Black or Gumwall on my deep sections
matt-h
Posts: 847
Hi,
I have a Scott Foil with 46mm Carbon Clinchers.
I cant decide on whether to put Gumwalls on or solid black.
Thoughts?
(yes, i know steerer needs sorting)
Matt
I have a Scott Foil with 46mm Carbon Clinchers.
I cant decide on whether to put Gumwalls on or solid black.
Thoughts?
(yes, i know steerer needs sorting)
Matt
Scott Foil Di2 viewtopic.php?f=40044&t=13020685&p=19496365#p19496365
Genesis Volare 853 viewtopic.php?f=40044&t=13020702&p=19589281#p19589281
Genesis Volare 853 viewtopic.php?f=40044&t=13020702&p=19589281#p19589281
0
Comments
-
What do you prefer? What's the better tyre for what you do? What's first - form or function?Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Whichever you like best- other people's opinions both:
A- Will make no difference to their performance.
B- Will vary between said people.0 -
One of each - like in the pic. When you get bored again, swap them round and post another thread.0
-
If gum walk makes you ride faster then go with that....
does it really matter what it looks like?
The bike can be the best looking one in the world but if you can't ride it and enjoy it what's the point !When i die I just hope the wife doesn't sell my stuff for what I told her I paid for it other wise someone will be getting a mega deal!!!
De rosa superking 888 di20 -
Gumwall, looks more pro.
(also the frame looks too small... Saddle is miles back and lots of spacers on the steerer.)0 -
-
ALIHISGREAT wrote:Gumwall, looks more pro.
(also the frame looks too small... Saddle is miles back and lots of spacers on the steerer.)
Seat/seat post look fine - agree re spacers though. Also agree re gum wall.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
A tv with a smaller bezel would be a start if you're obsessed with how things lookI'm sorry you don't believe in miracles0
-
Saddle looks fine. Looks clamped in the middle with very little offset.
Agree with spacers but comfy is comfy (tho do wonder why an aero frame when you sit upright).
On this bike I prefer the look of the black walls. Gumwall is too noisy with all the stuff going on with the frame too.0 -
-
I do love these very talented armchair bike fitters who can tell a bike is the wrong size just by looking at one.
I prefer the black. Goes better with the frame in my view.0 -
I twice bought tan walled tyres,
1) Corsa SC or something... first section of cobbles, nothing special really, 20 metres long and I almost removed the sidewall... tyre pretty much good for the bin...
2) I then bought some Challenge strada, sold them a few miles later to a fellow rider on here, who also managed to rip the sidewall off... never againleft the forum March 20230 -
I've had no orobs with my Veloflex masters
*kiss of death*Insta: ATEnduranceCoaching
ABCC Cycling Coach0 -
Is it just me or is this thread more of a "look at what I have" vibe? :PAnd the people bowed and prayed, to the neon god they made.0
-
cswitch wrote:I do love these very talented armchair bike fitters who can tell a bike is the wrong size just by looking at one.
I prefer the black. Goes better with the frame in my view.
Indeed. Besides, saddle set back will be the same (if it's correct) no matter what the frame size, it'll just have less post showing if a bigger frame...
I prefer the black too even though on my bike I prefer natural.Insta: ATEnduranceCoaching
ABCC Cycling Coach0 -
Gumwalls!
Though remember never to ride in the wet and expect them to look the same again. My Masters are now more of a greywall tyre.0 -
black, no question. Gumwalls only belong on retro bikes or specialist Paris Roubaix tubs.Pegoretti
Colnago
Cervelo
Campagnolo0 -
Should have gone for tubular rims if those are cheap end Chinese 'carbon' clincher rims...
Your flexibility on a road bike with racing geometry needs a New Years resolution to sort out...
mismatched bottle cages...
this is a cruel place sometimes0 -
NeXXus wrote:Is it just me or is this thread more of a "look at what I have" vibe? :P
It's just you.
With regards to the comments on the saddle fore/aft position; Scott Foils from size 52 downwards are supplied with an inline seatpost, with no layback. This means that the saddle position tends to look more rearward than normal. The saddle postion on my 49cm Foil looks pretty much the same and it fits me just fine.0 -
-
First world problems... :roll:seanoconn - gruagach craic!0
-
DKay wrote:NeXXus wrote:Is it just me or is this thread more of a "look at what I have" vibe? :P
It's just you.
With regards to the comments on the saddle fore/aft position; Scott Foils from size 52 downwards are supplied with an inline seatpost, with no layback. This means that the saddle position tends to look more rearward than normal. The saddle postion on my 49cm Foil looks pretty much the same and it fits me just fine.And the people bowed and prayed, to the neon god they made.0 -
matt-h wrote:
The gumwalls go better with your flooring and furnitureSelling my Legend frame
http://owningalegend.wordpress.com/2014 ... ced-price/0 -
0