Ah, why women get their own bike frames

Sewinman

Funny thread. I feel cheated though, I commute in London and have never seen any evidence of said cleavage!

skyd0g

It's very unusual to find the air-bags have deployed themselves so-far in advance of a collision. :?

Rich158

That's going to ruin her modulus of elasticity :shock:

I think she's in dire need of some coaching, and I know just the person

Oddjob62

Sewinman wrote:

Funny thread. I feel cheated though, I commute in London and have never seen any evidence of said cleavage!

Whereabouts do you travel through. Usually at least a couple of nice views in the Regents park area, esp round the Gloucester Gate corner heading South.

Kieran_Burns

woodyonthebeach wrote:

i want to be hill she rides down

Mate. They ARE the hill she rides down! :shock:

Cafewanda

[spits out sarnie on laptop]


I applaud the serious discussion of this thread, but could you post a safety message to cover laptops in protective plastic? :roll:

R_T_A

Cripes!

**Saves as wallpaper**

That brings a whole new meaning to "Full Suss".

I wonder if she has a Hardtail as well?

hisoka

lost_in_thought wrote:

woodyonthebeach wrote:

lost_in_thought wrote:

woodyonthebeach wrote:

thrown in for good measure. If the Jiggle is good enough will it have an effect of there FCN

Oh really?

Interesting.... :twisted:

ok maybe not then. LiT I bow before you in sorrow at suggesting such a thing

It was more a 'sees opportunity to go to FCN 8' reaction than anything else...

Only with photographic/video evidence for the reason to change FCN! :twisted:

NGale

DonDaddyD wrote:

skyd0g wrote:

NGale wrote:

it seems that with the cycling lads down in Dartmouth I have crossed that line between one of the lads to 'the bird on a bike with a nice ars*' :shock:

It all came about after wearing a low cut top to a social even and then drunkly riding around the streets of Dartmouth wearing said low cut top, trousers and heels! :shock:

Ye gads! That top must have been cut pretty damned low to be showing your ars*!!!! :shock:

What will the 'Good Commander' say!?

funnily enough he gets p***y when a couple of the guys hang back behind me now

The new lycra shorts were a mistake methinks, baggies on Friday I think

woodyonthebeach

Cafewanda wrote:

[spits out sarnie on laptop]


I applaud the serious discussion of this thread, but could you post a safety message to cover laptops in protective plastic? :roll:

dont know what you do on your laptop............... :shock:

skyd0g

....any-hoo chaps, we appear to have strayed off the pusuit of science there, in the appreciation of the fair young maidens bountiful talents.

It occured to me after some deep thought, that however I juggled my calculation figures, they were failing to balance... :?
...and then, POW! :shock: There it was, staring me in the face!
...now, Mother Nature's creations, as beautiful as they are, are seldom created perfectly symmetrical.
...I feel we may have to allow a plus or minus 5% here as a weighting allowance?
...your thoughts, chaps? 8)

Cafewanda

woodyonthebeach wrote:

Cafewanda wrote:

[spits out sarnie on laptop]


I applaud the serious discussion of this thread, but could you post a safety message to cover laptops in protective plastic? :roll:

dont know what you do on your laptop............... :shock:

:P

Rich158

I think 5% may be a bit too much as an average. I think some further research should be conducted over lunchtime

prawny

R_T_A wrote:

Cripes!

**Saves as wallpaper**

That brings a whole new meaning to "Full Suss".

I wonder if she has a Hardtail as well?

I do!

dennisn

I thought that, like everything else in this world, womens bikes were made for "the special needs of a women".

UndercoverElephant

skyd0g wrote:

....any-hoo chaps, we appear to have strayed off the pusuit of science there, in the appreciation of the fair young maidens bountiful talents.

It occured to me after some deep thought, that however I juggled my calculation figures, they were failing to balance... :?
...and then, POW! :shock: There it was, staring me in the face!
...now, Mother Nature's creations, as beautiful as they are, are seldom created perfectly symmetrical.
...I feel we may have to allow a plus or minus 5% here as a weighting allowance?
...your thoughts, chaps? 8)

From previous research it would appear that the larger of the two is the most likely to burst forth at an opportune moment. Surely when we are working out such matters, the probability of burstage should depend on the larger of the two?

There was a young woman from Divises,
Her norks were of two different sizes.
One was so small,
it was no use at all.
The other was big, and won prizes.

R_T_A

UndercoverElephant wrote:

skyd0g wrote:

....any-hoo chaps, we appear to have strayed off the pusuit of science there, in the appreciation of the fair young maidens bountiful talents.

It occured to me after some deep thought, that however I juggled my calculation figures, they were failing to balance... :?
...and then, POW! :shock: There it was, staring me in the face!
...now, Mother Nature's creations, as beautiful as they are, are seldom created perfectly symmetrical.
...I feel we may have to allow a plus or minus 5% here as a weighting allowance?
...your thoughts, chaps? 8)

From previous research it would appear that the larger of the two is the most likely to burst forth at an opportune moment. Surely when we are working out such matters, the probability of burstage should depend on the larger of the two?

I don't think symmetry is necessarily an issue, although the mass certainly should be taken into consideration.

