Astana
Comments
-
0
-
I'm sure it won't last... they'll have been kicked out by the start of next season."Unfortunately these days a lot of people don’t understand the real quality of a bike" Ernesto Colnago0
-
I was wondering if they had thought "fuck it, let's go out all guns blazing" when the rumours appeared that the UCI was going to revoke their World Tour licence.
That's not fair though because they've really made the racing enjoyable for me. Fans complain if there's a lot of action and also if the racing is boring...
It is amazing how strong the Giro squad is when you consider there's no Nibali, Fuglsang or Westra.0 -
Nibali seemed to cruise a lot of the stages in the TdF last year. Now Astana is attacking like there is no tomorrow in a 3 week race. Team Sky and SaxTin riders are dropping off towards the finish in a natural sort of way...
I guess that if their license is revoked, there will be a scrum to sign up their top riders (who won't be content to ride Pro Conti races only and hope for a wildcard) and there are plenty of them.
It would be quite a move if it happened prior to the TdF.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0 -
I don't see anything too special about what they re doing. The Mountain train has been a standard tactic for time immemorial - the cycling equivalent of playing 4-4-2 - I like what they re doing by treating it more like a modern sprint team and swarming to the front later on.
It's not like Astana have anything else on their racing horizons than GTs either so they ve built a squad of 2 GT teams. [**Frenchie hyperbole alert**] if they were sky we'd be saying how boring and formulaic they are but they re not british so we give them a pass [/**Frenchie hyperbole alert**]We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
-
It's impressive. That's about all you can say about it really.
They don't have any option but to chuck everything at it though. Aru knows he needs to use every climb he can to try and put time in Contador and Porte.0 -
ddraver wrote:I don't see anything too special about what they re doing. The Mountain train has been a standard tactic for time immemorial - the cycling equivalent of playing 4-4-2 - I like what they re doing by treating it more like a modern sprint team and swarming to the front later on.
It's not like Astana have anything else on their racing horizons than GTs either so they ve built a squad of 2 GT teams. [**Frenchie hyperbole alert**] if they were sky we'd be saying how boring and formulaic they are but they re not british so we give them a pass [/**Frenchie hyperbole alert**]
It's all a bit USPS-like for my tastes.0 -
Consistently stronger than every other team by a distance. If it looks like a turd and smells like a turd...0
-
SheffSimon wrote:ddraver wrote:I don't see anything too special about what they re doing. The Mountain train has been a standard tactic for time immemorial - the cycling equivalent of playing 4-4-2 - I like what they re doing by treating it more like a modern sprint team and swarming to the front later on.
It's not like Astana have anything else on their racing horizons than GTs either so they ve built a squad of 2 GT teams. [**Frenchie hyperbole alert**] if they were sky we'd be saying how boring and formulaic they are but they re not british so we give them a pass [/**Frenchie hyperbole alert**]
It's all a bit USPS-like for my tastes.
So because Gatlin won a 100m by putting one foot in front of the other does it follow therefore that Usain Bolt is doping because he also runs 100m races putting one foot in front of the other?
I assume that's what you mean, the tactic is way, way older than USPSWe're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
ddraver wrote:I don't see anything too special about what they re doing. The Mountain train has been a standard tactic for time immemorial - the cycling equivalent of playing 4-4-2 - I like what they re doing by treating it more like a modern sprint team and swarming to the front later on.
It's not like Astana have anything else on their racing horizons than GTs either so they ve built a squad of 2 GT teams. [**Frenchie hyperbole alert**] if they were sky we'd be saying how boring and formulaic they are but they re not british so we give them a pass [/**Frenchie hyperbole alert**]
And despite all this their train hasn't been particularly effective at dropping contenders as other trains have been, it's served more to soften them up. The damage (to Uran in particular) has been done by attacks from Aru and Contador.
(If I had been Contador I would have deliberately lost the jersey to Aru and let them do the work all week)Twitter: @RichN950 -
ddraver wrote:SheffSimon wrote:ddraver wrote:I don't see anything too special about what they re doing. The Mountain train has been a standard tactic for time immemorial - the cycling equivalent of playing 4-4-2 - I like what they re doing by treating it more like a modern sprint team and swarming to the front later on.
It's not like Astana have anything else on their racing horizons than GTs either so they ve built a squad of 2 GT teams. [**Frenchie hyperbole alert**] if they were sky we'd be saying how boring and formulaic they are but they re not british so we give them a pass [/**Frenchie hyperbole alert**]
It's all a bit USPS-like for my tastes.
So because Gatlin won a 100m by putting one foot in front of the other does it follow therefore that Usain Bolt is doping because he also runs 100m races putting one foot in front of the other?
