Make it open too. With cut off times as per the real thing. Let's see who makes it past the first day. Not sure how you'd check for digital cheating though.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.
Do 3 weeks of virtual races in a row if you must, but don't insult peoples intelligence by calling it a real race...
It doesn't matter if you assign the real TdF trophy or not... it's down to giving motivation to the athletes and feeding fans with something to look forward to.
I agree there could be qualifiers in June on Zwift (or other platform) to put together a few non PRO-teams
Do 3 weeks of virtual races in a row if you must, but don't insult peoples intelligence by calling it a real race...
I mean, races on Zwift clearly are real races...
Whether they meet your definition of a *bike* race though, fair enough and I mostly agree. Having done quite a bit of Zwift riding this week, it certainly feels like a real race insofar as you want to win and it's damn hard! Obviously it misses some of the key elements of proper bike racing, so it is only a substitute for riding outdoors, but beggars and choosers etc.
I think there is scope to do something reasonably entertaining on Zwift, myself. If they got the coverage right, I'd watch just for the novelty factor to begin with.
A lot of the pros and teams are doing group rides on Zwift at the moment (like the sportives they sometimes do in real life), where you can ride around and do a bit of Q&A with them. So many of them are probably already set up for it.
you cant have a sprinter protected for 100 miles and then pull out at the end and win a race.. virtual stuff isnt there to do a proper tour yet, what do you do with all the domestiques etc ?
you cant have a sprinter protected for 100 miles and then pull out at the end and win a race.. virtual stuff isnt there to do a proper tour yet, what do you do with all the domestiques etc ?
Course might need to be tweaked... it could be an interesting experiment, nobody expects it to be the real Tour or that the winner would go down in history as a TdF winner or even just a stage winner
you cant have a sprinter protected for 100 miles and then pull out at the end and win a race.. virtual stuff isnt there to do a proper tour yet, what do you do with all the domestiques etc ?
I thought Zwift allowed for wind and drafting. If so then yes, it is.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.
I'd love to see how Zwift would implement/render 21 new stage routes. Given the paucity of routes currently available it would be "some challenge" to do that.
“You may think that; I couldn’t possibly comment!”
Wilier Cento Uno SR/Wilier Mortirolo/Specialized Roubaix Comp/Kona Hei Hei/Calibre Bossnut
I'd love to see how Zwift would implement/render 21 new stage routes. Given the paucity of routes currently available it would be "some challenge" to do that.
Not to mention that (I think) there are only two routes on the platform that even get close to the kind of distances pros do in a race (the uber pretzel and the Ride London course), and neither are likely to be selective enough to make racing interesting among pros.
A platform designed for overweight dentists isn't a great environment to truly test the best riders in the world.
I'd love to see how Zwift would implement/render 21 new stage routes. Given the paucity of routes currently available it would be "some challenge" to do that.
Not to mention that (I think) there are only two routes on the platform that even get close to the kind of distances pros do in a race (the uber pretzel and the Ride London course), and neither are likely to be selective enough to make racing interesting among pros.
A platform designed for overweight dentists isn't a great environment to truly test the best riders in the world.
You'd have to do laps like in the Worlds. So yeah would make doing the actual TdF difficult unless they employ a boatload of programmers and make them work round the clock, probably. That's not to say they couldn't do something moderately interesting on Zwift while there is no actual pro racing going on.
you cant have a sprinter protected for 100 miles and then pull out at the end and win a race.. virtual stuff isnt there to do a proper tour yet, what do you do with all the domestiques etc ?
I thought Zwift allowed for wind and drafting. If so then yes, it is.
Yes, it does allow for drafting, quite effectively as well. We have been doing virtual club rides on it the last week or so, the peloton effect is very noticeable.
I'd love to see how Zwift would implement/render 21 new stage routes. Given the paucity of routes currently available it would be "some challenge" to do that.
.......
A platform designed for overweight dentists isn't a great environment to truly test the best riders in the world.
Is that why half the pro peloton have been using it for the last couple of years? Or do you just enjoy insulting a couple of hundred thousand people? There's no need to be a complete Tool.
Zwift could easily create a route that included say the mega pretzel plus the Alpe - that would be selective. Also don't expect the same guys that win IRL to win in a virtual world.
Lappartient has probably got the UCI lawyers trying to kill it.
The key thing is going to be getting the broadcast right. When I've seen Zwift stuff done live like that it isn't very engaging - you need the app maker on board to make something compelling (i.e. broadcast style where you can see what is actually going on in the race).
And again, nobody says stages need to be 200 km... in fact I think they need to be a lot shorter for a virtual format to be interesting, ideally 2-3 hours stages. I would probably look at 6 time trials, 3 flat (maybe one as TTT) and 3 up a mountain. 6 stages on varied terrain of about 100 km and 6 mountain stages of maybe 60-80 km each.
you cant have a sprinter protected for 100 miles and then pull out at the end and win a race.. virtual stuff isnt there to do a proper tour yet, what do you do with all the domestiques etc ?
I'd you got dropped in zwift, you would definitely want domestiques to help you back.
Lappartient has probably got the UCI lawyers trying to kill it.
i prefer Rouvy to Zwift, the real world videos make it much more engaging for me. Not done a race \ group ride so dont know how it works with drafting either.
Nice to see another platform try something, the virtual world is more than just Zwift
I'd love to see how Zwift would implement/render 21 new stage routes. Given the paucity of routes currently available it would be "some challenge" to do that.
.......
A platform designed for overweight dentists isn't a great environment to truly test the best riders in the world.
