How heavy is your bike?

Gareth
Gareth Posts: 9,944
edited June 2008 in XC and Enduro
I'm starting to get bike weight conscious as my tastes change from purely descents, to a bit of everything.

I haven't weighed my bike, but at a guess, I believe its 35Ib+. Which is a lot for a hardtail!

I'm getting over the fact it only has 9 gears, as many people do single speed XC.

So how much does your bike weigh?
«1345

Comments

  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,675
    12KG fully :wink:
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • FSR_XC
    FSR_XC Posts: 2,258
    No idea;

    It is heavy enough to be structurally sound and stable when at speed and light enough to lift the front over obstacles and hop when needed.

    I just ride it.
    Stumpjumper FSR 09/10 Pro Carbon, Genesis Vapour CX20 ('17)Carbon, Rose Xeon CW3000 '14, Raleigh R50

    http://www.visiontrack.com
  • Andy B
    Andy B Posts: 8,115
    My hardtail weigh approx 28lbs, my susser weighs approx 29lbs.
    2385861000_d125abe796_m.jpg
  • Thewaylander
    Thewaylander Posts: 8,594
    My house mate weighed my Spec last night for me, 28.5lbs (stumpy FSR)

    rock on lightest bike in a house of bikers!
  • xcman27
    xcman27 Posts: 72
    hello..


    stumpjumper fsr pro...26.4.... :)
  • Gareth
    Gareth Posts: 9,944
    Think I'm going to have to weigh mine.

    is standing on bathroom scales holding the bike then minus my weight from the total accurate enough? Any other methods?
  • Matteeboy
    Matteeboy Posts: 996
    Apparently 24lbs but I think that's probably a little optimistic so i'd plump for 25lbs.
    Certainly felt light when I carried it one armed in this pic... :lol:

    MeCrossing.jpg

    We had a couple of river crossing and on another tricky one (submerged stepping stones, fast flowing river) one me and another rider helped over 20 riders with their bikes.

    One REALLy stood out as being super light - A Klein Attitude (I think) Race with V brakes - must have been sub 20lbs. The rest all seemed very similar - mid to high 20s.

    Definitely a point where light becomes "too fragile" and "silly expensive" - nice to have a light bike but also nice to have one that's relatively sturdy.
    Two Stumpjumpers, a Rockhopper Disk and an old British Eagle.

    http://www.cornwallmtb.kk5.org
  • James_F
    James_F Posts: 137
    I have a fairly budget spec hardtail so probably about 30lbs I'd guess - which will go up when I fit sturdier forks. Starting with something a bit heavy is certainly good for the fitness and you do notice the difference on something lighter, but I'd much rather have strength and stability than something super lightweight. Or the elusive balance between the two that everyone tries to aim for.
  • KonaMike
    KonaMike Posts: 805
    The stock weight of a Fury is 29.3 lbs but a few upgrades have shaved about a pound off so i would say 27.5 lbs....ish :wink:
  • Gareth
    Gareth Posts: 9,944
    Maybe mine isn't as heavy as I think... its got a light mavic 519 wheelset on hope xc hubs, raceface seat post, michellin hot s kevlar tyres, cranks are truvativs on an isis fsa bb.

    I guess the heavy areas would be the forks, chain device, hope m4 disc brakes, wellgo pedals, and not forgetting the frame!

