Strava energy nonsense
![pep.fermi](https://forum.bikeradar.com/uploads/userpics/R04IQS8428TF/nWTTMK2ZJ58QD.jpg)
pep.fermi
Posts: 383
Anyone else finding Strava nonsense?
According to Strava, running longer (18 vs 17km), and faster (4:47 vs 4:56/km), costs me less energy, not more: 1062 vs 1437 cal.
Fine with neither number pretending to be accurate, but I'd expect consistency.
GPS worked fine on both occasion.
According to Strava, running longer (18 vs 17km), and faster (4:47 vs 4:56/km), costs me less energy, not more: 1062 vs 1437 cal.
Fine with neither number pretending to be accurate, but I'd expect consistency.
GPS worked fine on both occasion.
0
Comments
-
Heart rate monitor? Lower heart rate, lower calories.
It is a nonsense figure though, best ignored.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0