The Tour - stage 13 *spoiler*
Comments
-
darhlairedlord wrote:saw it didn't hear it no speakers on my work pc!
He was quote on CN (I think) saying he thought it might have been the hardest stage he has ever ridden....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
Macaloon wrote:darhlairedlord wrote:saw it didn't hear it no speakers on my work pc!
He was quote on CN (I think) saying he thought it might have been the hardest stage he has ever ridden.
He could use the ignorance excuse, but I'm sure Highroad said the same in 2009!0 -
Macaloon wrote:darhlairedlord wrote:saw it didn't hear it no speakers on my work pc!
He was quote on CN (I think) saying he thought it might have been the hardest stage he has ever ridden.
so i prob did'nt see it either, my mistakio0 -
Slim Boy Fat wrote:dish_dash wrote:What did Rogers say?
Ta... great on the fly tactical thinking by Rodgers. They further sparked up a race already on fire thanks to Belkin/OPQS and served to further emphasise Sky's relatively weak team. It's already been said, but treat the stages as classics and Sky really struggle...
GC racing is all about ebs and flows, right? Still a lot to come and today added a good amount of spice...0 -
Going back to the road captain question, an experienced one would have noted the Saxo train forming and piloted Froome to Contador's neighbourhood, deterring the move. (All assuming he had any wing-men left.)...a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0
-
tigerben wrote:How about tactically weak instead? He should have followed his instinct and gone with the Saxo break rather than hitting the radio and missing the chance. Lack of experience perhaps causing fatal hesitation?
It demonstrates a lack of confidence and self-belief rather than a lack of experience. His instinct was to go, but doubt cost him.0 -
The Mad Rapper wrote:tigerben wrote:How about tactically weak instead? He should have followed his instinct and gone with the Saxo break rather than hitting the radio and missing the chance. Lack of experience perhaps causing fatal hesitation?
It demonstrates a lack of confidence and self-belief rather than a lack of experience. His instinct was to go, but doubt cost him.
First time riding a GC as leader... and last time he used his instinct the radio told him to get back0 -
The Mad Rapper wrote:tigerben wrote:How about tactically weak instead? He should have followed his instinct and gone with the Saxo break rather than hitting the radio and missing the chance. Lack of experience perhaps causing fatal hesitation?
It demonstrates a lack of confidence and self-belief rather than a lack of experience. His instinct was to go, but doubt cost him.
You could argue that the smart thing to do was to radio for urgent reinforcements rather than chase Cav in a full sprint....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
Macaloon wrote:The Mad Rapper wrote:tigerben wrote:How about tactically weak instead? He should have followed his instinct and gone with the Saxo break rather than hitting the radio and missing the chance. Lack of experience perhaps causing fatal hesitation?
It demonstrates a lack of confidence and self-belief rather than a lack of experience. His instinct was to go, but doubt cost him.
You could argue that the smart thing to do was to radio for urgent reinforcements rather than chase Cav in a full sprint.0 -
Macaloon wrote:The Mad Rapper wrote:tigerben wrote:How about tactically weak instead? He should have followed his instinct and gone with the Saxo break rather than hitting the radio and missing the chance. Lack of experience perhaps causing fatal hesitation?
It demonstrates a lack of confidence and self-belief rather than a lack of experience. His instinct was to go, but doubt cost him.
You could argue that the smart thing to do was to radio for urgent reinforcements rather than chase Cav in a full sprint.
That he had to use the radio to call up reinforcements already shows a degree of weakness in the team. And in that wind once you lost the wheel they were gone... see Valverde. If anything the rest of Sky should have been there with him, watching the moves and covering for him (Stannard did work his butt off). It's never been a Sky strong point and even more so today...0 -
Macaloon wrote:You could argue that the smart thing to do was to radio for urgent reinforcements rather than chase Cav in a full sprint.
He didn't have the time. If Cav had to sprint to get on then there was no way Froome could get anyone else up. He should have just went. Besides, he's not Wiggins, he doesn't need to be surrounded by his Team; which is handy because his Team seem utter crap this year.0 -
Macaloon wrote:Going back to the road captain question, an experienced one would have noted the Saxo train forming and piloted Froome to Contador's neighbourhood, deterring the move. (All assuming he had any wing-men left.)
