Piers Morgan
Comments
-
He had an uncanny knack that, even when he was saying something I agreed with, turning me in favour of the person I disagreed with (gun control was the one exception to this as the person he would be arguing against would invariably be even more moronic). His MO seems to be get two guests with opposing views, let the one you agree with have their say and then join them in, literally, shouting down the other voice. I could never understand anyone agreeing to be interviewed by him but then on the ocassions people did refuse to "face" him he would denounce them as a coward.focuszing723 said:
I don't know, wasn't he very vociferous about gun control in America whilst he worked there. I would say his morals were in the right place to take that on, knowing the opposition he would face.MattFalle said:Thing is though, he'll be back and all this will be forgotten.
Its the same as Eric Clapton - his past has been quite happily forgotten....
Morgan has done this in the past but ratings and money matter more than morals....0 -
The "hounded out" was reference to Winton Marshall.rick_chasey said:Lol was he hounded out?
I don't get this idea that because you hold an unpopular opinion you're not allowed to be told that it's a terrible opinion. If you want to do that on a platform that allows thousands of people to tell you its a terrible opinion, that's your choice.
That's no different to not being allowed to say something for fear of offence.
I'd suggested that being threatened by the mafia for saying you like a book is even more than "hounded out".The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Yes. That's fair.Pross said:
He had an uncanny knack that, even when he was saying something I agreed with, turning me in favour of the person I disagreed with (gun control was the one exception to this as the person he would be arguing against would invariably be even more moronic). His MO seems to be get two guests with opposing views, let the one you agree with have their say and then join them in, literally, shouting down the other voice. I could never understand anyone agreeing to be interviewed by him but then on the ocassions people did refuse to "face" him he would denounce them as a coward.focuszing723 said:
I don't know, wasn't he very vociferous about gun control in America whilst he worked there. I would say his morals were in the right place to take that on, knowing the opposition he would face.MattFalle said:Thing is though, he'll be back and all this will be forgotten.
Its the same as Eric Clapton - his past has been quite happily forgotten....
Morgan has done this in the past but ratings and money matter more than morals....0 -
There's a difference between being told that you have a terrible opinion and having a baying mob causing a craven employer to force you to apologise or else lose your job.rick_chasey said:Lol was he hounded out?
I don't get this idea that because you hold an unpopular opinion you're not allowed to be told that it's a terrible opinion. If you want to do that on a platform that allows thousands of people to tell you its a terrible opinion, that's your choice.
That's no different to not being allowed to say something for fear of offence.
Perhaps in a way the po-mo crowd are right about everything being a power dynamic - and the activists have found a way to exert power.1 -
They might be onto something, yes. I suspect that a lot of the harrumphing about cancel culture is from people unaccustomed to direct challenge.bompington said:
There's a difference between being told that you have a terrible opinion and having a baying mob causing a craven employer to force you to apologise or else lose your job.rick_chasey said:Lol was he hounded out?
I don't get this idea that because you hold an unpopular opinion you're not allowed to be told that it's a terrible opinion. If you want to do that on a platform that allows thousands of people to tell you its a terrible opinion, that's your choice.
That's no different to not being allowed to say something for fear of offence.
Perhaps in a way the po-mo crowd are right about everything being a power dynamic - and the activists have found a way to exert power.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
You get what I mean about a job though, right? There's plenty of things you are allowed to do in general that you can't do in a job and would get you sacked.bompington said:
There's a difference between being told that you have a terrible opinion and having a baying mob causing a craven employer to force you to apologise or else lose your job.rick_chasey said:Lol was he hounded out?
I don't get this idea that because you hold an unpopular opinion you're not allowed to be told that it's a terrible opinion. If you want to do that on a platform that allows thousands of people to tell you its a terrible opinion, that's your choice.
That's no different to not being allowed to say something for fear of offence.
Perhaps in a way the po-mo crowd are right about everything being a power dynamic - and the activists have found a way to exert power.
In a b2c business then you need to pay attention to what the public think, as that's part of the job, surely?0 -
Ours are currently in residence right by it, while their home gets sorted out.Pross said:
Penarth. RJS beat me to posting it, a fine example.focuszing723 said:
That is quite a nice pier actually.rjsterry said:
I can go one better: a pier in (Gla)morgan.focuszing723 said:
You could change it to just 'Piers'. This is the Prince of Wales pier, built in the early 1900s it now serves as a boat launch to ferries across the bay and up the River Fal.
#friendswithswankyplaces"Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
Since this is sort of about TV.
BBC becomes a bit more like a state broadcaster.0 -
I posted in the irony thread - this means Geoff Norcott losing one of his regular slots on TV.rick_chasey said:Since this is sort of about TV.
BBC becomes a bit more like a state broadcaster.
0 -
I would imagine that if its as popular as that thread suggests, it'll get picked up by another channel.
Cancelling outright, rather than just trying to find some funny right wing stuff does seem an odd thing to do, given how much concern they apparently have around cancel culture.0 -
I thought it was a bit shit, but to cancel it?
