Arrest warrant issued for landis

1235»

Comments

  • BikingBernie
    BikingBernie Posts: 2,163
    iainf72 wrote:
    For someome who has so much to say, why didn't he submit a question for Lance when Procycling did their interview with him?
    As you well know, he was never going to give an honest answer to any of the questions that are worth asking...
  • CakeHag1
    CakeHag1 Posts: 24
    Thanks Disgruntledgoat - have a piece of cake on me-

    Back to topic - It's one thing for a cyclist to admit guilt. There has to be a helluva lotta pressure on these guys. Over the last few years since this Landis incident occurred, I've had four docs all give me different opinions on the case, based on what is publicly known. All I'm saying is, regarding the hacking, what was the motivation? None of us may ever be able to say but that is what I would like to know.

    Oh, and thanks for the clarification on the USADA, SunWuKong - I'm sure none of us would like to see the underlying science in these cases become a joke in the courts, US or otherwise
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    BikingBernie wrote:
    iainf72 wrote:
    For someome who has so much to say, why didn't he submit a question for Lance when Procycling did their interview with him?
    As you well know, he was never going to give an honest answer to any of the questions that are worth asking...

    If you asked the right question you could get an interesting response and get added to the blacklist.
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • dennisn
    dennisn Posts: 10,601
    BikingBernie wrote:
    iainf72 wrote:
    For someome who has so much to say, why didn't he submit a question for Lance when Procycling did their interview with him?
    As you well know, he was never going to give an honest answer to any of the questions that are worth asking...

    I DIDN'T know that. Or maybe I'm not one of the YOU that you're talking about? How come everybody knows all these things but me?
  • The Prodigy
    The Prodigy Posts: 832
    Well he didn't answer Iain's question did he?
  • sampras38
    sampras38 Posts: 1,917
    BikingBernie wrote:
    iainf72 wrote:
    BikingBernie wrote:
    Of course he could redeem himself. All he has to do is come clean and tell all he knows about USP, Armstrong, motorcycles with refrigerated panniers and the rest...
    You mean redeem himself to you? If you've already decided some IM's constitute evidence of this, why do you need a filthy lying American capitalist cheat Franco-phobe like Floyd to confirm it for you?
    :roll: I meant redeem himself in the Biblical sense, after all isn't he supposed to be the God-fearing member of some Christian cult?

    He was raised in that sort of environment as a youngster but don't think he lives that sort of life anymore. Not for years.
  • sampras38
    sampras38 Posts: 1,917
    BikingBernie wrote:
    iainf72 wrote:
    Do you think the UCI allowed him to get caught as revenge for that time he tried to get a contract dispute sorted out and had a lot of difficultly with the UCI?
    More likely he was shopped by Armstrong's mob in a follow up to the 'blood bag down the sink' incident. A lot of those who show 'disloyalty' to Armstrong seem to have similar things happen to them :wink:

    You at it again Bernie??
  • BikingBernie
    BikingBernie Posts: 2,163
    sampras38 wrote:
    BikingBernie wrote:
    iainf72 wrote:
    Do you think the UCI allowed him to get caught as revenge for that time he tried to get a contract dispute sorted out and had a lot of difficultly with the UCI?
    More likely he was shopped by Armstrong's mob in a follow up to the 'blood bag down the sink' incident. A lot of those who show 'disloyalty' to Armstrong seem to have similar things happen to them :wink:
    You at it again Bernie??
    Here 'more likely' does not mean 'very likely'. :wink:

Categories