I assume that's what you mean, the tactic is way, way older than USPS
Does anyone here think that Bolt isn't doping? Or any of the Jamaican sprint team?0 -
-
Paolo Tiralongo did a two week GC ride back when the Ryder won. Rode like a lunatic then parked up in the third week.
it is eye brow raising but I expect them to fade. then again its a quite week coming up before the TT and they can sit in the wheels while saxo controls the time gaps. Maybe recover for the final week. Even if they show in the mountains its not bonafide proof.
they do seem above the rest, mind you sky have been hiding except Kiryrenka."If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm0 -
RichN95 wrote:ddraver wrote:I don't see anything too special about what they re doing. The Mountain train has been a standard tactic for time immemorial - the cycling equivalent of playing 4-4-2 - I like what they re doing by treating it more like a modern sprint team and swarming to the front later on.
It's not like Astana have anything else on their racing horizons than GTs either so they ve built a squad of 2 GT teams. [**Frenchie hyperbole alert**] if they were sky we'd be saying how boring and formulaic they are but they re not british so we give them a pass [/**Frenchie hyperbole alert**]
And despite all this their train hasn't been particularly effective at dropping contenders as other trains have been, it's served more to soften them up. The damage (to Uran in particular) has been done by attacks from Aru and Contador.)
Seconded, I think it's been to a particular plan and they'll be very quiet this week.RichN95 wrote:If I had been Contador I would have deliberately lost the jersey to Aru and let them do the work all week
Now THAT would have been bold. And would Stumpy Oleg McNolegs let him do it?It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0 -
Salsiccia1 wrote:RichN95 wrote:If I had been Contador I would have deliberately lost the jersey to Aru and let them do the work all week
Now THAT would have been bold. And would Stumpy Oleg McNolegs let him do it?
Armstrong would have been happy to lose it (especially to a local). For all his faults, he was expectional at piecing together a GT.Twitter: @RichN950 -
Correlation is not causation.0
-
ddraver wrote:I don't see anything too special about what they re doing. The Mountain train has been a standard tactic for time immemorial - the cycling equivalent of playing 4-4-2 - I like what they re doing by treating it more like a modern sprint team and swarming to the front later on.
It's not like Astana have anything else on their racing horizons than GTs either so they ve built a squad of 2 GT teams. [**Frenchie hyperbole alert**] if they were sky we'd be saying how boring and formulaic they are but they re not british so we give them a pass [/**Frenchie hyperbole alert**]
In fairness, they're going about it in a more exciting style than Sky would0 -
Skyradar operators are talking down Astana's performance so that when Porte cruises to victory on the back of a dominant TT, 'he only beat a developing 24 year-old Aru and a dislocated Contador'....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0
-
ddraver wrote:SheffSimon wrote:ddraver wrote:I don't see anything too special about what they re doing. The Mountain train has been a standard tactic for time immemorial - the cycling equivalent of playing 4-4-2 - I like what they re doing by treating it more like a modern sprint team and swarming to the front later on.
It's not like Astana have anything else on their racing horizons than GTs either so they ve built a squad of 2 GT teams. [**Frenchie hyperbole alert**] if they were sky we'd be saying how boring and formulaic they are but they re not british so we give them a pass [/**Frenchie hyperbole alert**]
It's all a bit USPS-like for my tastes.
So because Gatlin won a 100m by putting one foot in front of the other does it follow therefore that Usain Bolt is doping because he also runs 100m races putting one foot in front of the other?
I assume that's what you mean, the tactic is way, way older than USPS
Not a tactic I noticed watching the tour through the 80's...not saying it didn't happen but I didn't notice it happening. Unlike USPS, who seemed to have an endless supply of riders who could hammer away on the front on a climb all day long.0 -
ddraver wrote:suddenly a lot fewer* marmots around here...?!?
*thankyou King Stannis
I don't get the reference, but I've not watched last night's episode. Do we have to have a no GoT spoiler rule on the forum?0 -
TakeTheHighRoad wrote:ddraver wrote:suddenly a lot fewer* marmots around here...?!?
*thankyou King Stannis
I don't get the reference, but I've not watched last night's episode. Do we have to have a no GoT spoiler rule on the forum?
However, in the latest episode Stannis did raise a marmot army.Twitter: @RichN950 -
Ah fair enough.
He could do with recruiting the guy from Ventoux, with his boar and all0 -
TakeTheHighRoad wrote:ddraver wrote:suddenly a lot fewer* marmots around here...?!?
*thankyou King Stannis
I don't get the reference, but I've not watched last night's episode. Do we have to have a no GoT spoiler rule on the forum?
Ooo that reminds me, I have that to watch this evening.
Anyway a marmot is a groundhog. There's lots of them that live on the Stelvio.RichN95 wrote:He just muttered a less/fewer grammar correction.
I wasn't a big fan of Stannis until that. I'm warming to the man.RichN95 wrote:However, in the latest episode Stannis did raise a marmot army.
That better actually be true or I'll set my groundhog on you!Correlation is not causation.0