Tower Block Fire
Pross
Posts: 38,811
Watching the shocking scenes in West London. It looks absolutely horrendous and one of the worst nightmares. Hopefully everyone got out but I seriously doubt it especially with the reports of people jumping from higher floors. I'm amazed that with current regulations it spread so quickly and fiercely, something seems to have gone badly wrong.
0
Posts
According to BBC reports, concerns over fire safety were raised during recent refurbishment works:
The local Grenfell Action Group had claimed, before and during the refurbishment, the block constituted a fire risk and residents had warned that access to the site for emergency vehicles was "severely restricted"
https://grenfellactiongroup.wordpress.c ... -fire/amp/
https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
Facebook? No. Just say no.
It's always the case with these things though that new builds have to meet the regulations, but older buildings don't meet them.
It seems this particular block was refurbished a year ago, so any part of it that was changed would have to be done properly, whether it was or not is another question. But blocks such as this that haven't been refurbed are often incredibly dangerous and I'm surprised that this doesn't happen more often.
why is the advice to stay in your flat and await the fire service? esp as they seem to only have equipment to get water half way up the tower block.
that ll be a first.
So this is the safest approach, on the assumption the usual fire preventers work - sprinklers etc.
In this instance they appear to not have been either installed, were disabled, or faulty.
Reports are most residents who survived were woken up by screams and smoke, not by a fire alarm.
No. Corporate manslaughter jails people. This was one of the first i found...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/your ... cases.html
Edit: Admittedly, most of them are fines, apart from Mr Kite.
The older I get, the better I was.
That blog post is remarkably prophetic in its accuracy. There are several other blocks in the vicinity and I can't imagine those residents will be particularly keen on remaining there now, either...
Yep, if half the comments regarding smoke alarms etc. are true not to mention that report then there will rightly be some corporate manslaughter cases coming out of this. I'm really struggling to understand the speed it went up at, I suspect there will be dozens of fatalities as anyone who didn't get out of the top half quickly is unlikely to have survived.
As Rick said, it should be safer than battling down stairwells in a fire. Not just the flames but the risk of being trampled in a panic (and obstructing fire fighters trying to get up the stairs). I think the fire doors are supposed to protect for at least an hour but seem to have failed spectacularly here.
I think I'd be making a run for it.
The older I get, the better I was.
In it's original guise, any fire would be contained on the floor on which it started. Only now, because the fire is on the outside of the building, it is entering through windows and spreading from floor to floor. So the advice of "in the event of a fire, remain in your flat" no longer holds any water.
Terrible.
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/
when i lived in a block of flats in stockholm, the advice was to get hell out, dont take anything, walk dont run, dont use lifts.
Same as when i go to any office block in the UK, its "your sponsor will collect you, you ll be escorted to the outside fire point etc" no one has ever said stay put until the fire service arrive, these could be offices with a 1000 or so people in them.
500 people lived over 24 floors, surely the stair well could take that number? got to better than taking your chances in a smoked filled room or chucking your kids out the window in the vain hope they ll survive?
If it werent such a horrific incident, i d bet on that no one goes to jail over this, let alone the politicians who have presided over cuts to fire service and out sourcing of council housing services to a private management company.
yet again some d1ck is saying we ve the best fire service in the world.... dont they ever fcuking learn?
yeah take the p1ss out of so many people who have died wont you.
Or even an actual helicopter, which could carry more than one person? FFS, get a grip.
from memory (9/11) they can not use helicopters because of the up-draft from the fire.
The fire service arrived 6 minutes after the first call was made.
Forty fire engines, and around 200 firefighters were takling the blaze.
I suspect you would not be happy until there is a team of firefighters based 24x7 in every highrise building!
There are going to be people to blame for this but the coverage the fire service provides is not one of them.
Corporate manslaughter would require someone with culpability surely. If there isn't evidence of a senior manager's hand on the tiller you can't convict for this.
Unfortunately it is very easy to moan about there not being justice but unfortunately this is justice. Just not natural justice as often wanted straight after some terrible disaster or crime. Justice is blind they say. Image of a woman blindfolded holding the scales of justice and sword representing punishment. Do you really want her to lift up the metaphorical blindfold for headline cases?
Yup - I know very little about helicopters but talked a lot to my brother who got his licence a couple of years about. You'd need to be flying in the uprush of very hot air in order to save people - it's just not possible is my understanding.
The normal protection is to have a very secure means of escape and excellent protection of the structure of the building. At least the one seems to have stayed up. But one has to question the flammability of the building materials. 911 was a load of aircraft fuel and materials smashed into the middle of a building. There shouldn't be enough flammable materials in your average flat to burn the building down.
It appears that there is no local specialist equipment, as it didnt arrive until 3am, even now, they dont seem to have any means to get water above the 12th floor.
Are you saying that cuts to council services have not contributed to this fire.and on what basis?
Getting 200 fire fighters there without the equipment needed is not a sufficient response, however nobody at the moment, inc you or mamb0 know the real reasons or what could have been done differently, what is clear is that the residents complained over many years and got no-where.
Would this have been the response had the building housed white middle class residents?
Trying to find a silver lining, at least we are not talking terrorists or politics. Oh...
I am not sure. You have no chance.
The building's own water supply is supposed to accommodate this, but apparently it didn't. Fighting hi-rise fires still remains inherently difficult, but a lack of functioning hydrants within the upper floors will not help.
The fire service commander on the ground sounds mightily angry in interviews, and probably rightly so..
Meanwhile, politically, while it's too early to comment on outcomes, May will be feeling a little anxious re-employing Barwell given these events.
https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
Facebook? No. Just say no.