Highest Average for a 50+ mile ride

2

Comments

  • Grill
    Grill Posts: 5,610
    Indeed it does. Wattage is the best quantifier, but not available to everyone.
    English Cycles V3 | Cervelo P5 | Cervelo T4 | Trek Domane Koppenberg
  • danowat
    danowat Posts: 2,877
    jane90 wrote:
    Hi all, a newbie question if you don't mind (from a cycling newbie) - how meaningful is a comparison of average speeds?

    It isn't, it's pure willy-waving, especially when people are quoting average speeds that don't take into account stops :roll:
  • marcusjb
    marcusjb Posts: 2,412
    jane90 wrote:
    Hi all, a newbie question if you don't mind (from a cycling newbie) - how meaningful is a comparison of average speeds? I went out today at lunchtime for a short 15 mile ride and was struggling to reach a top speed in cold, blustery conditions not much more than my average speed a couple of days ago on a 30 mile ride when it was about 10 degrees warmer and windless. How much of that was due to me being a bit rubbish today and how much the conditions? If the latter, doesn't that make this sort of comparison a bit arbitrary?

    It's not meaningful - unless you ride the same routes a lot of times - certainly day-to-day improvements/set backs are irrelevant(as has been said by myself and others already).

    But detecting trends can make average speeds a useful metric.
    marcusjb wrote:
    Speed's a pretty rubbish measure of anything really - even as a measure against yourself - unless you ride the same course a LOT of times, the individual factors (wind, weather, traffic, tyre pressure etc. etc.) on any given day are too numerous to give really useful metrics.

    On a route you ride a lot, you can start to detect trends as a measure of improvement - but just taking one off faster performances as a sign of improvement is not the right thing to do. Equally, worrying about one slower performance is daft because some days the wind is against you, you don't feel 100% whatever.
  • Comparisons day to day are meaningless. Best thing to do is to look at your average times over the course of a few months at least. If you have a 10 -15 mile course that you like to do, check your times every now and again. But take into account that wind can make a huge difference.
  • upperoilcan
    upperoilcan Posts: 1,180
    pturcot wrote:
    I don't think trying to compare avg with others can give you a ballpark figure on how much to aim for. Personaly my good avg for a 50+ would be 28 mph with a reasonnably moderate to calm windy day. I actually got this avg in a Grand Fondo cyclosport event (not a race just a timed event) on a 70+ ride.

    Pierre

    Is that you Brad ?

    If so let me be the first to congratulate you on taking the sports personality of the year.

    I voted for you.
    Cervelo S5 Ultegra Di2.
  • il_principe
    il_principe Posts: 9,155
    danowat wrote:

    Easy tiger, I did clearly state 'moving average' After all, what's the sodding point of riding if you don't stop for cake?
  • danowat
    danowat Posts: 2,877

    Easy tiger, I did clearly state 'moving average' After all, what's the sodding point of riding if you don't stop for cake?

    I never stop on rides, but that's because all my riding is training for racing and not social,but moving average is extremely misleading 'tiger'.
  • slowbike
    slowbike Posts: 8,498
    danowat wrote:

    It isn't, it's pure willy-waving, especially when people are quoting average speeds that don't take into account stops :roll:
    Well - I don't think it's completely meaningless ... Powermeters are not yet at a price where they're available to everyone, but the vast majority of us know roughly what speed we can realistically achieve - even if some ppl do have a tendency to exaggerate when it comes to forums (btw I cruise all day at 22mph whilst tapping out emails on my tablet and talking on the phone ... yes - complete bullsh1t ... ;) )

    Group rides are often advertised with an average speed guide - and this is done to give guidance as to what sort of pace to expect. Downhills are going to be faster and uphills much slower - but mostly it tends to average out quite well.

    Putting an exact number on it is meaningless - it's no good saying "I average 17.4mph over 50 miles" ... because it's simply a calculation and you'd probably not hit that speed next time you rode it - unless you're really anal and try and stick to it come hell or high water! So a "I ride at 16-18mph" would be more sensible - and this is how many group rides are advertised.

    Personally, I have good and bad days - good days I can be 4-5mph faster than my bad days ... but then good days usually have a good tailwind whilst bad days are headwind all the way! ;)
  • marcusjb
    marcusjb Posts: 2,412

    Easy tiger, I did clearly state 'moving average' After all, what's the sodding point of riding if you don't stop for cake?

    Yep, to be fair he did danowat (and I am in no way trying to put down the performance as my quickest 100 miles is somewhere just north of 7 hours). I just wanted to make the comment on moving average vs elapsed average (and what a difference even just half an hour stopped makes) but, 100%, no cake = no point in riding at all!
  • danowat
    danowat Posts: 2,877
    Nope, it IS meaningless, unless you are all riding in the same conditions and on the same terrain.
  • danowat
    danowat Posts: 2,877
    marcusjb wrote:

    Yep, to be fair he did danowat (and I am in no way trying to put down the performance as my quickest 100 miles is somewhere just north of 7 hours). I just wanted to make the comment on moving average vs elapsed average (and what a difference even just half an hour stopped makes) but, 100%, no cake = no point in riding at all!

    My quickest 100 is 24mph average overall speed, I've ridden 250 miles in 12 hr's, getting on for 21mph average overall speed, good hey?
  • marcusjb
    marcusjb Posts: 2,412
    danowat wrote:
    My quickest 100 is 24mph average overall speed, I've ridden 250 miles in 12 hr's, getting on for 21mph average overall speed, good hey?