Hi (supposed to be working now, but keep coming back to this.......)
That's an interesting point to try (thank you) to help me get my head around this Road Captain and Team Captain thing. If you'll be even more patient, why aren't Team Captains also Road Captains (since they're good enough to be team captain). What is the division of responsibilities? Let's pretend I'm Contador or Froome, big name top rider. Why do I also have a Road Captain?
I'm not arguing, I am trying to understand even more; and that's one of the things I love about Pro Cycling, there's always more to learn.
Thanks in advance.0 -
Lichtblick wrote:Hi (supposed to be working now, but keep coming back to this.......)
That's an interesting point to try (thank you) to help me get my head around this Road Captain and Team Captain thing. If you'll be even more patient, why aren't Team Captains also Road Captains (since they're good enough to be team captain). What is the division of responsibilities? Let's pretend I'm Contador or Froome, big name top rider. Why do I also have a Road Captain?
I'm not arguing, I am trying to understand even more; and that's one of the things I love about Pro Cycling, there's always more to learn.
Thanks in advance.
+1. I approve of this post.0 -
dish_dash wrote:The Mad Rapper wrote:First time riding a GC as leader... and last time he used his instinct the radio told him to get back
This is about Froome, right? IIRC he was leader in last year's Vuelta.
just checked on Google.
He was.0 -
Lichtblick wrote:Macaloon wrote:Going back to the road captain question, an experienced one would have noted the Saxo train forming and piloted Froome to Contador's neighbourhood, deterring the move. (All assuming he had any wing-men left.)
Hi (supposed to be working now, but keep coming back to this.......)
That's an interesting point to try (thank you) to help me get my head around this Road Captain and Team Captain thing. If you'll be even more patient, why aren't Team Captains also Road Captains (since they're good enough to be team captain). What is the division of responsibilities? Let's pretend I'm Contador or Froome, big name top rider. Why do I also have a Road Captain?
I'm not arguing, I am trying to understand even more; and that's one of the things I love about Pro Cycling, there's always more to learn.
Thanks in advance.
If you're doing it right it can be a very demanding job: managing a group of 9, deciding when to ride, when not, worrying how to keep leader near the front. You'd rather not burn GC leader's enegry with this stuff leaving him to relax and shelter as much as possible....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
Macaloon wrote:The Mad Rapper wrote:tigerben wrote:How about tactically weak instead? He should have followed his instinct and gone with the Saxo break rather than hitting the radio and missing the chance. Lack of experience perhaps causing fatal hesitation?
It demonstrates a lack of confidence and self-belief rather than a lack of experience. His instinct was to go, but doubt cost him.
You could argue that the smart thing to do was to radio for urgent reinforcements rather than chase Cav in a full sprint.
Mmmm, Unless he was on there ordering up a Chinese, I'd say that the result suggests otherwise.
Too far back in that bunch for too long and paid the price. Given his strength, he should have committed.
He might have saved a few watts today, but his team didn't. All at a cost of 69 seconds."Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
Lichtblick wrote:Macaloon wrote:Going back to the road captain question, an experienced one would have noted the Saxo train forming and piloted Froome to Contador's neighbourhood, deterring the move. (All assuming he had any wing-men left.)
Hi (supposed to be working now, but keep coming back to this.......)
That's an interesting point to try (thank you) to help me get my head around this Road Captain and Team Captain thing. If you'll be even more patient, why aren't Team Captains also Road Captains (since they're good enough to be team captain). What is the division of responsibilities? Let's pretend I'm Contador or Froome, big name top rider. Why do I also have a Road Captain?
I'm not arguing, I am trying to understand even more; and that's one of the things I love about Pro Cycling, there's always more to learn.
Thanks in advance.0 -
Blazing Saddles wrote:Mmmm, Unless he was on there ordering up a Chinese, I'd say that the result suggests otherwise.
Too far back in that bunch for too long and paid the price. Given his strength, he should have committed.
He might have saved a few watts today, but his team didn't. All at a cost of 69 seconds.