    Might just be 30ish Ib insteaded of the predicted 35Ib+

    th_27308Bike.jpg
  • Blundell
    Blundell Posts: 308
    Dunna know.. sub 22 ponds I reckon.
  • ride_whenever
    ride_whenever Posts: 13,279
    I think mine is around 27 pounds, but it has pikes on the front and is steel.
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Idrive is 30lbs
    Ruckus is 31lbs
    Zaskar is 22.7lbs
  • endurojcb
    endurojcb Posts: 170
    Spesh Enduro SL FSR 07 - 29lb's I think!?!? Not bad for 6" of travel front and rear!
    2007 Merlin Malt 4
  • god1406
    god1406 Posts: 554
    Rocky Ridge - 30lbs
    Eldridge Grade - 26/27lbs
    Kona Stuff - 31lbs
    Scott Purgatory - 26lbs
    BMX - 30lbs (i think)
    Unicycle - light :)

    I have no idea how much the tandems weigh...
  • my carbon ht weighs around the 24/25lb mark, and when i had the xc full susser built up itr was 27/28lb,

    funnily enough i was working out where i could save some more weight on the bike! forks can save 1 1/2lb as mine are 4.3lb iirc bars, stem, seatpost, saddle and wheelset i recon i could get it down to 20/21lb!
    that however isnt as cheap as it seems so htink i will be Gradually doing as and when i need bits! (then all the spares can go on the full susser again!
    Timmo.
    After all, I am Cornish!
    http://cornwallmtb.kk5.org/
    Cotic Soul, The bike of Legends!:wink: Yes, I Am a bike tart!
    http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtop ... 1#16297481
  • Gareth
    Gareth Posts: 9,944
    Timmo, what are the real benefits of getting down to a true light weight bike?

    Easier on climbs? Faster top speed on flats?

    Would a negative outcome be your muscles won't get stronger as quick due to the resistence of a heavy bike? (Think runners dragging a tyre tied to their waste) lol
  • Matteeboy
    Matteeboy Posts: 996
    Timmo - what full susser have you got?

    Your carbon HT does feel pretty light.
    Two Stumpjumpers, a Rockhopper Disk and an old British Eagle.

    http://www.cornwallmtb.kk5.org
  • FSR_XC
    FSR_XC Posts: 2,258
    Why not lower your centre of gravity instead?

    This way you get a better handling, more stable bike.
    Stumpjumper FSR 09/10 Pro Carbon, Genesis Vapour CX20 ('17)Carbon, Rose Xeon CW3000 '14, Raleigh R50

    http://www.visiontrack.com
  • Gareth
    Gareth Posts: 9,944
    FSR_XC wrote:
    Why not lower your centre of gravity instead?

    This way you get a better handling, more stable bike.

    Good advice. I've lowered my stem, and rolled my bars forward a fraction, and moved the saddle along the rails and straightened the saddle out. My ride position is more leaning forwards and not hanging off the back now.

    Riding with lockout on the forks, lowers my bottom bracket height as well, making it feel more stable, great for climbs. When I unlock the forks and get the full 5" travel up front back, I gain a slacker head angle, perfect for descents.

    I'm pretty happy with this set up really. I think its just the weight bugging me, or perhaps the lack of gears.
  • FSR_XC
    FSR_XC Posts: 2,258
    Sorry, I was being sarcastic.

    The easiest way for 90% of people to save weight is to eat a little less.

    What bike have you got?
    Stumpjumper FSR 09/10 Pro Carbon, Genesis Vapour CX20 ('17)Carbon, Rose Xeon CW3000 '14, Raleigh R50

    http://www.visiontrack.com
  • Gareth
    Gareth Posts: 9,944
    FSR_XC wrote:
    Sorry, I was being sarcastic.
    Don't apologise. Its ok.
    FSR_XC wrote:
    The easiest way for 90% of people to save weight is to eat a little less.
    5ft11in around 12 and a half stone. But point taken.
    FSR_XC wrote:
    What bike have you got?

    Posted this on the previous page. It may shed some light on my concern.

    Click on it to enlarge.
    th_27308Bike.jpg
  • FSR_XC
    FSR_XC Posts: 2,258
    Thought about buying an XC bike?

    Even after weight loss, I can't imagine the geometry will do you any favours climbing or on XC singletrack.
    Stumpjumper FSR 09/10 Pro Carbon, Genesis Vapour CX20 ('17)Carbon, Rose Xeon CW3000 '14, Raleigh R50

    http://www.visiontrack.com
  • god1406
    god1406 Posts: 554
    That Curtis is lurvley.
  • Gareth
    Gareth Posts: 9,944
    I'm tempted... but not convinced.