Is that why half the pro peloton have been using it for the last couple of years? Or do you just enjoy insulting a couple of hundred thousand people? There's no need to be a complete Tool.
Zwift could easily create a route that included say the mega pretzel plus the Alpe - that would be selective. Also don't expect the same guys that win IRL to win in a virtual world.
I've been on the site for years, and it's been noticeable in that time that practically all of the new routes have been largely flat with the odd short hill on them. The only climb even remotely resembling something they do in the real Tour is the Alpe, and it's hardly enough to build a pro race around.
It's also clear from looking at the race schedule on Zwift that the vast majority are run on those same largely flat routes with the odd short hill on them. Very few go up the Epic KOM, and even fewer go up the Alpe. Given that Zwift clearly have the data that shows the routes people use most often, and keep producing the same kind of flat courses, it's not exactly a great leap to suggest that most riders want flat courses rather than Alpine climbs.
The biggest obstacle to hitting your power interval PBs indoors compared to outdoors is lack of heat adaption (which results in higher heartrate indoors towards your threshold power), along with not enough air movement from fans and not enough water.
High resistance on a turbo just feels awful and doesn't reflect what climbing feels like
Probably depends on the turbo and settings. My wheel-on KK Rock n Roll semi smart gave me a 60W advantage over the Neo 2T. On road testing v virtual same routes says the Neo was fairly accurate. Quicker in fact due to lack of concern about blind corners/junctions and potholes.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.
High resistance on a turbo just feels awful and doesn't reflect what climbing feels like
You are going to break the heart of all those dentists climbing the Alpe du Zwift in an hour...
I found it fairly close to my real world time (but then I am basing it on accurate power and weight).
Training for long climbs is one thing that I find a turbo actually better for than riding outside, when you haven't got anywhere close that you can maintain an hour of consistent power.
High resistance, low cadence isn't something I do on the turbo because it is something I generally avoid while riding (until the hill hits about 12%+, and there's not that many of those around that go on for several km). If I was riding somewhere with lots of those climbs, I'd change my gearing.
Posts
Let's see who makes it past the first day.
Not sure how you'd check for digital cheating though.
I am not sure. You have no chance.
- @ddraver
I agree there could be qualifiers in June on Zwift (or other platform) to put together a few non PRO-teams
Whether they meet your definition of a *bike* race though, fair enough and I mostly agree. Having done quite a bit of Zwift riding this week, it certainly feels like a real race insofar as you want to win and it's damn hard! Obviously it misses some of the key elements of proper bike racing, so it is only a substitute for riding outdoors, but beggars and choosers etc.
I think there is scope to do something reasonably entertaining on Zwift, myself. If they got the coverage right, I'd watch just for the novelty factor to begin with.
A lot of the pros and teams are doing group rides on Zwift at the moment (like the sportives they sometimes do in real life), where you can ride around and do a bit of Q&A with them. So many of them are probably already set up for it.
Wilier Cento Uno SR/Wilier Mortirolo/Specialized Roubaix Comp/Kona Hei Hei/Calibre Bossnut
I am not sure. You have no chance.
Wilier Cento Uno SR/Wilier Mortirolo/Specialized Roubaix Comp/Kona Hei Hei/Calibre Bossnut
A platform designed for overweight dentists isn't a great environment to truly test the best riders in the world.
I'm not overweight or a dentist and I use it...
Or do you just enjoy insulting a couple of hundred thousand people?
There's no need to be a complete Tool.
Zwift could easily create a route that included say the mega pretzel plus the Alpe - that would be selective.
Also don't expect the same guys that win IRL to win in a virtual world.
Velon are going to try it next month. A mini Tour de Suisse. Five stages, each stage about and hour long. Three riders per team.
https://www.velon.cc/news/2020/3/26/worlds-best-professional-teams-gear-up-for-the-digital-swiss-5
Lappartient has probably got the UCI lawyers trying to kill it.
Dunno how Rouvy copes with drafting and all that.
I would probably look at 6 time trials, 3 flat (maybe one as TTT) and 3 up a mountain. 6 stages on varied terrain of about 100 km and 6 mountain stages of maybe 60-80 km each.
Nice to see another platform try something, the virtual world is more than just Zwift
It's also clear from looking at the race schedule on Zwift that the vast majority are run on those same largely flat routes with the odd short hill on them. Very few go up the Epic KOM, and even fewer go up the Alpe. Given that Zwift clearly have the data that shows the routes people use most often, and keep producing the same kind of flat courses, it's not exactly a great leap to suggest that most riders want flat courses rather than Alpine climbs.
https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/de-gendt-pulled-from-zwift-race-for-going-too-fast/
I am not sure. You have no chance.
The biggest obstacle to hitting your power interval PBs indoors compared to outdoors is lack of heat adaption (which results in higher heartrate indoors towards your threshold power), along with not enough air movement from fans and not enough water.
2020 Voodoo Marasa
2017 Cube Attain GTC Pro Disc 2016
2016 Voodoo Wazoo
My wheel-on KK Rock n Roll semi smart gave me a 60W advantage over the Neo 2T. On road testing v virtual same routes says the Neo was fairly accurate. Quicker in fact due to lack of concern about blind corners/junctions and potholes.
I am not sure. You have no chance.
Will it be any good and will it work ? Guess we will find out
Training for long climbs is one thing that I find a turbo actually better for than riding outside, when you haven't got anywhere close that you can maintain an hour of consistent power.
High resistance, low cadence isn't something I do on the turbo because it is something I generally avoid while riding (until the hill hits about 12%+, and there's not that many of those around that go on for several km). If I was riding somewhere with lots of those climbs, I'd change my gearing.