LEAVE the Conservative Party and save your country!

1110711081110111211131127

Comments

  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,107

    I went to see who the Telegraph was leading on for the Tory Leadership election.


  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,329

    You see it a different way to me. I see no issue with looking to repeat or build on past successes.

    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661

    It’s 40 years ago!

  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,513

    That's fine, but it was a response to a particular set of circumstances in the late 70s. Those circumstances don't and can't exist again. We've already made that transition from an outdated manufacturing economy to a services economy, so we can't do it again. Thatcher was also very socially conservative by today's standards. It would be weird to go back to that.

    There's also the small matter of the party heading in the opposite direction for the last 8 years so there's some way to go to even get back to a Cameron Osborne version of conservatism.

    A lot of Thatcher fans also forget that she'd almost blown it before Argentina invaded the Falklands. Mind you, Milei is probably bonkers enough to invade the Falklands so...

    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,135

    Are you a tad bit concerned that there haven't been any fresh ideas or new talent from the Conservatives for nearly half a century?

  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,329
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,329

    Circumstances change but certain things can still be applied to solve current problems.

    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    edited September 5

    It would be more convincing if you backed the kind of action she did.

    After all, she settled a whole host of union disputes by agreeing to pay rises in order to stop strikes.

    She was in favour of membership of the European Single Market and Customs Union

    She was keen on privatising the British railways, rather than owning them piecemeal.

    She supported various international organisations that were reseraching climate change, such as the Centre for Climate Research and Prediction.

    She was happy to close uncompetitive mines, rather than give government grants to reopen them (!).


    What about that reflects anything the Conservative gov't did between 2010 and 2024?


    Do you really think Thatcher would have spent billions paying for people's gas bills because of a war? Do you really think she would be opposing means testing benefits? Come off it

    The reality is, Thatcher would have seen the threats like Climate Change and rather than burry her head in the sand in some populist move she'd probably have done something about it.

    I'm not an enormous fan, but this idea somehow that current conservatism is anything like Thatcherism is beyond a joke.

  • monkimark
    monkimark Posts: 1,926

    There are some similarities


  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,329

    It's this sort reaction that makes me think she will be a good choice.

    Given you're some sort born again leftie (having voted Labour at the last GE), what do you think to judging Starmer now based on when he was Corbyns bag carrier?

    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661

    Just because they say they like Thatcher doesn't mean they actually enact the same policies she did/ would have.

  • MidlandsGrimpeur2
    MidlandsGrimpeur2 Posts: 2,110
    edited September 5

    Badenoch is like all the other prominent Tory MP's over the last few years, can't take any responsibility for her actions, repeatedly makes stuff up and then when called out on it deflects and turns the blame around on to her questioner. Look at her track record with journalists over the last few years.

    Love or Loathe Thatcher, she absolutely stood by her convictions and would argue the merits of her decisions frankly with anyone. I don't see a single person in the Tory leadership race who can make a similar claim around ownership of their decisions.

  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,135

    That's a reaction to you, not Badenoch, Stevo.

    Have you thought about running yourself? There's bound to be another leadership contest in a year of two.

  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,461

    I may be wrong but I also don't recall her Governments being massively anti-immigration

  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,513
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,288

    I think Stevo just thinks 1979 Thatcher is like some kind of Top Trump that will magically bring back those 'glory days' regardless of all the privatised sewage that has flowed under the bridge since then.

    The only parallel I see between Thatcher and Badenoch is that they are both women. Other than that, not so much, and Badenoch would, I suspect, be welcomed by Labour, as she cannot escape the stink of the last government, however belligerent she makes herself out to be.

    Anyway, whoever it is is going to be pretty irrelevant for a while yet.

  • kingstongraham
    kingstongraham Posts: 28,107

    I can't decide if Jenrick or Badenoch would be worse for the Conservatives. Badenoch would probably survive a bit longer, is that good or bad?

  • secretsqirrel
    secretsqirrel Posts: 2,118

    It’s telling and bothersome that the moment Patel starts talking some sense, she’s out.

  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,601

    They are both from STEM backgrounds, although I'm not sure that actually makes any difference.

    Given most millennials either do not give a crap about Thatcher, or have been raised to actively hate her, I don't think invoking her is some kind of magic Trump card that will widen the conservatives appeal...

  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,329
    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • Stevo_666
    Stevo_666 Posts: 61,329

    Nope, but it would be good to have someone with similar qualities.

    "I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,227

    Maggie certainly serviced Redcar and the NE England so well, so I can feel your warmth...

  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,513

    Indeed. Can't make the connection with Badenoch though. Thatcher was just on a different planet in terms of political operation and getting things done.

    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,103

    If you listen to the Telegraph podcasts about each of the potential leaders they do indeed suggest she us the closest to a modern day Thatcher.

    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,513

    I suppose one of them must be more like (or less unlike) Thatcher than the others.

    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • monkimark
    monkimark Posts: 1,926

    Its all relative.

    In my house, I am the closest to being a modern day Albert Einstein.

  • DeVlaeminck
    DeVlaeminck Posts: 9,103

    I still think a populist led Tory party will win the next election. We've seen big political swings from left to right back and forth in many Western democracies and we have seen a growth in populism.

    There may not be a market for US style Christian fundamentalist politics but low immigration, anti self gender identification type policies appeal broadly.

    Add in a dash of patriotism and in Badenoch's case a pretty safe defence against charges of racism and that's a decent base to fight from. Labour have a big majority and a lot of new MPs, a lot who will have bought into woke ideology (I think that can be used in a non pejorative way now), bought into spending more and bought into pro palestine all of which could make the party open to internal division and provide ammunition for opponents. They really need to turn the economy round.

    [Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]
  • Jezyboy
    Jezyboy Posts: 3,601

    Meh, populism generally relies on a bit of a cult figure who can generate sufficient support to win under whatever electoral system.

    Badenoch doesn't have the same star power as a Trump or a Johnson.

    Potentially, if Farage could get Tory leadership, there's a route to the cult of personality type success, but then he loses his "outsider" appeal.

    Plus Starmer just has to lower immigration to slightly less than record levels and he can rightfully claim to be tougher on immigration than the Tories.

  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 29,513

    How on earth do low immigration and "anti self gender identification type policies" (whatever TF that is) and a dash of patriotism turn the economy round?

    That's at best a Twitter bio, not a vision for running a country

    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition