Giro TT sweepstake (may contain spoilers when all is done)
No_Ta_Doctor
Posts: 14,692
So, the big TT (not actually very big, but very important) is upon us and all eyes are on how much time Dumoulin will take out of Yates.
Borrowing the excellent work of bobmcstuff:
So predict your timegap here, and win possible bragging rights for all eternity.
Predictions so far: (please try and pick a time nobody else has...)
maddog 2 » 43"
the article don » 54"
TailWindHome » 59"
Rick Chasey » 1' 10"
Fat Cat » 1:17
underlayunderlay » 1'18"
mfin » 1'20"
KingstonGraham » 1'21"
CarbonClem » 1 min 30
kleinstroker » 1'31"
FleshTuxedo » 1:33
Richmond Racer 2 » 1m 37s
redvision » 1'38
mididoctors » 1:39
Rick Chasey » 1' 40" - Dodgy change to the big ring and 70". Not sure that's UCI reg compliant.
Gweeds » 1'43''
M.R.M. » 1'47"
Salsiccia1 » 1'49"
Milton50 » 1'51"
diplodicus » 1 min 55
No tA Doctor » 1'58"
Tashman » 1:59
Poptart242 » 2m dead
r0bh » 2'01"
daninexile » 2'05
TakeTheHighRoad » 2'07"
bobmcstuff » 2'08"
DeadCalm » 2:10
inseine » 2.11
Mad_Malx » 2'12"
greasedscotsman » 2' 13"
Crozza » 2:16
RichN95 » 2.19
Dialatron » 2:22
ShutupJens » 2:25
Above The Cows » 2'42"
Blazing Saddles » 2'-48"
smithy21 » 2’51
Ridgerider » 3:30
Borrowing the excellent work of bobmcstuff:
bobmcstuff wrote:
Well converting from my post above, an average based on previous performances would result in Yates losing 1 minute 43s to Dumoulin.
If Dumoulin has an alright day, so getting into the top half of his wins against Yates, he would take 2 minutes, which still wouldn't quite give him the lead (obviously).
A good day for Dumoulin might see him take 2 minutes 15s or so.
If Dumoulin has an absolute stormer, and/or Yates has a shocker, Dumoulin might take as much as 2 minutes 51 seconds. 3 minutes would be probably the outer limits of reasonable. You have to think that's unlikely though, given Yates' performances to date.
3s/km = 1 min 43s
3.5s/km = 2 mins
4s/km = 2 min 17s
4.5s/km = 2 min 34s
5s/km = 2 min 51s
So predict your timegap here, and win possible bragging rights for all eternity.
Predictions so far: (please try and pick a time nobody else has...)
maddog 2 » 43"
the article don » 54"
TailWindHome » 59"
Rick Chasey » 1' 10"
Fat Cat » 1:17
underlayunderlay » 1'18"
mfin » 1'20"
KingstonGraham » 1'21"
CarbonClem » 1 min 30
kleinstroker » 1'31"
FleshTuxedo » 1:33
Richmond Racer 2 » 1m 37s
redvision » 1'38
mididoctors » 1:39
Rick Chasey » 1' 40" - Dodgy change to the big ring and 70". Not sure that's UCI reg compliant.
Gweeds » 1'43''
M.R.M. » 1'47"
Salsiccia1 » 1'49"
Milton50 » 1'51"
diplodicus » 1 min 55
No tA Doctor » 1'58"
Tashman » 1:59
Poptart242 » 2m dead
r0bh » 2'01"
daninexile » 2'05
TakeTheHighRoad » 2'07"
bobmcstuff » 2'08"
DeadCalm » 2:10
inseine » 2.11
Mad_Malx » 2'12"
greasedscotsman » 2' 13"
Crozza » 2:16
RichN95 » 2.19
Dialatron » 2:22
ShutupJens » 2:25
Above The Cows » 2'42"
Blazing Saddles » 2'-48"
smithy21 » 2’51
Ridgerider » 3:30
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format
0
Comments
-
1m 37s
Let it be so.0 -
My prediction: 1'58"Warning No formatter is installed for the format0
-
Richmond Racer 2 wrote:1m 37s
Let it be so.
And thus it was spoken and thus it was. Possibly.Warning No formatter is installed for the format0 -
2m dead. Hope it's much less though!0
-
3:30
I hate Yates.Half man, Half bike0 -
Ridgerider wrote:I hate Yates.Twitter: @RichN950
-
Because he will we sitting in the back of his bus today waiting for his totally legal jiffy bag to arrive to get him through the last week.
Or have I got his TUE exemption all out of perspective?Half man, Half bike0 -
1'49"It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0
-
1'51"0
-
Ridgerider wrote:Or have I got his TUE exemption all out of perspective?
Yes0 -
2'12"0
-
1'380
-
2'050
-
Interesting problem - TD will presumably have to go all out in order to try and put pressure back on, Yates has the advantage of knowing what's going on ahead. I'm going to be stupidly bold and predict TD gets his pacing wrong in an attempt to do too much too early - 1'18"0
-
1'21"0
-
Mad_Malx wrote:Ridgerider wrote:Or have I got his TUE exemption all out of perspective?
Yes
Also the E in TUE already stands for Exemption. You don't need to write it again. Unless you've had an exemption from your exemption.
Like people who say "PIN number" :x0 -
2’510
-
2'01"0
-
The profile for anyone who's interested:
0 -
2'08" for me I think...0
-
bobmcstuff wrote:Mad_Malx wrote:Ridgerider wrote:Or have I got his TUE exemption all out of perspective?
Yes
Also the E in TUE already stands for Exemption. You don't need to write it again. Unless you've had an exemption from your exemption.
Like people who say "PIN number" :x
Sorry...Back to the topic.Half man, Half bike0 -
4 minutes!Half man, Half bike0
-
Ridgerider wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:Mad_Malx wrote:Ridgerider wrote:Or have I got his TUE exemption all out of perspective?
Yes
Also the E in TUE already stands for Exemption. You don't need to write it again. Unless you've had an exemption from your exemption.
Like people who say "PIN number" :x
Sorry...Back to the topic.
I thought management consultants had a rep for too many words, not too few
And I'm not one, anyway0 -
2'-48"
To Tom Diesel, that is. :P
Interesting interview with Orica DS Shayne Bannan on Simon Yates.
Covers 3rd week fatigue and time trialing among other things.
https://www.flobikes.com/events/6173896 ... ng=6204725"Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
-
-
2:11 leaving them tied on time.
Rats. Beaten to it. Hmm. 2;12 then.0