufficient to fit a track/hand pump to then can I use a valve extender of any length just to inflate the tyres and then remove the extender. I'm thinking of the type of extender that fits over the valve rather than the one that involves removing the core, etc.

    Phew, or should I just buy 80mm valve length inner tubes for an easy life. :roll:
    should work fine
  • alan61
    alan61 Posts: 10
    Thanks :D
  • smidsy
    smidsy Posts: 5,273
    But may not. Depends on your pump head. Rim depth includes brake track though, so you have a little extra than 10mm.
    Yellow is the new Black.
  • ugo.santalucia
    ugo.santalucia Posts: 28,325
    Tonight I finally got the chance to inspect a set of these Chinese carbon clinchers: Bitex hubs, 50 mm deep rims in Matt weave with no ceramic particles on the brake track... and black Pillar bladed spokes with silver alloy nipples.
    The build was very mediocre... The rear was true but with very low and inconsistent tensions. I have measured 70 KgF on the drive side as an average, which is very low by any standard, the non drive side was too low to be measured. I suppose the rims don't take much more without cracking. The front was not true, an offset of 0.7 mm was measured, which is a bit pathetic really. The nipples were not aligned particularly well, with spokes almost bending at the nipple. The front tension was about 40-50 KgF, again very low, with a few spokes too low to measure.
    Overall, very poor build, assembled quickly and with poor quality control... Is this hat he fuss is all about? Save your money
    left the forum March 2023
  • ShutUpLegs
    ShutUpLegs Posts: 3,522
    They must be selling shedloads though :shock:
  • amaferanga
    amaferanga Posts: 6,789
    Tonight I finally got the chance to inspect a set of these Chinese carbon clinchers: Bitex hubs, 50 mm deep rims in Matt weave with no ceramic particles on the brake track... and black Pillar bladed spokes with silver alloy nipples.
    The build was very mediocre... The rear was true but with very low and inconsistent tensions. I have measured 70 KgF on the drive side as an average, which is very low by any standard, the non drive side was too low to be measured. I suppose the rims don't take much more without cracking. The front was not true, an offset of 0.7 mm was measured, which is a bit pathetic really. The nipples were not aligned particularly well, with spokes almost bending at the nipple. The front tension was about 40-50 KgF, again very low, with a few spokes too low to measure.
    Overall, very poor build, assembled quickly and with poor quality control... Is this hat he fuss is all about? Save your money

    So you've inspected one set of Chinese wheels and concluded that all are equally bad? Sorry, but that's just ridiculous. Would you accept me concluding that your wheels are crap because I got some wheels from Dave Smith in the UK and the build was poor?
    More problems but still living....
  • ugo.santalucia
    ugo.santalucia Posts: 28,325
    amaferanga wrote:
    Tonight I finally got the chance to inspect a set of these Chinese carbon clinchers: Bitex hubs, 50 mm deep rims in Matt weave with no ceramic particles on the brake track... and black Pillar bladed spokes with silver alloy nipples.
    The build was very mediocre... The rear was true but with very low and inconsistent tensions. I have measured 70 KgF on the drive side as an average, which is very low by any standard, the non drive side was too low to be measured. I suppose the rims don't take much more without cracking. The front was not true, an offset of 0.7 mm was measured, which is a bit pathetic really. The nipples were not aligned particularly well, with spokes almost bending at the nipple. The front tension was about 40-50 KgF, again very low, with a few spokes too low to measure.
    Overall, very poor build, assembled quickly and with poor quality control... Is this hat he fuss is all about? Save your money

    So you've inspected one set of Chinese wheels and concluded that all are equally bad? Sorry, but that's just ridiculous. Would you accept me concluding that your wheels are crap because I got some wheels from Dave Smith in the UK and the build was poor?

    That's right, investigating a tiny batch and making generalisations, this is what a forum is all about. :lol:
    I am allowed to have opinions like everybody else... it's up to people to make what they want of them. The only difference with any other opinion you will read on this thread is that you can see some numbers to back up the opinions.
    I had inspected a similar set in the past and found similar faults, but they were used, so one can't draw conclusions on something that has been used. These were out of the box.

    Beside the build quality, which can be inconsistent across the many suppliers and maybe some are a lot better, there are few rims manufacturers and these particular rims, with matt weave and no extra brake surface are quite common on Ebay and I have seen loads on this forum... I assume they all come from the same place. The engineering is quite primitive and I have seen carbon rims from 10 years ago better built. Certainly the Gigantex rims that I have occasionally used are a lot better than these, which appear to come from the early days of carbon fibre manufacturing.
    left the forum March 2023