If anyone still thinks that SafeSpeed is a reputable organisation with a good, sound stance standing up for people's rights, read the Press Release here:
No wonder Paul has spent so much time frothing here! I'll have to go and see what the playpen says:
Answer is not a lot, apart from quotes from a dissenting judge.
One of the SStormtroopers thinks that governments should be tackled by "the authorities".
Psssst: they ARE the authorities.
Oh, and "yippee!!!!!"
If I had a stalker, I would hug it and kiss it and call it George...or censored
"Mr O'Halloran had said he was driving his vehicle but later retracted, saying he had a right to silence and protection from self-incrimination. Magistrates fined him and added penalty points. "
How did he think he was going to retract? Hypnotise everyone so they forgot he said it?
Am I missing something? If they are driving, they deserve the fine (except I expect they don't think they do, but that's another issue). If they aren't they tell on the person who was. If they weren't and refuse to say, they get the fine anyway, don't they, as the registered owners? So their right to silence just entitles them to take the rap if it wasn't them doesn't it?
If I had a baby elephant, it could help me clean the car. If I had a car.
If I had a baby elephant, it could help me clean the car. If I had a car.
If anyone still thinks that SafeSpeed is a reputable organisation with a good, sound stance standing up for people's rights, read the Press Release here:
Illiterate Green Ink lunacy. Hopefully now the SS will disappear from the radar.
--
<font size="1">[Warning] This post may contain a baby elephant or traces of one</font id="size1">
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
What I don't get is why has he put out TWO press releases one for win, one for loss, BEFORE the verdict was announced? Could he not be bothered to wait, or was he going on holiday or something?
And why 'green' ink? What does that signify please.
If anyone still thinks that SafeSpeed is a reputable organisation with a good, sound stance standing up for people's rights, read the Press Release here:
Illiterate Green Ink lunacy. Hopefully now the SS will disappear from the radar.
--
<font size="1">[Warning] This post may contain a baby elephant or traces of one</font id="size1">
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
What I don't get is why has he put out TWO press releases one for win, one for loss, BEFORE the verdict was announced? Could he not be bothered to wait, or was he going on holiday or something?
And why 'green' ink? What does that signify please.
Probably because a couple of weeks ago there was a European study on road safety released. Paulie completely missed it, and was too late getting his PR out. His PR which, incidentally, he wrote before actually reading the report.
__________________________________________________________
<font size="1">What we need is a new, national <b>White Bicycle Plan</b></font id="size1">
__________________________________________________________
<font>What we need is a new, national <b>White Bicycle Plan</b></font>
Bonj, because he is a loony is the simple answer. The idea of "green ink" is newspaper shorthand for letters from mad ranters.
As for the right to silence, since one of the CJA's (can't be bothered to google it) the caution has included the words (from memory)"it may harm your defence if you fail to mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court"
During interview, there are also Special Warnings, which in essence say (in these cases) "On [date] your car was [offence]. Explain that or let the jury draw adverse conclusions from it".
If I had a stalker, I would hug it and kiss it and call it George...or censored
I think Liberty were involved because of the priciple, and despite the associated nutters.
I would be interested to see if they would support a similar case with BNP associations.
If I had a stalker, I would hug it and kiss it and call it George...or censored
The link in the initial post is corrupt - can someone repair it?
Have I got this right? A vehicle keeper has refused to identify the driver of his car on a particular occasion, and his right to silence has been up held.
In Germany all speed cameras a forward facing, and a conviction can only succeed if the driver can be identified from the picture taken.
Labarum, the case was about the right not implicate yourself, which is an aspect of the right to silence. The motorists claim was dismissed. Hence the hooray
When I carry out an examination, post results , or make an entry in a patients notes - I sign and print so that I can be identified.
This is standard practice in many other fields as well. Would you be happy if you did not know who performed your surgery or prescribed your medication as signing the form "might incriminate them" if something went wrong?
This is about responsibility and being responsible for your actions. Something thatthe speeding lobby simply refuse to recognise
<b><i>He that buys land buys many stones.
He that buys flesh buys many bones.
He that buys eggs buys many shells,
But he that buys good beer buys nothing else.</b></i>
(Unattributed Trad.)
And there you have it: they are capable of judging, etc, etc, safe'n'appropriatezzzzzzzzzz....
But when something goes wrong it's just an accident, not their fault, ad nauseam.
Responsibilityis exactly the point.
