Euro 2024 thread

1151618202146

Comments

  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 22,029

    Are you saying they should get an even less experienced manager and pay them less, or pay more for a manager who is also unlikely to get them playing as a team?

    Perhaps I just have very low expectations.

  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228

    I don't care too much, just want to see some chaos.

  • MidlandsGrimpeur2
    MidlandsGrimpeur2 Posts: 2,129
    edited June 26

    The thing I don't understand is this line that gets trotted out ad nauseum that people want to see exciting football. Under which manager since Alf Ramsey has anyone seen exciting England football? Capello, Keegan, Hodgson, Eriksson, Mclaren, Taylor, Greenwood?? Hoddle had one good game against Argentina which we lost. People forget at Euro 96 we were dire against the Swiss and should have lost to Spain. The wins against Scotland and Holland were Venables high points. Robson was a top bloke, but in football terms at Mexico 86 we lost and were very lucky to make the semis in 1990, Cameroon were far better in the qtr final. Southgate has made a semi and a final, we were excellent against France in 2022. Before this euros we have qualified for ko stages easily, beaten Germany, won tricky ties against Sweden, Senegal, Ukraine easily, won pen shootouts, and aside from the odd frustrating performance, have generally played far better football than any England side since 1996.

    My point again is that for all the rationalising, this is nothing to do with performances, it's a Southgate issue, fans don't like him. It has very little to do with the football.

    Good luck to the England 'fans' when he is gone and we are back to 2nd round knockouts and early group stage exits again.

  • mrb123
    mrb123 Posts: 4,833

    Georgia currently playing like Brazil!

  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,394

    Shows what happens if you put a proper cross of St George on the shirt.

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    edited June 26

    England draw Slovakia in the next 16 with a very soft run to the final.

  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,394

    You have to say Southgate has had extraordinary fortune with the draws in major finals.

    I bet they will still find a way to fuck it up.

  • MidlandsGrimpeur2
    MidlandsGrimpeur2 Posts: 2,129
    edited June 26

    I'd actually preferred the Netherlands. As I said earlier, it would have been an open game and more of a challenge which may have sprung England into action.

    I fear Slovakia will just be a continuation of the group stages.

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660

    That England game is gonna be grim. Rest of the tournament looks pretty exciting

  • MidlandsGrimpeur2
    MidlandsGrimpeur2 Posts: 2,129

    Just realised Ukraine got more points than Slovenia but are out as they finished 4th in their group. What a load of BS, they achieved better results so should go through.

  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,108
    edited June 26


    Disagree - Southgate's growing unpopularity is football related. With the squad he has available and the luck he's had with favourable draws and playing the last Euros at home his results are not that impressive.

    It's not just that though - it's the way those results are achieved with mind numbing football and the way his negative approach has snatched defeat from the jaws of victory on a few important occasions.

    Look yes of course he has strengths as a manager - but his strengths are the ones fans don't see. What they do see are the tactical frailties, the inability to adapt, the increasingly uninspiring leadership. And of course some of the criticism goes a bit far but that's not unique to England. He's stayed on for a tournament or two too long - the FA should have read the room let him go after tne world cup or even the last euros. Op

    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,657

    Yea, and previously I think Southgate's teams have done well and that the criticism has been misplaced. The performance at previous tournaments has all been well sufficient to see him stay on in the role.

  • MidlandsGrimpeur2
    MidlandsGrimpeur2 Posts: 2,129

    Let's change tack now the KO stages are here.

    Which games are people looking forward to and which are best avoided. Three picks:

    Must watch game?

    Dark horse (the game that looks meh on paper but could throw up a decent game or even a surprise result)

    Must avoid (you can't pick your home team!)

    My choices are:

    Must watch - Georgia Vs Spain. Could be a really good attacking game with lots of goals.

    Dark Horse - Germany V Denmark. I don't think it will be a surprise result but possibly a good tactical battle that could end up with penalties.

    Must avoid - Switzerland v Italy. Haven't been impressed with either, just has 0-0 and ET written all over it.

  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228

    Can't argue with the must watch: Spain v Georgia

    Dark Horse: Romania v Netherlands. Both let in goals, could go either way.

    One to miss: Portugal v Slovenia. Will be like England v Slovenia without the cutting edge.

  • MidlandsGrimpeur2
    MidlandsGrimpeur2 Posts: 2,129

    Good shout on dark horse. Yes, Portugal v Slovenia isn't high on my list either.

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660

    Austria Turkey is surely going to be the most exciting?!

  • MidlandsGrimpeur2
    MidlandsGrimpeur2 Posts: 2,129

    Could well be a good game, although I wonder if Austria might just be too strong for them and be a bit one sided? Will definitely watch it though.

  • laurentian
    laurentian Posts: 2,568

    I would love to see England scoring more goals however, I do think that interantional tournament football is very different to the football we are "used to" in the European leagues. I refer to my post at the start of this thread: In tournament football DO NOT LOSE.