The Frankie Boyle show was probably more lefty than the Mash Report
0 -
It'll be poor viewing figures that has done for it.[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0
-
many Piers go up in flames.focuszing723 said:
You could change it to just 'Piers'. This is the Prince of Wales pier, built in the early 1900s it now serves as a boat launch to ferries across the bay and up the River Fal.0 -
Wait until Piers lands himself on GB News, that'll be a political brainflame that'll be a thrill to watch.0
-
focuszing723 said:
You could change it to just 'Piers'. This is the Prince of Wales pier, built in the early 1900s it now serves as a boat launch to ferries across the bay and up the River Fal.
Oh no, that's just making it worse...
0 -
it'll be lapped up in britain tbh.gethinceri said:Wait until Piers lands himself on GB News, that'll be a political brainflame that'll be a thrill to watch.
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Maybe you do. Perhaps, for example, record companies need to include lists of books you're not allowed to read in every banjo player's contract.rick_chasey said:
You get what I mean about a job though, right? There's plenty of things you are allowed to do in general that you can't do in a job and would get you sacked.bompington said:
There's a difference between being told that you have a terrible opinion and having a baying mob causing a craven employer to force you to apologise or else lose your job.rick_chasey said:Lol was he hounded out?
I don't get this idea that because you hold an unpopular opinion you're not allowed to be told that it's a terrible opinion. If you want to do that on a platform that allows thousands of people to tell you its a terrible opinion, that's your choice.
That's no different to not being allowed to say something for fear of offence.
Perhaps in a way the po-mo crowd are right about everything being a power dynamic - and the activists have found a way to exert power.
In a b2c business then you need to pay attention to what the public think, as that's part of the job, surely?0 -
I don't think it's the 'reading' of the books that is the problem. Mein Kampf and Das Kapital used to be (maybe still are) required reading on RMA officer cadet courses.bompington said:
Maybe you do. Perhaps, for example, record companies need to include lists of books you're not allowed to read in every banjo player's contract.rick_chasey said:
You get what I mean about a job though, right? There's plenty of things you are allowed to do in general that you can't do in a job and would get you sacked.bompington said:
There's a difference between being told that you have a terrible opinion and having a baying mob causing a craven employer to force you to apologise or else lose your job.rick_chasey said:Lol was he hounded out?
I don't get this idea that because you hold an unpopular opinion you're not allowed to be told that it's a terrible opinion. If you want to do that on a platform that allows thousands of people to tell you its a terrible opinion, that's your choice.
That's no different to not being allowed to say something for fear of offence.
Perhaps in a way the po-mo crowd are right about everything being a power dynamic - and the activists have found a way to exert power.
In a b2c business then you need to pay attention to what the public think, as that's part of the job, surely?
Agreeing with them is the problem - not reading them. Reading them is good.
0 -
Sorry, I've missed which banjo player we're talking about. Or are we not allowed to say.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Some bloke from Mumford and Sons. He said he liked a book and that the writer was brave for writing it, lots of people decided the book was problematic (I assume without reading it) and he left the band.
I don't know anything about the writer other than the book was about Antifa and BLM. I don't know anything about Mumford and Sons except those two catchy songs.
0 -
Oh, yes, I dimly remember reading something about him.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!2 -
oh they wereshit anyway, so its no great loss tbh.kingstongraham said:Some bloke from Mumford and Sons. He said he liked a book and that the writer was brave for writing it, lots of people decided the book was problematic (I assume without reading it) and he left the band.
I don't know anything about the writer other than the book was about Antifa and BLM. I don't know anything about Mumford and Sons except those two catchy songs.
bit like that recent sea shanty rubbish.
.The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Wonder if it has dawned on him yet that it was silly to give up the day job?MattFalle said:
oh they wereshit anyway, so its no great loss tbh.kingstongraham said:Some bloke from Mumford and Sons. He said he liked a book and that the writer was brave for writing it, lots of people decided the book was problematic (I assume without reading it) and he left the band.
I don't know anything about the writer other than the book was about Antifa and BLM. I don't know anything about Mumford and Sons except those two catchy songs.
bit like that recent sea shanty rubbish.The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
Aren't Mumford & Sons a westcountry removals firm..?0
-
blazing_saddles said:
Ours are currently in residence right by it, while their home gets sorted out.
#friendswithswankyplaces
What does "withs" mean
0 -
Any links or further info - I must admit that I didn't follow the shanty saga too close.pblakeney said:
Wonder if it has dawned on him yet that it was silly to give up the day job?MattFalle said:
oh they wereshit anyway, so its no great loss tbh.kingstongraham said:Some bloke from Mumford and Sons. He said he liked a book and that the writer was brave for writing it, lots of people decided the book was problematic (I assume without reading it) and he left the band.
I don't know anything about the writer other than the book was about Antifa and BLM. I don't know anything about Mumford and Sons except those two catchy songs.
bit like that recent sea shanty rubbish..The camera down the willy isn't anything like as bad as it sounds.
0 -
Piers vs Brett Lee. I'm sure Piers is suffering ongoing ptsd.0