Posts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SafeSpeedPR/message/380
Illiterate Green Ink lunacy. Hopefully now the SS will disappear from the radar.
--
<font size="1">[Warning] This post may contain a baby elephant or traces of one</font id="size1">
Answer is not a lot, apart from quotes from a dissenting judge.
One of the SStormtroopers thinks that governments should be tackled by "the authorities".
Psssst: they ARE the authorities.
Oh, and "yippee!!!!!"
If I had a stalker, I would hug it and kiss it and call it George...or censored
http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/?o=3 ... =3244&v=5K
Another year older, another Budweiser
The tanks are invading the airport right behind you mate.
__________________________________________________________
<font size="1">What we need is a new, national <b>White Bicycle Plan</b></font id="size1">
<font>What we need is a new, national <b>White Bicycle Plan</b></font>
"Mr O'Halloran had said he was driving his vehicle but later retracted, saying he had a right to silence and protection from self-incrimination. Magistrates fined him and added penalty points. "
How did he think he was going to retract? Hypnotise everyone so they forgot he said it?
Am I missing something? If they are driving, they deserve the fine (except I expect they don't think they do, but that's another issue). If they aren't they tell on the person who was. If they weren't and refuse to say, they get the fine anyway, don't they, as the registered owners? So their right to silence just entitles them to take the rap if it wasn't them doesn't it?
If I had a baby elephant, it could help me clean the car. If I had a car.
If anyone still thinks that SafeSpeed is a reputable organisation with a good, sound stance standing up for people's rights, read the Press Release here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SafeSpeedPR/message/380
Illiterate Green Ink lunacy. Hopefully now the SS will disappear from the radar.
--
<font size="1">[Warning] This post may contain a baby elephant or traces of one</font id="size1">
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
What I don't get is why has he put out TWO press releases one for win, one for loss, BEFORE the verdict was announced? Could he not be bothered to wait, or was he going on holiday or something?
And why 'green' ink? What does that signify please.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jaded</i>
If anyone still thinks that SafeSpeed is a reputable organisation with a good, sound stance standing up for people's rights, read the Press Release here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SafeSpeedPR/message/380
Illiterate Green Ink lunacy. Hopefully now the SS will disappear from the radar.
--
<font size="1">[Warning] This post may contain a baby elephant or traces of one</font id="size1">
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
What I don't get is why has he put out TWO press releases one for win, one for loss, BEFORE the verdict was announced? Could he not be bothered to wait, or was he going on holiday or something?
And why 'green' ink? What does that signify please.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Probably because a couple of weeks ago there was a European study on road safety released. Paulie completely missed it, and was too late getting his PR out. His PR which, incidentally, he wrote before actually reading the report.
__________________________________________________________
<font size="1">What we need is a new, national <b>White Bicycle Plan</b></font id="size1">
<font>What we need is a new, national <b>White Bicycle Plan</b></font>
As for the right to silence, since one of the CJA's (can't be bothered to google it) the caution has included the words (from memory)"it may harm your defence if you fail to mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court"
During interview, there are also Special Warnings, which in essence say (in these cases) "On [date] your car was [offence]. Explain that or let the jury draw adverse conclusions from it".
If I had a stalker, I would hug it and kiss it and call it George...or censored
http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/?o=3 ... =3244&v=5K
I would be interested to see if they would support a similar case with BNP associations.
If I had a stalker, I would hug it and kiss it and call it George...or censored
http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/?o=3 ... =3244&v=5K
Is Bonj 12 years old or what?
If you thought he was bad before, he is now dabbling in drugs, see the Pharmacy section
Have I got this right? A vehicle keeper has refused to identify the driver of his car on a particular occasion, and his right to silence has been up held.
In Germany all speed cameras a forward facing, and a conviction can only succeed if the driver can be identified from the picture taken.
When I carry out an examination, post results , or make an entry in a patients notes - I sign and print so that I can be identified.
This is standard practice in many other fields as well. Would you be happy if you did not know who performed your surgery or prescribed your medication as signing the form "might incriminate them" if something went wrong?
This is about responsibility and being responsible for your actions. Something thatthe speeding lobby simply refuse to recognise
He that buys flesh buys many bones.
He that buys eggs buys many shells,
But he that buys good beer buys nothing else.</b></i>
(Unattributed Trad.)
But when something goes wrong it's just an accident, not their fault, ad nauseam.
Responsibilityis exactly the point.
http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/?o=3 ... =3244&v=5K
Fixed, as best I can.