Neil McC wrote:
What Andy P has posted is the Sunday Times Mag article.
Iain F has posted the full q&a format interview transcript, which was edited down and written in an article format for The Sunday Times. Therefore there will be a lot more info in the link Iain F posted.
I think the whole thing is an amazing read.
Copied it into word to print off and read on the way home....over 25,000 words :shock:
I wonder how long someone took to type that up...
Monty Zoncolan wrote:
Amazing in what sense? Revelatory, unbelievable, other?
Vaughters doesn't come out of it too well, though.
Yeah I'm reading the NY Velocity link and he's just dropped Pereiro in it.
Dennisn will be happy with this quote (he won't read the article, obviously, so I'll paste it here): "I mean, I don’t think that there is any way that someone who has never met could get even a remotely accurate picture of me."
off the back wrote:
Kimmage wrote up the notes after he came back - took him over 1 week to write them up ..
Two things to say on this -
a) It is Floyds story. Is is true ... we will never know! And God knows people will be coming out of the woodwork to discredit him on it. But he has taken his opportunity to have his say as a matter of record. I read it all (2hrs!) and think people should read it all as he says it is complex - the doping issue is big complex problem. Cherry picking the gossip for headlines n scoring points is not what this is about.
b) On the last point the much discussed story of blood bags flushed down jacks is denied! He explains that people tooks various facts and prob mashed them together incorrectly ... that seems to go on a lot!!! More reason why people need to read the full story. But again it is only Floyds side of event ...
Do I need to read the whole thing or can I get the gist from the Sunday Times article?! 0:-)