Nutriton and strength
Comments
-
I think you'll find it's a combination of strong legs and cv fitness.0
-
Aberdeen_lune wrote:I think you'll find it's a combination of strong legs and cv fitness.
Nope. Genuinely, this discussion has been had many, many times on this forum. Do a search and find all the relevant threads, complete with all the relevant links to all the relevant studies. You really are on the wrong track here.0 -
Aberdeen_lune wrote:I think you'll find it's a combination of strong legs and cv fitness.
Whatever :roll:
You currently have enough strength in your legs to win the Tour de France, I doubt however, you have the fitness.0 -
Aberdeen Lune - I don't think you've read that thread in the link (to be fair, it is a long one). This post from Alex - lifted from it is worth a read though..Alex_Simmons/RST wrote:Physiologically & physically speaking:
Strength is the maximal force generating ability of a muscle or group of muscles.
By definition it occurs at zero velocity. However, practically speaking and in the context of the primary muscles involved in cycling, we can define strength as the maximal mass lifted in a one rep free standing squat.
Power is the rate of doing work, or of energy transfer.
It can be also defined as a force x velocity
Power can refer to very rapid acceleration activities taking only fractions of a second or a few seconds (e.g. throwing, sprinting) or to much longer duration activities (e.g. endurance cycling, running, swimming).
For a start, force and power are not the same thing. You can apply a huge force to something (e.g. push hard against a brick wall) but unless it is also moving, then you are applying no power.
Also by definition, the greater the rate at which we do something, the lower the force we are able to apply. Even in maximal sprint efforts on a bike, there is a linear relationship between maximal force applied to the pedals and the rate at which we are pedaling.
Typically, the forces involved in endurance cycling are sub-maximal, significantly so.
e.g. even at 300 watts, at regular cadences and crank lengths, the average effective pedal force is less than 20kg, which means that regular cycling (a vast majority of which is performed < 300W) requires forces roughly an order of magnitude less than (i.e. 1/10th of) our strength.
What matters is being able to apply such low forces repeatedly for long periods and our limiting factor for that is not our maximal force generation ability but rather the biochemical processes going on in our muscle cells, i.e. our aerobic metabolism (ability to turnover ATP).
Increasing strength (i.e. maximal force generation ability) has not been conclusively shown to result in ability to increase our sustainable power, which isn't all that surprising since the physiological adaptations resulting from training that increases strength (e.g. enhancing neurological recruitment, but more importantly, increasing muscle fibre cross sectional area via hypertrophy and associated mitochondral dilution) run counter to those that improve our ability to turnover ATP (i.e. increased mitochondral density and capillarisation inside the muscles, reducing the cell diffusion distance and so on).
The density of mitochondria (which are the energy plants inside our muscle cells) and the ability to readily exchange gases (O2 & CO2) and key metabolites (e.g. glycogen) is the primary limiting factor in endurance cycling.
Fewer mitochondria per kg of muscle mass = lower sustainable power to mass.
To increase strength (beyond an initial neurological improvement which occurs in the first few weeks of such training) requires hypertrophy, which in turns reduces our power to mass ratio.
Now if one is talking about training (with weights for example) that doesn't increase strength, then that's not strength training, and it's a different discussion.0 -
Imposter wrote:Aberdeen_lune wrote:I think you'll find it's a combination of strong legs and cv fitness.
Nope. Genuinely, this discussion has been had many, many times on this forum. Do a search and find all the relevant threads, complete with all the relevant links to all the relevant studies. You really are on the wrong track here.0 -
I do find this area confusing or maybe it's just the semantics. I don't do weight training for leg "strength" as such but do find that if I don't include regular lower cadence, hill repeats in my training regime, my cycling performance suffers.
My legs just feel "stronger" for it or maybe that's just an increase in stamina?0 -
It's an interesting debate. In Joe Freil's training bible he states "muscular force is a major component in time trialling, climbing and sprinting". He goes on to state "every successful athlete I have trained has lifted weights for at least part of the season".
So food for thought for you guys who shun the gym. Though to be fair I have shunned the gym for many years it is only this winter that I have started building strength training into my winter training schedule. Will be interesting to see if it has an impact on my 2018 racing season.0 -
Aberdeen_lune wrote:It's an interesting debate. In Joe Freil's training bible he states "muscular force is a major component in time trialling, climbing and sprinting". He goes on to state "every successful athlete I have trained has lifted weights for at least part of the season".
He's absolutely right - muscular force IS a major component in all of those things. Without being able to apply it, we would not be able to turn the pedals. His other claim is simply an anecdote and contains no information on which to base any weight training regime.0 -
Aberdeen_lune wrote:
So food for thought for you guys who shun the gym. Though to be fair I have shunned the gym for many years it is only this winter that I have started building strength training into my winter training schedule. Will be interesting to see if it has an impact on my 2018 racing season.
None whatsoeverI'm sorry you don't believe in miracles0