Waaaaayyyy TMI. Burds: read something else.
Comments
-
"Burrowing insects" hmmmm, now that has me worried :?
What are they burrowing into :?:
When do they stop :?:
I am worried. Very worried :!:The older I get the faster I was0 -
This may be a Cervelo issue.
Does your bike look like Voight's?
(Guess who just watched TDF 2008 highlights on ITV4)“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
There does seem to be some confusion or disagreement on which direction the wind's blowing on this picture. No wonder these chaps can't manage to string together a decent Team Time Trial pace.Cycling weakly0 -
This thread only has 64 replies as of now, but over 2200 views. Something tells me the 'no 'Burds'' rule isn't being honoured....... and no idea ...
FCN: 30 -
Greg T wrote:DonDaddyD wrote:I use a vebal disclaimer
I'm not sure that would "stand up" in a court of law or more importantly Kangaroo court here convened.
I - The prosecution - contend that D cubed's pre-apology to a burd is both redundant and uneccesary - suggesting a level of concern for female satisfaction that is bizarre and unnatural - M-Lud.
I suggest to the court that he should attend re-eduction classes and just stop being ghey.
M-Lud, I would further add that the young gentleman in question did knowingly and willingly apply copious amounts of white powder to his John Thomas, (hereby known as the first part of the accused partys' private parts) in a futile attempt to allure said young laydee in a visual spectacle reminiscent of a small firework display and to further entice her with a subtle floral bouquet.
This suggests he approached the young laydee with prior meditation, in the certain knowledge that ultimately his performance would fall short of accepted industry standards.
Since his verbal disclaimer was only muttered after he had already entered into a contractual agreement to copulate with the young laydee it is therfore void and invalid.Cycling weakly0