    Yebbut, what was your average moving speed? :wink:
  • danowat
    danowat Posts: 2,877
    marcusjb wrote:

    Yebbut, what was your average moving speed? :wink:

    http://app.strava.com/activities/16885865

    My point is context, both rides would have been more impressive if I wasn't racing, and on an old clunker in flappy kit :wink:
  • Grill
    Grill Posts: 5,610
    danowat wrote:

    http://app.strava.com/activities/16885865

    My point is context, both rides would have been more impressive if I wasn't racing, and on an old clunker in flappy kit :wink:

    That's quite flat. Come ride the Welsh 12 this year ;)
    English Cycles V3 | Cervelo P5 | Cervelo T4 | Trek Domane Koppenberg
  • danowat
    danowat Posts: 2,877
    Grill wrote:

    That's quite flat. Come ride the Welsh 12 this year ;)

    Nah, you're alright, I'll leave the hills to the sheep :lol:
  • slowbike
    slowbike Posts: 8,498
    danowat wrote:
    Nope, it IS meaningless, unless you are all riding in the same conditions and on the same terrain.
    Nope - it isn't meaningless ... so long as you're starting and ending at the same altitude.

    Do you think Power is a better indicator? Well - the power required is also going to depend on wind/weather/weight/gradient - exactly the same problems you get with average speed.

    The meaningless bit of it is reporting it to any degree of accuracy.
  • Bozman
    Bozman Posts: 2,518
    Slowbike wrote:
    Nope - it isn't meaningless ... so long as you're starting and ending at the same altitude.

    Do you think Power is a better indicator? Well - the power required is also going to depend on wind/weather/weight/gradient - exactly the same problems you get with average speed.

    The meaningless bit of it is reporting it to any degree of accuracy.

    So you're saying that a gradual climb would be the same as lots of short sharp climbs?
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    Slowbike wrote:
    Nope - it isn't meaningless ... so long as you're starting and ending at the same altitude.

    Hold on - first things first. Inevitably (assuming you ride from/to the same location) you will finish at the same altitude, regardless of where you go. So you're saying it's ok to compare the average speed of a hilly 50 to a flat 50 ??
  • How about my new Fitness Factor?

    FF = (Average Speed on flat over 5km x Age/10 ) / (Heart Rate/100)

    So, if you can do 40km/h, you're 40, with an HR of 150, your FF is 106.6

    If you can do 35km/h, you're 30, with an HR of 160, your FF is 65.6
  • Man this thread is dull.
    the deeper the section the deeper the pleasure.
  • Bobbinogs
    Bobbinogs Posts: 4,841
    How about my new Fitness Factor?

    FF = ...

    How about the next time someone asks about average speed, we all just respond "FFS" and move on :wink:
  • smidsy
    smidsy Posts: 5,273
    Bobbinogs wrote:

    How about the next time someone asks about average speed, we all just respond "FFS" and move on :wink:

    I'm in FFS :mrgreen:
    Yellow is the new Black.
  • I think you've got your 'internet speed' calculation wrong there. It should be x+10% and not x+100%, where x is your actual speed.

    Dont know if it counts but on my mountain bike I averaged 23mph down from the summit of Olympus Mons.
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    Dont know if it counts but on my mountain bike I averaged 23mph down from the summit of Olympus Mons.

    How did you get there from Enceladus?
  • Imposter wrote:

    How did you get there from Enceladus?

    Its a bit cold in Enceladus so like a fly on a toilet seat I got pissed off and left.
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028

    Its a bit cold in Enceladus so like a fly on a toilet seat I got pissed off and left.

    cool story.
  • GGBiker
    GGBiker Posts: 450
    Reliability trial last week averaged 19.1mph over 80 miles, 1 ten minute break at 50 miles for fuel. That was a B group but going hard on a hilly course with over 3000ft climbing. The A group averaged around 21.5mph over the same course (mainly A1-A4 racers).

    For really fast check out the following Strava entry (in a race). Massive power output over the time period also.

    http://app.strava.com/activities/lucan-gp-24-03-2012-portan-co-meath-ireland-county-meath-ireland-5644467?utm_campaign=ride_share&utm_content=8492&utm_medium=widget&utm_source=www.stickybottle.com
  • Grill
    Grill Posts: 5,610
    GGBiker wrote:
    Reliability trial last week averaged 19.1mph over 80 miles, 1 ten minute break at 50 miles for fuel. That was a B group but going hard on a hilly course with over 3000ft climbing. The A group averaged around 21.5mph over the same course (mainly A1-A4 racers).

    For really fast check out the following Strava entry (in a race). Massive power output over the time period also.

    http://app.strava.com/activities/lucan-gp-24-03-2012-portan-co-meath-ireland-county-meath-ireland-5644467?utm_campaign=ride_share&utm_content=8492&utm_medium=widget&utm_source=www.stickybottle.com

    3000ft over 80 miles does not a hilly course make; not even remotely.
    English Cycles V3 | Cervelo P5 | Cervelo T4 | Trek Domane Koppenberg
  • MattC59
    MattC59 Posts: 5,408
    pturcot wrote:
    I don't think trying to compare avg with others can give you a ballpark figure on how much to aim for. Personaly my good avg for a 50+ would be 28 mph with a reasonnably moderate to calm windy day. I actually got this avg in a Grand Fondo cyclosport event (not a race just a timed event) on a 70+ ride.

    So this relate on the time you spend on the saddle and how much miles you got in your legs thus far :oP if your trying to improve. Aim for bettering your own score and be pround everytime you get a better feel on your bike and enjoy! It's not all about numbers but how much fun you get when you push yourself a bit :mrgreen:

    Pierre

    I've got a c0ck like a baby's arm holding an apple too.
    Science adjusts it’s beliefs based on what’s observed.
    Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.