    Yes, it may be turgid, boring to watch and not to everybody's liking but finishing top of the group and through to the last sixteen is EXACTLY the result that England need right now. In that respect, it is very difficult to criticise Southgate. Get through one way or another and value the clean sheet as much as any goal.

    As someone eluded to further up, what is the England performance over the past 50 years that people yearn for?

    Again, as someone mentioned up thread, '96 vs the Dutch was almost certainly the highlight in this respect - 30 years ago and 30 years had elapsed since their last "great" performance in 1966. How does Alf Ramseys reecord stack up against Southgate? He is rightly lauded for having won the World Cup. Apart from that, one third place ('68 Euros) and quarter finals of 1970 WC and 1972 Euros. The greatest by virtue of winning the World Cup but Southgate is categorically and evidentially the best since. England could get knocked out on Sunday and those facts would still be the same - that seems to justify Southgate's tactics to me and is a record he should be proud of. Any other manager (inlcuding some great people) are simply not comparable to Southgate - certainly not in my living memory.

    Furthermore, can anyone name more than 2 international teams that have gone through a whole tournament having won every game by 2+ goals? Or one that didn't have a disappointing draw in the group stages?

    Wilier Izoard XP
  • Dorset_Boy
    Dorset_Boy Posts: 7,611

    The issue with the way England have played during the group matches is that if you fail to create more than one or two goal scoring chances, then you seriously increase the chance that you will lose. Any side can score a breakaway goal, such as the first Georgian goal last night. And guess what, a side that passes the ball around but failed to create chances, ended up losing.

    It's similar to sitting back on a one goal lead. It's a very dangerous strategy.

    Southgate has been lucky, and being a lucky manager or team is a definite plus, but with the talent available to him, England really should have been creating a dozen or more chances against the weak opposition they have faced, and putting a couple of those chances away.

  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228

    If Denmark had nicked a goal against Serbia we wouldn'thave been top would we? It's welcome, but it's not some great tactical masterplan.

  • laurentian
    laurentian Posts: 2,568

    Sure, but England were through anyway . . . which is kinda (almost!) the point.

    A WC quarter,a WC semi and a Euro final suggests something a little more than "luck". The group they were in was a consequence of their performances prior to the start of the tournament and their finishing position within the group down to the results they got in it, again, not luck.

    I am as disappointed with England's performance so far in this tournament as anyone given my sky high expectations, but I struggle with Southgate getting so much of a slagging off for a win and two draws so far.

    Wilier Izoard XP
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,228

    I think the team are doing what he sends them out to do pretty well, it's just really boring. We could well bore our way to the final having made it into the boring half of the tournament.

  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660

    Not a subscriber to Napoleon's "rather a lucky general than a good one"? attitude?

  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,108

    Must watch - France Belgium. 2 potential winners - Belgium have created a lot of chances so could be a threat here

    Dark Horse match - Austria - Turkiye.

    One to miss - for neutrals it has to be England trying to break down a well organised Slovakia

    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,108
    edited June 27

    We tried to "not lose" when Croatia came back and beat us in 18 and when Italy came back in euro 20 - in both games we sat back and it did not work. You have to win games of football to win cups, tournaments and leagues - and there are different approaches - I'm not arguing a negative approach can't work but I've yet to see a convincing argument as to why it's an approach particularly suited to tournaments.

    Re looking back in time - there are tournaments where for me we were genuinely unlucky or an act of stupidity brought about our downfall. Germany 96, departing unbeaten in 86?, Maradona's handball in 90, Rooney's red card against Portugal, Rooney's metatarsal injury, Beckham's red against Argentina, several penalty shootouts. Yes give some credit to Southgate but you'd think we have never been competitive since 66 the way some talk.

    The other thing is Southgate's football is f'ing dull. I read a stat that the Xg for both the Serbia and Slovenia games was lower than for every single premier league game last season. Then there is that (I seriously thought it was a joke initially ) pic of our players average positions between scoring and conceding against Denmark - it's just depressing defeatist and the inly possible enjoyment that can be had from it is post facto .


    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • seanoconn
    seanoconn Posts: 11,740

    My England starting line up for last 16

    Pickford

    Walker

    Stones

    Guehi

    Trippier

    Rice

    Bellingham

    Mainoo

    Foden

    Gordon

    Palmer

    Saka

    Kane

    Solid, can’t find fault with that 😎

    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • MidlandsGrimpeur2
    MidlandsGrimpeur2 Posts: 2,129

    Anyone watching Switzerland that things Eng have got an easy draw may wish to rethink!

  • wakemalcolm
    wakemalcolm Posts: 943

    Wow, the Italians can barely be bothered to chase a game at nil-nil. They're toast.

    ================================
    Cake is just weakness entering the body