TDF-Stage 16: Carcassonne–Bagnères-de-Luchon: *Spoiler*
Comments
-
-
Rick Chasey wrote:Am I the only person here who doesn't like Rogers?
No me to, but just like celery I'm trying to like him0 -
Contador is the Greatest0 -
They went into some nice tunnels yesterday:
Sam D did a monster job for Bardet on the descent:
Contador is the Greatest0 -
Some French people's fascination with the royals (small R) is embarrassing and shows a lack of respect for their own history.
Contador is the Greatest0 -
Don't pick on little George, poor kid is only one year old and judging by the pic on BBC news last week he's already sporting a combover.Life is unfair, kill yourself or get over it.0
-
Soon they will be training him on how to take taxpayers money to spend tens of thousands on a new kitchen when the previous (tax-payers paid for) kitchen was in perfect order, whilst at the same time, dress down and slum it with the proles so that they think you are in touch with the everyday person and their struggles.Contador is the Greatest0
-
Your knocking of the Royal family is showing a lack of respect for the figurehead of the country where you have chosen to make your living.0
-
coriordan wrote:Your knocking of the Royal family is showing a lack of respect for the figurehead of the country where you have chosen to make your living.
I am English.
The puppets that get tons of land, money and palaces through no merit of their own and off the backs of hard working true contributors to this country are relics.
It is an insult on your intelligence, freedom and dignity to support them.Contador is the Greatest0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Am I the only person here who doesn't like Rogers?
Feel the similarly in the minority about Voeckler - he's a clown.0 -
frenchfighter wrote:coriordan wrote:Your knocking of the Royal family is showing a lack of respect for the figurehead of the country where you have chosen to make your living.
I am English.
The puppets that get tons of land, money and palaces through no merit of their own and off the backs of hard working true contributors to this country are relics.
It is an insult on your intelligence, freedom and dignity to support them.
You do know that the royal family costs each UK taxpayer less than £1.50 per year? The amount of money brought into the country by the royal family is significantly greater than that - like around £15 per taxpayer from tourism alone.
Of course that doesn't make their position correct - but from an economical perspective it's good business.0 -
Quick question for Frenchfighter ...
As someone with French heritage, how do you feel about 3 Frenchmen fighting for the podium in not only the biggest race of the year but 'their' race? Does it even enter your head?
I'm interested to know given your long list of 'favourites' from many other countries and different teams. I get the impression that you don't see nationality as a selling point (or barrier) to who you support but it would still be interesting to get your thoughts on this, especially with the 'fervour' we've had to endure the past few years based solely on nationality.Life is unfair, kill yourself or get over it.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Am I the only person here who doesn't like Rogers?
INRNG didn't seem such a fan either in his summary of yesterday.0 -
type:epyt wrote:Quick question for Frenchfighter ...
As someone with French heritage, how do you feel about 3 Frenchmen fighting for the podium in not only the biggest race of the year but 'their' race? Does it even enter your head?
I'm interested to know given your long list of 'favourites' from many other countries and different teams. I get the impression that you don't see nationality as a selling point (or barrier) to who you support but it would still be interesting to get your thoughts on this, especially with the 'fervour' we've had to endure the past few years based solely on nationality.
It's wonderful given it is their home Tour and the French have not performed so well at GC in this race for a long time.Contador is the Greatest0 -
nic_77 wrote:frenchfighter wrote:coriordan wrote:Your knocking of the Royal family is showing a lack of respect for the figurehead of the country where you have chosen to make your living.
I am English.
The puppets that get tons of land, money and palaces through no merit of their own and off the backs of hard working true contributors to this country are relics.
It is an insult on your intelligence, freedom and dignity to support them.
You do know that the royal family costs each UK taxpayer less than £1.50 per year? The amount of money brought into the country by the royal family is significantly greater than that - like around £15 per taxpayer from tourism alone.
Of course that doesn't make their position correct - but from an economical perspective it's good business.
Can I donate my 1.50 to a better cause? Like child poverty? 1.50 x millions adds up doesnt it - putting it in terms of cost per person is a way of trying to dupe the average person.