    I'm not doing 12 hour all day long rides. Just a couple of hours into Epping Forest and stuff. Few descents, few climbs, few jumps.

    I find XC bikes awkward to ride. The saddle being a lot higher then the bars doesn't feel natural, certainly for drops.

    Maybe something like a specialized hardrock would be cool for me?
    http://www.evanscycles.com/product.jsp? ... gn=froogle

    ?
  • ride_whenever
    ride_whenever Posts: 13,279
    Geometry is much more important than weight. My scott was pretty light, about 27 pounds, but didn't go up hills because it was a dj frame.

    For your riding buy a 456 some xc triple ring cranks and use the rest of the stuff from that bike.
  • stumpyjon
    stumpyjon Posts: 4,069
    I think my Kinesis build is going to come in at about 24.8 lbs, been weighing every bit as I build it up. Just ordered some Titanium bolts to block the bottle cage mounting holes and some carbon headset spacers. Won't make a blind bit of difference to the weight but I don't care. Already shaved 8 kg off weightwise this year (me) so that's been my biggest improvement (no wonder I always felt sluggish).
    It's easier to ask for forgiveness than for permission.

    I've bought a new bike....ouch - result
    Can I buy a new bike?...No - no result
  • Matteeboy
    Matteeboy Posts: 996
    Respect for going for climbs on that bike though!

    Looks like a proper Jump/DH rig to me.

    I sometimes use our Rockhopper Disk for the odd ride with proper ascents- about 4lbs heavier than my Stumpy, I hardly notice the difference on climbs.

    I'd say concentrating on strength/power is more beneficial than turning yourself into a 10 stone whippet.
    Two Stumpjumpers, a Rockhopper Disk and an old British Eagle.

    http://www.cornwallmtb.kk5.org
  • Gareth wrote:
    Timmo, what are the real benefits of getting down to a true light weight bike?

    Easier on climbs? Faster top speed on flats?

    Would a negative outcome be your muscles won't get stronger as quick due to the resistence of a heavy bike? (Think runners dragging a tyre tied to their waste) lol

    i would say a lot quicker accelerating, easier to throw into a corner, a lot more nimble i suppose! and yes a bit better up the hills! and anyone thats ridden with me knows i need all the hill help i can get hahaha! speed wise, i dont think it would make that much differ3ence but may just use less energy to get there!!
    MATTEYBOY wrote:
    Timmo - what full susser have you got?

    Your carbon HT does feel pretty light.

    the full susser is much like my carbon frame in that its not a well known make! i believe its a Curcuit atb frame! but much like the older ('01) bianchi sussers and very similar to the kona sex one, bare frame weigh's 6.5lb, was a greaty bike for me to step up from my old Cough supermarket Cough bike and taught me a lot more about riding, but the Carbon ht is in another league to it! so much more precise! and a lot nicer to ride!
    quick pic of the f/s
    PICT0428640.jpg


    Mark, I'd love to loose a couple of stone of weight! that way i would be a bit fitter, feel better, etc. but just cant seem to shift it at the mo! do a lot of walking around the village due to not having my car on the road at the mo and the weekly cycling but cant seem to get below 14st! but then i have been around that weight since i was 16! (same build as now) also part of the ilness cause weight to go up and down a bit! wish it went down more than up lol!

    will make sure i try and ahve a Good poo before each ride! that should save a few pounds!;)
    Timmo.
    After all, I am Cornish!
    http://cornwallmtb.kk5.org/
    Cotic Soul, The bike of Legends!:wink: Yes, I Am a bike tart!
    http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtop ... 1#16297481
  • Belv
    Belv Posts: 866
    You see that tank over there?
    In the army barracks?

    My bike weights slightly more than the barracks!