Obligatory sandbox for people who can't use an apostrophe?
neeb
Posts: 4,473
Here's an idea - every time someone starts a thread with a title including incorrect use of the apostrophe (especially using it for pluralisation), the mods move that thread to a special sandbox subforum, in which volunteers (kindly, patiently and without chastisement or ridicule) teach the OP the very simple rules of apostrophe use. Once the OP has demonstrated full understanding, the thread (with corrected title) is moved back into the main forum.
It's a win-win situation - we don't need to look at those fingers-on-blackboard-screeching abominations of punctuation abuse, and the OPs are forced to invest the five minutes required to learn something that will massively benefit them for the rest of their lives.
It's a win-win situation - we don't need to look at those fingers-on-blackboard-screeching abominations of punctuation abuse, and the OPs are forced to invest the five minutes required to learn something that will massively benefit them for the rest of their lives.
0
Comments
-
Says the bloke with 16000, almost all completely pointless, one-liner posts...0
-
Well that was a quick bite.0
-
neeb wrote:Says the bloke with 16000, almost all completely pointless, one-liner post's...The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
0
-
neeb wrote:Here's an idea - every time someone starts a thread with a title including incorrect use of the apostrophe (especially using it for pluralisation), the mods move that thread to a special sandbox subforum, in which volunteers (kindly, patiently and without chastisement or ridicule) teach the OP the very simple rules of apostrophe use. Once the OP has demonstrated full understanding, the thread (with corrected title) is moved back into the main forum.
It's a win-win situation - we don't need to look at those fingers-on-blackboard-screeching abominations of punctuation abuse, and the OPs are forced to invest the five minutes required to learn something that will massively benefit them for the rest of their lives.
Not sure about the 'without chastisement or ridicule' though. :twisted:
How about this as a candidate for the worst ever?
Is the gorilla tired yet?0 -
neeb wrote:Here's an idea - every time someone starts a thread with a title including incorrect use of the apostrophe (especially using it for pluralisation), the mods move that thread to a special sandbox subforum
Mods...short for moderators, so shouldn't that mean that it should be mod's?0 -
97th choice wrote:0
-
Fingerbobs wrote:
Mods...short for moderators, so shouldn't that mean that it should be mod's?0 -
-
ChrisAOnABike wrote:
How about this as a candidate for the worst ever?0 -
Ballysmate wrote:Well that was a quick bite.
Meh, it was 2 am and I was a little over full of Dutch Lager...We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
-
ddraver wrote:Ballysmate wrote:Well that was a quick bite.
Meh, it was 2 am and I was a little over full of Dutch Lager...0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:
Nothing wrong with that.0 -
neeb wrote:97th choice wrote:
I'm not into padding my post count unnecessarily.0 -
finchy wrote:Rick Chasey wrote:
Nothing wrong with that.
The possessive apostrophe is often dropped in place names (e.g. "Kings Road" is often used instead of "King's Road"). Kudos to TfL for not doing that.
But "Princes Street" in Edinburgh (sic) should be "Princes' Street" (not "Prince's Street), as it was named after two princes (George III's two eldest sons).0