Froome's Data
Comments
-
Ready for the usual process
1. Indignation
2. Hurt
3. Anger
4. 'Fanboi'
Mind you, this one is known to us all anyways0 -
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758785#p19758785]Richmond Racer 2[/url] wrote:Ready for the usual process
1. Indignation
2. Hurt
3. Anger
4. 'Fanboi'
Mind you, this one is known to us all anyways
You've forgotten
5. Thread lock0 -
-
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758751#p19758751]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:Well excuse me for earning visitation rights. And I don't like the insinuation.
Anyone would think you don't want people backing up Sky's administration?
Let's look at the facts.
11 posts, all with total negativity about Sky/Froome/Thomas.
Stupid comments about Millar et al, you haven't mentioned JTL yet or the number of times that Brailsford hasn't been implicated in a doping scandal.
Is your favourite rider Contador too?0 -
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758751#p19758751]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:Well excuse me for earning visitation rights. And I don't like the insinuation.
Anyone would think you don't want people backing up Sky's administration?
Let's look at the facts.
11 posts, all with total negativity about Sky/Froome/Thomas.
Stupid comments about Millar et al, you haven't mentioned JTL yet or the number of times that Brailsford hasn't been implicated in a doping scandal.
Is your favourite rider Contador too?
Can we have a full Scooby Doo reveal?0 -
Do you do requests? Can you do the two fax conspiracy next? That's my favourite - a bit of a rip off of the Obama birth certificate conspiracy, but fun nonetheless.[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758751#p19758751]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:Well excuse me for earning visitation rights. And I don't like the insinuation.
Anyone would think you don't want people backing up Sky's administration?Twitter: @RichN950 -
Do you do requests? Can you do the two fax conspiracy next? That's my favourite - a bit of a rip off of the Obama birth certificate conspiracy, but fun nonetheless.[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758751#p19758751]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:Well excuse me for earning visitation rights. And I don't like the insinuation.
Anyone would think you don't want people backing up Sky's administration?
Maybe Leinders too forgetting that Sky hired him 18 months before a word was said about him being involved in doping.0 -
All negative about Sky? No negativity here! I think you're reading me all wrong[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758751#p19758751]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:Well excuse me for earning visitation rights. And I don't like the insinuation.
Anyone would think you don't want people backing up Sky's administration?
Let's look at the facts.
11 posts, all with total negativity about Sky/Froome/Thomas.
Stupid comments about Millar et al, you haven't mentioned JTL yet or the number of times that Brailsford hasn't been implicated in a doping scandal.
Is your favourite rider Contador too?
Contador is certainly not my favourite rider, he can only win within delivery range of his steak dealer. I only support riders who've never failed a test - not like, say, Valverde, Basso or Rasmussen.Supporter of Sky, transparency and clean cycling. Opponent of pseudoscience.
The greatest clean cycling performance ever http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eiN2vfGKhk0 -
Can we just ban him/her already?0
-
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758906#p19758906]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:
All negative about Sky? No negativity here! I think you're reading me all wrong[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758751#p19758751]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:Well excuse me for earning visitation rights. And I don't like the insinuation.
Anyone would think you don't want people backing up Sky's administration?
Let's look at the facts.
11 posts, all with total negativity about Sky/Froome/Thomas.
Stupid comments about Millar et al, you haven't mentioned JTL yet or the number of times that Brailsford hasn't been implicated in a doping scandal.
Is your favourite rider Contador too?
Contador is certainly not my favourite rider, he can only win within delivery range of his steak dealer. I only support riders who've never failed a test - not like, say, Valverde, Basso or Rasmussen.
We can only go by what's been posted under your name. Has The Other Place become too much?0 -
Wow, hello to you too.Can we just ban him/her already?Supporter of Sky, transparency and clean cycling. Opponent of pseudoscience.
The greatest clean cycling performance ever http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eiN2vfGKhk0 -
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758929#p19758929]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:
Wow, hello to you too.Can we just ban him/her already?
Anti Sky trolling is very boring, and there is a place to discuss that with likeminded friends already.0 -
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758929#p19758929]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:
Wow, hello to you too.Can we just ban him/her already?
Anti Sky trolling is very boring, and there is a place to discuss that with likeminded friends already.
I imagine it's bit like with yeast in fermentation: eventually the mix becomes so toxic that the yeast organisms effectively start choking on their own excretion and the process grinds to a halt. Or perhaps more like the slowly depleting oxygen levels in a small pond as a result of an algal bloom. Something like that… On that basis, you can't blame someone for wanting to get the hell out for a breather.0 -
It could be worse. He's not banging on about how Brailsford speaks like a supermarket regional manager, his results are hyped by a gravy train press and swallowed as gopel by this forum of fanbois. That really would be trolling....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0
-
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19758929#p19758929]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:
Wow, hello to you too.Can we just ban him/her already?
Anti Sky trolling is very boring, and there is a place to discuss that with likeminded friends already.
I imagine it's bit like with yeast in fermentation: eventually the mix becomes so toxic that the yeast organisms effectively start choking on their own excretion and the process grinds to a halt. Or perhaps more like the slowly depleting oxygen levels in a small pond as a result of an algal bloom. Something like that… On that basis, you can't blame someone for wanting to get the hell out for a breather.
True, true. If only for a very very brief respite0 -
Very true. Everyone knows that Brailsford speaks gospel. I mean individual pillows and hand wash? Genius.It could be worse. He's not banging on about how Brailsford speaks like a supermarket regional manager, his results are hyped by a gravy train press and swallowed as gopel by this forum of fanbois. That really would be trolling.Supporter of Sky, transparency and clean cycling. Opponent of pseudoscience.