Are we talking lateral movement as well? With insufficient support, a lady's Tshirt may start to look like it's on a spin cycle (pardon the pun). I have witnessed this, and also managed to avoid the oncoming tree.

d21dga

UndercoverElephant wrote:

skyd0g wrote:

....any-hoo chaps, we appear to have strayed off the pusuit of science there, in the appreciation of the fair young maidens bountiful talents.

It occured to me after some deep thought, that however I juggled my calculation figures, they were failing to balance... :?
...and then, POW! :shock: There it was, staring me in the face!
...now, Mother Nature's creations, as beautiful as they are, are seldom created perfectly symmetrical.
...I feel we may have to allow a plus or minus 5% here as a weighting allowance?
...your thoughts, chaps? 8)

From previous research it would appear that the larger of the two is the most likely to burst forth at an opportune moment. Surely when we are working out such matters, the probability of burstage should depend on the larger of the two?

There was a young woman from Divises,
Her norks were of two different sizes.
One was so small,
it was no use at all.
The other was big, and won prizes.

Woah there don't get ahead of yourself, I think more research is called for before any conclusions are drawn. Surely any supporting garment will be sized in relation to the larger of the two? Therefore would there not be less support and hence less resistance to an OOB than for the 'fuller' side?

roger_merriman

Sewinman wrote:

Funny thread. I feel cheated though, I commute in London and have never seen any evidence of said cleavage!

I live and commute around and though leafy parks/past river so i possibly see more than my fair share?

which of coarse is hard burden to bare, but some one has too....

skyd0g

UndercoverElephant wrote:

skyd0g wrote:

....any-hoo chaps, we appear to have strayed off the pusuit of science there, in the appreciation of the fair young maidens bountiful talents.

It occured to me after some deep thought, that however I juggled my calculation figures, they were failing to balance... :?
...and then, POW! :shock: There it was, staring me in the face!
...now, Mother Nature's creations, as beautiful as they are, are seldom created perfectly symmetrical.
...I feel we may have to allow a plus or minus 5% here as a weighting allowance?
...your thoughts, chaps? 8)

From previous research it would appear that the larger of the two is the most likely to burst forth at an opportune moment. Surely when we are working out such matters, the probability of burstage should depend on the larger of the two?

There was a young woman from Divises,
Her norks were of two different sizes.
One was so small,
it was no use at all.
The other was big, and won prizes.

Hmmm, I would say that depends on whether we're counting highest wins, or a matching pair?

secretsam

UndercoverElephant wrote:

There was a young woman from Divises,
Her norks were of two different sizes.
One was so small,
it was no use at all.
The other was big, and won prizes.

It's Devizes, don't you know

And before the mods step in and destroy this thread, my congratulations to all posters, however, have pity on us poor souls whose ride is primarily on the business of the A40 in London, where eyeballs remain 100% on the road/cars/buses/psycho-RLJ'ing cyclists/motorbike fiends

Repeat after me: I will not gawp, I will not gawp.

On which note, what is correct procedure when identified as being too interested in the intricate stitching used on a laydeeez top? <<AHEM>> :oops:

-spider-

I just contacted Brianiac to see if they could help. Some Richard Hammond fellow answered and said that although he would like to help our research does not come within the term 'science abuse' and so we were on our own.

He also said that he was a petrol head and if we don't stop our nonsense he would set Geronimo (possibly misheard) on us.

Rich158

dennisn wrote:

I thought that, like everything else in this world, womens bikes were made for "the special needs of a women".

They're not designed by men then, we obviously wouldn't have a clue

cee

I think i can assist this research......

with this....

http://www.shockabsorber.co.uk/bounceometer/shock.html

kaboom!

pintoo

I'm rather late to this discussion, but perhaps I can compensate with a link to another useful research resource:
http://www.bikesmoveus.com.au/showthrea ... 445&page=7

woodyonthebeach

pintoo wrote:

I'm rather late to this discussion, but perhaps I can compensate with a link to another useful research resource:
http://www.bikesmoveus.com.au/showthrea ... 445&page=7

good link

Oddjob62

pintoo wrote:

I'm rather late to this discussion, but perhaps I can compensate with a link to another useful research resource:
http://www.bikesmoveus.com.au/showthrea ... 445&page=7

This is a serious scientific research thread, please don't reduce it to blatant perving at pretty girls on bikes :x

ps bookmarked

skyd0g

Oddjob62 wrote:

pintoo wrote:

I'm rather late to this discussion, but perhaps I can compensate with a link to another useful research resource:
http://www.bikesmoveus.com.au/showthrea ... 445&page=7

This is a serious scientific research thread, please don't reduce it to blatant perving at pretty girls on bikes :x

ps bookmarked

Chapeau Sir!
...now then, back to the weighting allowance. I suggested 5% as a total, rather than a per-side allowance. I wouldn't like to suggest that our laydees are listing to port like a ship in distress or anything like that. So, would the studious amongst us agree to a plus or minus 2.5% per-side allowance for weighting?

CiB

Takes me back to Christmas 1978, when I was give the Jazz album by Queen [a gramophone record by crikey] and in it was a glossy poster of a load of naked young fillies on bicycles. Discretely shot of course. The weak links were the tracks Bicycle Races, and Fat Bottomed Girls, IIRC. Happy days.

Christophe3967

pintoo wrote:

I'm rather late to this discussion, but perhaps I can compensate with a link to another useful research resource:
http://www.bikesmoveus.com.au/showthrea ... 445&page=7

Don't let anyone tell you Oz women are hotter :?