Read this for starters for both on the truer cost in addition to the financial benefit:
http://republic.org.uk/sites/default/fi ... ypenny.pdf
That does not even include the money that could be reaped from opening up the tens of palaces they own as tourist attractions charging entry fee like in France castles and palaces for example.
It doesn't include either what the economic benefit of the land they unfairly own (an incredible amount) would be if it was sold and used by the Government.Contador is the Greatest0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Am I the only person here who doesn't like Rogers?
Count me in, and to quote George Michael "guilty feet have got no rhythm"...Half man, Half bike0 -
To be honest I probably trust the royal family to own and run the land more than the government. What economic benefit does a one-off sale give? It has been constantly proven that the government are incapable of realising value from assets when they are up for sale, so why would the palaces be any different? I would suggest that they probably are better kept as they are and that the royals land (such as the dutchy estate and others) are kept as is to continue to generate income rather than a (measly) lump sum which would be squandered.0
-
KnightOfTheLongTights wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Am I the only person here who doesn't like Rogers?
Feel the similarly in the minority about Voeckler - he's a clown.
Wait, people on here actually like Titi? I must have missed that, but yeah, total clown.0 -
nic_77 wrote:You do know that the royal family costs each UK taxpayer less than £1.50 per year? The amount of money brought into the country by the royal family is significantly greater than that - like around £15 per taxpayer from tourism alone.
Of course that doesn't make their position correct - but from an economical perspective it's good business.
I understood that the cost of the royal family did not include the vast sums spent protecting them and arranging their various publicity stu...I mean visits around the country. I would be willing to bet that the sums they supposedly bring into the country are inflated just as their cost is deliberately underestimated. All these things are stage managed so we don't question why a family are allowed money and influence by birthright.
However, even if we did benefit economically I'd gladly pay not to have a head of state who represents unearned privilege and wealth.[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0 -
DeVlaeminck wrote:I understood that the cost of the royal family did not include the vast sums spent protecting them and arranging their various publicity stu...I mean visits around the country. I would be willing to bet that the sums they supposedly bring into the country are inflated just as their cost is deliberately underestimated. All these things are stage managed so we don't question why a family are allowed money and influence by birthright.Twitter: @RichN950
-
If anyone wants to complain about people having money and power they don't deserve, please start with politicians. They're a far more worthwhile target for any abuse you feel like dishing out.0
-
Except we voted them in. We get what we deserve in that respect.0
-
DeVlaeminck wrote:However, even if we did benefit economically I'd gladly pay not to have a head of state who represents unearned privilege and wealth.
I'm on the other side of the coin. I really like the fact that we have a Royal Family. It's one of the few things that makes me proud to feel British.0 -
coriordan wrote:Except we voted them in. We get what we deserve in that respect.
That's the biggest argument for keeping the current system. We've survived their familial far-right foibles, despite battling the master-race twice. Admittedly we're about to see a change from the majestic Big Brenda to the improvisational Whispering Grass. When King Chuck incites the tabloids against GM, or whatever anti-science campaign he's on, republicanism will have a chance.
But given we'd possibly elect President Farage in the current climate, I'm not convinced it's a smart idea in practice....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
Yellow Peril wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:Am I the only person here who doesn't like Rogers?
No me to, but just like celery I'm trying to like him
Freiburg Mick was my fave rider in 2005/6 (cost me many PTP points) but him (and Kloeden's) getting away with it has rankled since.___________________
Strava is not Zen.0 -
frenchfighter wrote:coriordan wrote:Your knocking of the Royal family is showing a lack of respect for the figurehead of the country where you have chosen to make your living.
I am English.
The puppets that get tons of land, money and palaces through no merit of their own and off the backs of hard working true contributors to this country are relics.
It is an insult on your intelligence, freedom and dignity to support them.
Go FF!___________________
Strava is not Zen.0 -
Macaloon wrote:But given we'd possibly elect President Farage in the current climate, I'm not convinced it's a smart idea in practice.
Or even worse, President Blair. The republicans should be very careful what they wish for! The Royal Family may be imperfect and heavily inbred, but the alternatives must surely be worse. The Irish system seems to work quite well, it must be said, though this seems to be an exception to the rule.0