Musky
Comments
-
A simple analogy in this country is potholes. Fixing piecemeal is cheaper (efficient) in the short term, but more expensive in the long term.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Mark Zuckerberg claimed content moderation went too far at Meta, and it’s time for a change. Its platforms will no longer rely on third-party fact checkers, instead copying the “community notes” feature from Elon Musk’s X.
Meta is getting back to its roots, apparently.
In a video on Tuesday, its chief executive Mark Zuckerberg announced changes to content moderation across Facebook, Instagram, and the company’s other platforms. Meta will be getting rid of fact checkers and replacing them with community notes, similar to what you see on X, the social network owned by world’s richest man and onetime cage-match challenger Elon Musk.
Zuckerberg, in his video, claimed that “we’ve reached a point where it’s just too many mistakes and too much censorship.”
“The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards, once again, prioritizing speech,” he said. “So we’re going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our platforms.”
I guess that's any possibility of a MZ billionaire bout laid to rest then.
0 -
Think what? We'll see what he does and can make our own judgments.
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Eliminating the councils is cheaper still.
0 -
Good point. Do away with councils, do away with council tax and get your servants to do the dirty work for a pittance.
Seemed to work in the good old days.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Given he was talking about cutting $2 trillion, he's going to have to close most of the government down I would have thought.
Either that or he's just making up big numbers to sound impressive.
0 -
Seems like someone has read my post.
"X allows users to switch between a feed of the accounts they follow only, and an algorithmic feed, dubbed “For You”, showing content that might match their interests and previous activity. The more Musk engages with content about the UK from the far right or niche sources, the more he will be served similar content in his “For You” page, according to experts.
“Musk has seemingly become the first tech leader to fall down the rabbit hole of radicalisation by his own product,” said Bruce Daisley, former head of Twitter’s operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
0 -
Shocked.
1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
So it's when he's asked where the $1 trillion dollar cuts are coming from that he can keep his mouth shut.
0 -
"Probably won't" 😄
0 -
If I was a UK politician asked about Musk's latest ill-informed witterings I would just respond with "I respectfully suggest he turns his attentions to finding the efficiency savings he has promised US voters and seems to be unable to deliver rather than getting involved in the politics of other countries".
0 -
Look up the interest payments on the debt, sure he should have been more forthright with the doge savings. You can't argue with the fact the can is getting too big to kick though.
Yeah, just a reminder, dog nappies, do the right thing. I don't deserve shit on my shoes.
0 -
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
-
Any worse than America welcoming Africans?
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
I was referencing Musk.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Yep, it would be worse not to do anything. Same goes for a lot of countries.
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
You think the savings are going to be used to reduce the debt?? You poor innocent child.
0 -
It's worth saying that costs at Twitter (excluding debt servicing) are presumably lower than they were before he took over.
On that basis, he has a track record in cutting costs.
It's also now shit, so there is that on the negative side.
0 -
I didn't say that.
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
So what were you agreeing with then?
0 -
The need to cut government expenditure.
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Then you weren't agreeing with what focuszing posted.
0 -
Glorious ranting from Jonathan Pie
1 -
As I read it I did: he referred to doge savings.
In any event, your point is what?
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0
