Chris Froome cured

12346»

Comments

  • Macaloon
    Macaloon Posts: 5,545
    Stillnox wrote:
    Pross wrote:
    Stillnox wrote:
    So, how come Froome/Walsh/Brailsford have stated on numerous occasions the Bilharzia feeds on the red blood cells, effectively doing the reverse of what EPO does?

    So do the inaccuracies in Walsh's writing only apply when they can be used as evidence of a cover up?
    Perhaps you misread my post but I specifically stated Froome/Walsh/Brailsford.

    Cover up? I am talking about inconsistencies. The bilharzia feeding on red blood cells and effectively doing the reverse of what epo does is a wrong assesment of the disease. The disease that hampered a young athlete to get results, become the best stage racer of his era.

    http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/8859/ ... eason.aspx

    From being able to climb in the front group quite often this season (2011) to effectively a GT winner is explained by the clearing of the parasite which according Sky/Froome and later Walsh 'de - epoed' the guy.

    Why that lie?

    :roll:
    ...a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.
  • No_Ta_Doctor
    No_Ta_Doctor Posts: 14,651
    Stillnox wrote:
    Macaloon wrote:
    Misleading at best, so I'm calling this another lie. Grappe referred to Froome's suspected high VO2 Max. Is this what you are representing as backup for your lies?
    I dont like being called a liar by someone who seems not to know what the subject is, so you are reported.

    http://www.todayonline.com/sports/analy ... -hes-clean

    ''Grappe’s method is based on estimated Record Power Profile (PPR), which is essentially the maximum power an individual can sustain over a set period. “Froome’s PPR over two years shows no fundamental anomaly,” he wrote. “In two years, his profile has not changed.”

    The data was collected from 18 climbs at the Spanish Vuelta of 2011 and 2012, this year and last year’s Tour, the Dauphine race he won this year and the 2013 Tirreno-Adriatico.''


    So, if he know is the best stage racer in the world, his profile has not changed, what was he in the 2011 Vuelta? Is that so hard for you?

    But as "Results mean nothing, they are statistics" how do you know he wasn't already the best stage racer in the peloton when he was at Barloworld? Do you want to base your assessment of his prowess on his wattage or his results?

    You want to have your cake and eat it. Pathetic really.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format
  • Guys, I have really had enough of you lot bitching, calling each other names, then reporting each other in the hope to get someone banned... If you can't keep a discussion as such don't even start it, otherwise I'm afraid the all area of the forum will have to be revised
    left the forum March 2023
This discussion has been closed.