tuesday is unavoidably delayed

pinno

Stevo 666 wrote:

Veronese68 wrote:

Stevo 666 wrote:

Veronese68 wrote:

I don't wear glasses....yet.
That may change in a couple of hours.

Please let them be bi-focals

No, just for distance.

I'm the other way round - I'm speccy tw@t in the office but outside/driving/cycling etc I have no need. Just as well really, don't fancy doing DH wearing specs.

You need specs in the office. Just so you can peer over the top of them at the minions with a scowly face.

Stevo_666

Pinno wrote:

Stevo 666 wrote:

Veronese68 wrote:

Stevo 666 wrote:

Veronese68 wrote:

I don't wear glasses....yet.
That may change in a couple of hours.

Please let them be bi-focals

No, just for distance.

I'm the other way round - I'm speccy tw@t in the office but outside/driving/cycling etc I have no need. Just as well really, don't fancy doing DH wearing specs.

You need specs in the office. Just so you can peer over the top of them at the minions with a scowly face.

Uncanny, Mr. Stalker

ballysmate

Never mind, Mr Stalker, we have Stevo as Mr Grainger

ballysmate

I too am a speccy tw@t :oops:

Eyesight deteriorated much more rapidly once I started wearing specs for reading.
Anyone else notice that everyone working in an opticians wears specs? Convinced they are just plain glass.

ballysmate

I suppose the word 'speccy' was superfluous in my above post.

pinno

Ballysmate wrote:

I suppose the word 'speccy' was superfluous in my above post.

'Speccy' and 'tw@t' are mutually inclusive, so it is non-discriminatory.

Stevo_666

Ballysmate wrote:

Never mind, Mr Stalker, we have Stevo as Mr Grainger

Is it a coincidence that I can't see that image?