Cav said he sprinted faster to catch the group than in the final sprint. I just think that Froome tried to catch but fairly quickly concluded it was pointless. He then got on the radio for some team-mates to limit the damage. But I agree the mistake was allowing Saxo the opportunity to pull a surprise attack in the first place....a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.0 -
Lichtblick wrote:dish_dash wrote:The Mad Rapper wrote:First time riding a GC as leader... and last time he used his instinct the radio told him to get back
This is about Froome, right? IIRC he was leader in last year's Vuelta.
just checked on Google.
He was.
Vuelta's not a proper GC though right I stand corrected. Second time riding a GC as leader, and first time at the big one!0 -
Since this appears to be my 1,000th post here, I'd better make it a good one.
I think that whatever people may or may not think about AC and his team and all back history, he/they did a great job today in enlivening this year's Tour de France. Everyone (yeah, everyone) expected today to be a so-so transition stage across to the mountains. Instead, we had a really gripping race, thanks to AC and Saxo - clearly well planned.
I've changed my avatar as a salute.
I'm also glad to be tolerated here: the best anyone can hope for on a busy knowledgeable forum like this. Thanks, guys. I take it that my questions aren't that stupid, and that my commentating remarks aren't that stupid either. I take both as a compliment, since I've only been following this terrific sport for 10 years.
My bike's had a service tune-up, so I'm going out now in what remains of the sunshine. Too many hours at the computer already.
Cheers - and I say that cheerfully. On with the Tour and more excitement to come!0 -
RichN95 wrote:frisbee wrote:Bit of a pointless stage to attack Froome on, they've expended a huge amount of energy and were lucky that they actually gained 70 seconds.
Vuelta last year?0 -
afx237vi wrote:RichN95 wrote:frisbee wrote:Bit of a pointless stage to attack Froome on, they've expended a huge amount of energy and were lucky that they actually gained 70 seconds.
Vuelta last year?
On form though ?Gasping - but somehow still alive !0 -
Incidentally, one of the Saxo staff was interviewed on Danish TV. He'd been out scouting the road ahead, 20km out, with a wind measuring device.Warning No formatter is installed for the format0
-
Alan A wrote:Flat profile, dead cert bunch sprint sort of day. Cav won fair and square.
No doping chat.
35 pages before 6pm
What does this do to Iain's graphs & pie charts?
No doping chat????
Cant have that. What about Saxo having 5 or 6 guys up at the front, on every flat stage, matching the sprint trains, including this one?????0 -
mike6 wrote:Alan A wrote:Flat profile, dead cert bunch sprint sort of day. Cav won fair and square.
No doping chat.
35 pages before 6pm
What does this do to Iain's graphs & pie charts?
No doping chat????
Cant have that. What about Saxo having 5 or 6 guys up at the front, on every flat stage, matching the sprint trains, including this one?????
I know it's hard, but try not to ruin the mood.
There's actually some half decent stuff about race tactics n' all."Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
Moray Gub wrote:afx237vi wrote:RichN95 wrote:frisbee wrote:Bit of a pointless stage to attack Froome on, they've expended a huge amount of energy and were lucky that they actually gained 70 seconds.
Vuelta last year?
On form though ?
Everyone is on form until they start losing time
FWIW, I don't think he's as bulletproof as Wiggins was last year, and he might have another stressful day tomorrow, but none of the the main contenders will have enough to match him on the Ventoux.0 -
No tA Doctor wrote:Incidentally, one of the Saxo staff was interviewed on Danish TV. He'd been out scouting the road ahead, 20km out, with a wind measuring device.
A few of the teams do that - I remember it being mentioned in one of the OGE backstage pass vids on youtube.0 -
afx237vi wrote:Moray Gub wrote:afx237vi wrote:RichN95 wrote:frisbee wrote:Bit of a pointless stage to attack Froome on, they've expended a huge amount of energy and were lucky that they actually gained 70 seconds.
Vuelta last year?
On form though ?
Everyone is on form until they start losing time
FWIW, I don't think he's as bulletproof as Wiggins was last year, and he might have another stressful day tomorrow, but none of the the main contenders will have enough to match him on the Ventoux.
Still think that there is a sting in the tail in this race could go to the last Saturday.Gasping - but somehow still alive !0