BREXIT - Is This Really Still Rumbling On? 😴

1146814691471147314742110

Comments

  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,154

    spatt77 said:

    Maybe he`s angling to get the WA ripped up?

    Would seem odd to want to do that having voted for it? Especially as nothing has changed between now and then.
    One thing seems to have changed.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    What’s that?
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,331
    The shock realisation that we might get what he voted for when it's not what he wants?
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    pblakeney said:

    The shock realisation that we might get what he voted for when it's not what he wants?

    He’ll be in good company.
  • I imagine the liar told him that he was lying to somebody else and now he has found out that the liar was lying to him about who he was lying to
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,428

    I imagine the liar told him that he was lying to somebody else and now he has found out that the liar was lying to him about who he was lying to

    What was I saying about being objective just the other day? ;)
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • Some tory mep on politico saying it was remainers that forced it on Boris. Even though remainers kept voting against it.......
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,154

    What’s that?

    He read it.
  • What’s that?

    He read it.
    No, he hasn't, someone else read it. He just read the Politico article about it and is up in arms that anyone could be stupid enough to vote for it.
  • Stevo_666 said:

    I imagine the liar told him that he was lying to somebody else and now he has found out that the liar was lying to him about who he was lying to

    What was I saying about being objective just the other day? ;)
    You don’t think that more likely than IDS read it?

    How many times has Boris been fired for lying?

    When Boris said there would be no border checks between UK and NI was he telling the truth?
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,428

    Stevo_666 said:

    I imagine the liar told him that he was lying to somebody else and now he has found out that the liar was lying to him about who he was lying to

    What was I saying about being objective just the other day? ;)
    You don’t think that more likely than IDS read it?

    How many times has Boris been fired for lying?

    When Boris said there would be no border checks between UK and NI was he telling the truth?
    I rest my case, thanks :smile:
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    I imagine the liar told him that he was lying to somebody else and now he has found out that the liar was lying to him about who he was lying to

    What was I saying about being objective just the other day? ;)
    You don’t think that more likely than IDS read it?

    How many times has Boris been fired for lying?

    When Boris said there would be no border checks between UK and NI was he telling the truth?
    I rest my case, thanks :smile:
    The amusing thing is that if you woke up tomorrow and he was leader of the Labour Party you would hate him more than me.
  • joenobody
    joenobody Posts: 563
    Stevo_666 said:


    I rest my case, thanks :smile:

    For someone who likes to call out others for not answering questions you're pretty good at not answering questions...
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,428
    joenobody said:

    Stevo_666 said:


    I rest my case, thanks :smile:

    For someone who likes to call out others for not answering questions you're pretty good at not answering questions...
    I give as good as I get.

    Out of interest, what's it got to do with you?
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • joenobody
    joenobody Posts: 563
    Stevo_666 said:


    Out of interest, what's it got to do with you?

    Not a lot, but as someone who follows this thread for the entertainment value it's just something I've noticed. And not for the first time.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,428
    joenobody said:

    Stevo_666 said:


    Out of interest, what's it got to do with you?

    Not a lot
    Quite...
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • Stevo_666 said:

    joenobody said:

    Stevo_666 said:


    Out of interest, what's it got to do with you?

    Not a lot
    Quite...
    It's a public forum and your being mean. Now answer the question..
  • joenobody
    joenobody Posts: 563
    Stevo_666 said:

    joenobody said:

    Stevo_666 said:


    Out of interest, what's it got to do with you?

    Not a lot
    Quite...
    At least I answered the question. :p

    To be fair, DHL has it right - this is a public forum. As such, if you post here you implicitly (if not explicitly, I didn't read the terms and conditions when signing up) agree that anything you post could "got to do" with anyone who reads it. I find it interesting to see that you are guilty of a number of things that you regularly call others out for. Seems you hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself.
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,428

    Stevo_666 said:

    joenobody said:

    Stevo_666 said:


    Out of interest, what's it got to do with you?

    Not a lot
    Quite...
    It's a public forum and your being mean. Now answer the question..
    Not sure why you're getting stern on behalf of SC?
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • Stevo_666 said:

    Stevo_666 said:

    joenobody said:

    Stevo_666 said:


    Out of interest, what's it got to do with you?

    Not a lot
    Quite...
    It's a public forum and your being mean. Now answer the question..
    Not sure why you're getting stern on behalf of SC?
    stern's, now there was an evening out!
  • webboo
    webboo Posts: 6,087
    There’s some classic political avoiding answering the questions going on.
  • I find it hard to believe ERG gang and boris didn't know what was in the WA. That's what they pay the negotiators and the lawyers to do, read it agree it and tell BJ what's in it and what it means.
    The number of "learned colleague's " in the government indicates they should understand the jargon.
    I really am at a loss to understand what the game plan is now?
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,331


    I really am at a loss to understand what the game plan is now?

    No deal.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pblakeney said:


    I really am at a loss to understand what the game plan is now?

    No deal.
    How does that get rid of the WA?
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,331

    pblakeney said:


    I really am at a loss to understand what the game plan is now?

    No deal.
    How does that get rid of the WA?
    You are assuming the wish for an agreement. 😉
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:


    I really am at a loss to understand what the game plan is now?

    No deal.
    How does that get rid of the WA?
    You are assuming the wish for an agreement. 😉
    Its signed.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,331

    pblakeney said:

    pblakeney said:


    I really am at a loss to understand what the game plan is now?

    No deal.
    How does that get rid of the WA?
    You are assuming the wish for an agreement. 😉
    Its signed.
    It's not all over yet though. Emphasis on all.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • I find it hard to believe ERG gang and boris didn't know what was in the WA. That's what they pay the negotiators and the lawyers to do, read it agree it and tell BJ what's in it and what it means.
    The number of "learned colleague's " in the government indicates they should understand the jargon.
    I really am at a loss to understand what the game plan is now?

    Boris knows what is int it, the rest appeared to believe him when he told them they could ignore the bits they did not like.
  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,154
    Do you think they thought that it would all be up for negotiation again as part of the trade agreement, so would disappear if there was no deal?
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,331
    21 weeks until the WA and negotiations are out of time and finished.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.