LEAVE the Conservative Party and save your country!
Comments
-
I don't think so or it would have come out earlier. He just wants to have a crack at making a new king and is on the campaign trail. Not sure which king though.rick_chasey said:
Is it not more basic? “ I woz right everyone else is wrong?”TheBigBean said:Cummings seems keen to be thought of as a kingmaker.
0 -
Well Gove was the guy who originally brought him into the Tory party and gave him a chance.TheBigBean said:
I don't think so or it would have come out earlier. He just wants to have a crack at making a new king and is on the campaign trail. Not sure which king though.rick_chasey said:
Is it not more basic? “ I woz right everyone else is wrong?”TheBigBean said:Cummings seems keen to be thought of as a kingmaker.
0 -
Isn't his wife the awful daily mail columnist?0
-
For clarity,shirley_basso said:Isn't his wife the awful daily mail columnist?
Is that a columnist at the awful daily mail?
Or an awful columnist at the daily mail?0 -
Both. She was awful when she was at The Times too.morstar said:
For clarity,shirley_basso said:Isn't his wife the awful daily mail columnist?
Is that a columnist at the awful daily mail?
Or an awful columnist at the daily mail?0 -
Well rumour is Gove was entertaining a mistress in his grace & favour flat so that status may change.shirley_basso said:Isn't his wife the awful daily mail columnist?
0 -
Anyone commented yet on Williamson’s comment about the ‘chilling effect’ of cancel culture in universities?
Always the fireplace salesman...0 -
I feel like if he succeeded on getting Gove into number 10 it would prove he can get brits to vote for anything.rick_chasey said:
Well Gove was the guy who originally brought him into the Tory party and gave him a chance.TheBigBean said:
I don't think so or it would have come out earlier. He just wants to have a crack at making a new king and is on the campaign trail. Not sure which king though.rick_chasey said:
Is it not more basic? “ I woz right everyone else is wrong?”TheBigBean said:Cummings seems keen to be thought of as a kingmaker.
(obviously I'm aware he wouldn't actually need to win a general election for that to happen)
0 -
How do I vote for Gove to be Conservative leader?0
-
-
The ultimate in levelling down.kingstongraham said:How do I vote for Gove to be Conservative leader?
I think they are capable without external help though.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Surely the key test of any leader is if they can look less awkward than Milliban eating a bacon sandwich. My money is not on Gove in this contest. But this is just a hunch.2
-
Aaahahahahaha tell me countryside people aren’t c unts 💀💀💀-2 -
If Cummings wants to be king maker he wouldn’t be burning all bridgesTheBigBean said:
I don't think so or it would have come out earlier. He just wants to have a crack at making a new king and is on the campaign trail. Not sure which king though.rick_chasey said:
Is it not more basic? “ I woz right everyone else is wrong?”TheBigBean said:Cummings seems keen to be thought of as a kingmaker.
0 -
Why?rick_chasey said:
Aaahahahahaha tell me countryside people aren’t c unts 💀💀💀1 -
-
Why on earth would you want the countryside to be full of new builds?
Mind you, 400,000 homes isn't much if you spread it across the whole of UK. 40 new homes in each parish.0 -
-
Shout out to the easily offended flagger ✌🏻
(Sometimes swearing is for exaggerated affect - relax lol )-1 -
It's all on greenbelt land. Developers are creaming themselves as it's a lot cheaper then developing on brownfield sites.rick_chasey said:“Threat of new homes” come on mate, work that one out yourself.
They are proposing 5,000 new homes on greenbelt west of Coventry based on dodgy ONS figures. They are counting students in, but not out again.
I would not have so much of an issue if it was affordable homes but it will be a raft of 6-700k homes with 'affordable' housing at 350k-ish.0 -
lol what's the actual threat of new homes for people in the countryside?
Think the logic through there.0 -
Is the wider infrastructure in place?
Often not.
0 -
Fair enough. What do you class as rural though? There's only a thin slither of land between Coventry and Birmingham now. This ruling means that it's all fair game now.rick_chasey said:lol what's the actual threat of new homes for people in the countryside?
Think the logic through there.
I'm sure the people who live in this gap would probably class it as rural.0 -
Yep, I agree and it is a point Theresa May has made, an exodus from the Cities to wreck the Countryside. It's also been exaggerated now by Covid.skyblueamateur said:
It's all on greenbelt land. Developers are creaming themselves as it's a lot cheaper then developing on brownfield sites.rick_chasey said:“Threat of new homes” come on mate, work that one out yourself.
They are proposing 5,000 new homes on greenbelt west of Coventry based on dodgy ONS figures. They are counting students in, but not out again.
I would not have so much of an issue if it was affordable homes but it will be a raft of 6-700k homes with 'affordable' housing at 350k-ish.
All these developers do is knock up little $h1t boxes with no gardens.
I'm guessing the places being developed won't be near the Cameron's of this world.2 -
Yes but why is it a good idea and why is it surprising that people don't want them in the countryside?rick_chasey said:Cheap innit.
0 -
If anything, you're marking yourself out to be one by giving it so little thought.rick_chasey said:
Aaahahahahaha tell me countryside people aren’t c unts 💀💀💀1 -
No idea if it's a good idea. I just think the idea that seeing new homes near where you live as a "threat" is four letter word behaviour.shirley_basso said:
Yes but why is it a good idea and why is it surprising that people don't want them in the countryside?rick_chasey said:Cheap innit.
0 -
Why not just build some flats over London's parks? If you did it well, you could even include some space for sport on one of the levels.rick_chasey said:lol what's the actual threat of new homes for people in the countryside?
Think the logic through there.
1 -
But it was the Times who said it was a threat, not people in the countryside.rick_chasey said:
No idea if it's a good idea. I just think the idea that seeing new homes near where you live as a "threat" is four letter word behaviour.shirley_basso said:
Yes but why is it a good idea and why is it surprising that people don't want them in the countryside?rick_chasey said:Cheap innit.
Also - why would it not be a threat? Just because you like living in a town, people who enjoy rural life in countryside may see view the building of new homes as a threat to their way of life. I don't see how that can be seen in a negative light, unless you are projecting your 4-letter-word behaviour onto them, for some reason?
2 -
My point ---->TheBigBean said:
Why not just build some flats over London's parks? If you did it well, you could even include some space for sport on one of the levels.rick_chasey said:lol what's the actual threat of new homes for people in the countryside?
Think the logic through there.
Your point ---->
Sure, why not build them?
What's threatening about new houses ffs?0