The greatest clean cycling performance ever http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eiN2vfGKhk0 -
He speaks more like a management consultant, I think. That's a fair point, but knocking him for his results is a bit odd. A bit like having a go at Michael Jackson for Thriller, probably not the prime avenue for criticism.It could be worse. He's not banging on about how Brailsford speaks like a supermarket regional manager, his results are hyped by a gravy train press and swallowed as gopel by this forum of fanbois. That really would be trolling.Twitter: @RichN950 -
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19759000#p19759000]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:
Very true. Everyone knows that Brailsford speaks gospel. I mean individual pillows and hand wash? Genius.It could be worse. He's not banging on about how Brailsford speaks like a supermarket regional manager, his results are hyped by a gravy train press and swallowed as gopel by this forum of fanbois. That really would be trolling.
He managed just over an hour before it became too much.
Here's a little game for you to play whilst you're allowed out. Spot the difference.0 -
Disappointing to see this forum mirror the Clinic in it's response to a non consensus viewpoint.
We are better than that.
I don't know who he is there, but give the bloke a chance.
Engage if one feels the need to try and re-educate. If not, leave him and his opinion be and allow boredom to do it's thing."Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
On one hand I agree with you. I would welcome sensible intelligent debate on the subject.[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19759026#p19759026]Blazing Saddles[/url] wrote:Disappointing to see this forum mirror the Clinic in it's response to a non consensus viewpoint.
We are better than that.
I don't know who he is there, but give the bloke a chance.
Engage if one feels the need to try and re-educate. If not, leave him and his opinion be and allow boredom to do it's thing.
On the other hand, however, when someone mentions Nutella (the identifying call of the Asylum) within their first half dozen posts, you know it won't end well.Twitter: @RichN950 -
There's a difference?[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19759000#p19759000]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:
Very true. Everyone knows that Brailsford speaks gospel. I mean individual pillows and hand wash? Genius.It could be worse. He's not banging on about how Brailsford speaks like a supermarket regional manager, his results are hyped by a gravy train press and swallowed as gopel by this forum of fanbois. That really would be trolling.
He managed just over an hour before it became too much.
Here's a little game for you to play whilst you're allowed out. Spot the difference.Supporter of Sky, transparency and clean cycling. Opponent of pseudoscience.
The greatest clean cycling performance ever http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eiN2vfGKhk0 -
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19759034#p19759034]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:
There's a difference?[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19759000#p19759000]Hercules Rockefeller[/url] wrote:
Very true. Everyone knows that Brailsford speaks gospel. I mean individual pillows and hand wash? Genius.It could be worse. He's not banging on about how Brailsford speaks like a supermarket regional manager, his results are hyped by a gravy train press and swallowed as gopel by this forum of fanbois. That really would be trolling.
He managed just over an hour before it became too much.
Here's a little game for you to play whilst you're allowed out. Spot the difference.
Just the hat and the blanket.0 -
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19759026#p19759026]Blazing Saddles[/url] wrote:Disappointing to see this forum mirror the Clinic in it's response to a non consensus viewpoint.
We are better than that.
I don't know who he is there, but give the bloke a chance.
Engage if one feels the need to try and re-educate. If not, leave him and his opinion be and allow boredom to do it's thing.
Just clocked your new signature, Saddles
0 -
He speaks more like a management consultant, I think. That's a fair point, but knocking him for his results is a bit odd. A bit like having a go at Michael Jackson for Thriller, probably not the prime avenue for criticism.It could be worse. He's not banging on about how Brailsford speaks like a supermarket regional manager, his results are hyped by a gravy train press and swallowed as gopel by this forum of fanbois. That really would be trolling.
A management consultant specialising in just-in-time grocery supplies perhaps. Regarding results, I think they're mediocre (catastrophic in 2014) without Froome, a rider who didn't fit his David Brent-esque 'rider curve' and he wanted to ditch let's not forget. You could even argue that Froome succeeded in 2013 despite Kerrison delivering a knackered support squad. Wiggo's 2012 is the exception. Truly a brilliant deployment of blind force: like surrounding Messi with a team of Savages. But even here there are massive caveats. Brailsford's blind loyalty to, or fear of, this Diva almost certainly cost his team the 2011 Vuelta.
Porte won a few chippers and Stannard Thomas and Swift are now monument threats. Granted.
I think his results massively flatter his abilities and am allergic to the virus of management consultancy infecting the last authentic sport on earth....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
^Jesus Christ, you dont believe in saying something once, if you can say it a hundred times
Anyone would think Brailford had not stamped your 2-1 offer, or something0 -
[url=http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=19759059#p19759059]Richmond Racer 2[/url] wrote:^Jesus Christ, you dont believe in saying something once, if you can say it a hundred times
Anyone would think Brailford had not stamped your 2-1 offer, or something
Rich still pretends he's God's gift. I disagree. At least I didn't bang on again about preferring some reliable mountain donkeys over the Yates brothers....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
Cycling is an authentic sport?
I ve seen $5 Rolexes with more authenticity...
The pointy end of a serious GT or monument is as close to true sport as we have left, all other games having being transformed into a circus for one reason or another....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
Cycling is an authentic sport?
I ve seen $5 Rolexes with more authenticity...
The pointy end of a serious GT or monument is as close to true sport as we have left, all other games having being transformed into a circus for one reason or another.
Literally the business end.“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0
