Endura Pro SL Bib Shorts Q's

When selecting the Chamois width (Narrow, Medium and Wide), does the actual Chamois width alter or is it the padding itself which alters in width and the Chamois remains the same size throughout the range?
I'm concerned if I order a wide pad, the groin area of the pad will be too wide and have too much "overhang" and cause discomfort, where the legs meet the torso.
Secondly, are the sizings accurate or would you go +1, as with most shorts.
Thanks
I'm concerned if I order a wide pad, the groin area of the pad will be too wide and have too much "overhang" and cause discomfort, where the legs meet the torso.
Secondly, are the sizings accurate or would you go +1, as with most shorts.
Thanks

0
Posts
I've never seen the different width pads as the narrow one worked for me from the off, so not able to shed any light on that sorry.
I am circa 67kg, and wear XS, most of my other shorts are small (Rapha, Ale, Castelli) and I like a snug fit.
Marin Palisades Trail 91 and 06
Scott CR1 SL 12
Cannondale Synapse Adventure 15 & 16 Di2
Scott Foil 18
I ended up sizing up and buying the Medium with Medium pad (my saddle tells me I needed a Wide pad).
But it was too tight around the crotch.
So I then bought the Large with Narrow pad, this seems a lot better for me.
The dimensions on the sizing charts seem massive between Medium and Large, but in reality there's just a small difference in fit.
There's less "overhang" with the Narrow pad, but apart from that I couldn't tell the difference between the pads for sit bone coverage etc.
The only downside in sizing up two sizes for me, was the leg grippers aren't tight against my legs and ride up slightly.
Comparing the pad between the Endura Pro SL and the Assos Mille GT Bib Shorts.
I preferred the Endura's and didn't rate the Assos at all.